Papers

Influence of method of reporting study results on decision of physicians to prescribe drugs to lower cholesterol concentration

Medizinische Universitats-Poliklinik, Kantonsspital Basel, CH-4031 Basle, Switzerland Correspondence to: Dr H C Bucher, McMaster University, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5.

Abstract

Objective : To determine whether the reporting of study results by using reductions in relative or absolute risk and the number needed to treat affects the views of physicians about the effectiveness of drugs to lower lipid concentrations and decisions about treatment.
Design : Random allocation of two questionnaires presenting the results of three end points of the Helsinki heart study as results from separate trials by using reduction in either relative or absolute20risk. In both questionnaires one end point was also presented by showing person years of treatment20needed to prevent one myocardial infarction. The effectiveness of lipid lowering drugs was assessed for all end points on an 11 point scale. For each study result the likelihood to treat hypercholesterolaemia of 7.5 mmol/l in a healthy man had to be indicated on a seven point scale.
Subjects : Random sample of 802 internists and general practioners representative of providers of primary care in Switzerland. Results - The response rate was 69.6% (558). For the prevention of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction the mean ratings of effectiveness of lipid lowering drugs were 0.45 (95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.69) and 1.39 (1.09 to 1.68) scale points lower when the reduction of absolute risk or number needed to treat were reported instead of the relative risk reduction (both P<0.001). Physicians receiving trial results for identical end points in form of absolute reduction of risk or number needed to treat were less inclined to treat hypercholesterolaemia (both P<0.001).
Conclusions : Physicians' views of the effectiveness of lipid lowering drugs and the decision to prescribe such drugs is affected by the predominant use of reduction of relative risk in trial reports and advertisements.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Preventing stroke with ramipril

P Badrinath, Andrew P Wakeman, Jacqueline G Wakeman, John S Yudkin, Malvinder S Parmar, and Birte Twisselmann
BMJ 2002 325: 439. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Aberegg, S. K., O'Brien, J. M. Jr, Khoury, P., Patel, R., Arkes, H. R. (2009). The Influence of Treatment Effect Size on Willingness to Adopt a Therapy. Med Decis Making 29: 599-605 [Abstract]  
• Visvanathan, K., Chlebowski, R. T., Hurley, P., Col, N. F., Ropka, M., Collyar, D., Morrow, M., Runowicz, C., Pritchard, K. I., Hagerty, K., Arun, B., Garber, J., Vogel, V. G., Wade, J. L., Brown, P., Cuzick, J., Kramer, B. S., Lippman, S. M. (2009). American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on the Use of Pharmacologic Interventions Including Tamoxifen, Raloxifene, and Aromatase Inhibition for Breast Cancer Risk Reduction. JCO 27: 3235-3258 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Kurth, T., Tzourio, C. (2009). Treating Patients With Ischemic Stroke With Tissue Plasminogen Activator in the 3.5- to 4-Hour Window: Numbers Support Benefit but the Message Is to Still Go Fast. Stroke 40: 2295-2296 [Full text]  
• McAllister, D, Wild, S (2009). Why should clinicians understand epidemiology?. Postgrad. Med. J. 85: 313-315 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Griffith, J. M., Lewis, C. L., Hawley, S., Sheridan, S. L., Pignone, M. P. (2009). Randomized Trial of Presenting Absolute v. Relative Risk Reduction in the Elicitation of Patient Values for Heart Disease Prevention With Conjoint Analysis. Med Decis Making 29: 167-174 [Abstract]  
• McAlister, F. A. MD MSc (2008). The "number needed to treat" turns 20 -- and continues to be used and misused. CMAJ 179: 549-553 [Full text]  
• Politi, M. C., Han, P. K. J., Col, N. F. (2007). Communicating the Uncertainty of Harms and Benefits of Medical Interventions. Med Decis Making 27: 681-695 [Abstract]  
• Halvorsen, P. A., Selmer, R., Kristiansen, I. S. (2007). Different Ways to Describe the Benefits of Risk-Reducing Treatments: A Randomized Trial. ANN INTERN MED 146: 848-856 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Wen, L., Badgett, R., Cornell, J. (2005). Number needed to treat: A descriptor for weighing therapeutic options. Am J Health Syst Pharm 62: 2031-2036 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Bjornson, D. C (2004). Interpretation of Drug Risk and Benefit: Individual and Population Perspectives. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 38: 694-699 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Pitches, D., Burls, A., Fry-Smith, A. (2003). How to make a silk purse from a sow's ear--a comprehensive review of strategies to optimise data for corrupt managers and incompetent clinicians. BMJ 327: 1436-1439 [Full text]  
• Domenighetti, G., D'Avanzo, B., Egger, M., Berrino, F., Perneger, T., Mosconi, P., Zwahlen, M. (2003). Women's perception of the benefits of mammography screening: population-based survey in four countries. Int J Epidemiol 32: 816-821 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Cassels, A., Hughes, M. A., Cole, C., Mintzes, B., Lexchin, J., McCormack, J. P. (2003). Drugs in the news: an analysis of Canadian newspaper coverage of new prescription drugs. CMAJ 168: 1133-1137 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• van Walraven, C., Hart, R. G., Wells, G. A., Petersen, P., Koudstaal, P. J., Gullov, A. L., Hellemons, B. S. P., Koefed, B. G., Laupacis, A. (2003). A Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and a Low Risk for Stroke While Taking Aspirin. Arch Intern Med 163: 936-943 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• (2003). Cluster-randomized, controlled trial of computer-based decision support for selecting long-term anti-thrombotic therapy after acute ischaemic stroke. QJM 96: 143-153 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Badrinath, P, Wakeman, A. P, Wakeman, J. G, Yudkin, J. S, Parmar, M. S, Twisselmann, B. (2002). Preventing stroke with ramipril. BMJ 325: 439-439 [Full text]  
• Chlebowski, R. T., Col, N., Winer, E. P., Collyar, D. E., Cummings, S. R., Vogel, V. G. III, Burstein, H. J., Eisen, A., Lipkus, I., Pfister, D. G. (2002). American Society of Clinical Oncology Technology Assessment of Pharmacologic Interventions for Breast Cancer Risk Reduction Including Tamoxifen, Raloxifene, and Aromatase Inhibition. JCO 20: 3328-3343 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Murphy, D. J., Gahm, G. J., Santilli, S., North, P., Oliver, S. C.N., Shapiro, H. (2002). Seniors' Preferences for Cancer Screening and Medication Use Based on Absolute Risk Reduction. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 57: M100-105 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Wells, J., Marshall, P., Crawley, B., Dickersin, K. (2001). Newspaper Reporting of Screening Mammography. ANN INTERN MED 135: 1029-1037 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Antman, E. M. (2001). Clinical Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine. Circulation 103 : e101-e104 [Full text]  
• Moynihan, R., Bero, L., Ross-Degnan, D., Henry, D., Lee, K., Watkins, J., Mah, C., Soumerai, S. B. (2000). Coverage by the News Media of the Benefits and Risks of Medications. NEJM 342: 1645-1650 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Edwards, A., Elwyn, G., Gwyn, R. (1999). General practice registrar responses to the use of different risk communication tools in simulated consultations: a focus group study. BMJ 319: 749-752 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Hamm, R. M., Lawler, F., Scheid, D., Ernster, V. L., Kuerer, H. M., Hwang, E. S., Esserman, L. J., Boice, J. D., Olsen, J. H., Hartmann, L. C., Schaid, D. J., Sellers, T. A. (1999). Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women with a High Risk of Breast Cancer. NEJM 340: 1837-1839 [Full text]  
• Steiner, J. F. (1999). Talking about Treatment: The Language of Populations and the Language of Individuals. ANN INTERN MED 130: 618-622 [Full text]  
• Skolbekken, J. A. (1998). Communicating the risk reduction achieved by cholesterol reducing drugs. BMJ 316: 1956-1958 [Full text]  
• Marteau, T. M, Croyle, R. T (1998). The new genetics: Psychological responses to genetic testing. BMJ 316: 693-696 [Full text]  
• Khan, M., Mukkamala, A., Taylor, D. K., Espinosa, A., Duff, J. (1998). Use of Lipid-Lowering Drugs With Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients: An Examination of Physician Prescribing Behaviors. J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THER 3: 217-221 [Abstract]  
• Simon, A., Megnien, J. L., Levenson, J. (1997). Coronary Risk Estimation and Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia. Circulation 96: 2449-2452 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Poole-Wilson, P. A., Bobbio, M., Allan, J. J., Packer, M., O'Connor, C. M., DeMets, D. L. (1997). Amlodipine in Chronic Heart Failure. NEJM 336: 1023-1024 [Full text]  
• Lawrence, M., Williams, T. (1996). Managed care and disease management in the NHS. BMJ 313: 125-126 [Full text]  
• Chatellier, G., Zapletal, E., Lemaitre, D., Menard, J., Degoulet, P. (1996). The number needed to treat: a clinically useful nomogram in its proper context. BMJ 312: 426-429 [Full text]  
• Hux, J. E., Naylor, C. D. (1995). In the Eye of the Beholder. Arch Intern Med 155: 2277-2280 [Abstract]  
• Fahey, T, Griffiths, S, Peters, T J (1995). Evidence based purchasing: understanding results of clinical trials and systematic reviews. BMJ 311: 1056-1059 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Wieland, D., Stuck, A. E., Siu, A. L., adams, J., Rubenstein, L. Z. (1995). Meta-Analytic Methods for Health Services Research: An Example from Geriatrics. Eval Health Prof 18: 252-282 [Abstract]  
• (1994). DATA PRESENTATION STYLE MAY BIAS DOCTORS' DECISIONS. JWatch General 1994: 8-8 [Full text]  
• Sackett, D L, Cook, R J (1994). Understanding clinical trials. BMJ 309: 755-756 [Full text]