Papers

Multicentre criterion based audit of the management of induced abortion in Scotland

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aberdeen Maternity20Hospital, Aberdeen AB9 2ZD Lothian Health Board, Family Planning and Well Woman Services, Edinburgh EH4 1NL Correspondence to: Dr Penney.

Abstract

Objectives : To assess and improve the quality of care provided to women undergoing induced abortion. Design - Two rounds of prospective, criterion based case note review audit.
Setting : Ten NHS gynaecology units throughout Scotland.
Subjects : 2004 patient episodes of abortion care identified consecutively during two rounds of audit. The first round comprised 967 cases and the second round 1037.
Interventions : Dissemination of results from the first round of audit and recommendations for change20in the form of a written report and at postgraduate meetings in participating hospitals.
Main outcome measures : Improvements in quality of care as assessed against 16 previously agreed criteria, both overall across the 10 study hospitals and within individual hospitals.
Results : Overall, four significant improvements occurred: increased availability of early medical abortion, decreased utilisation of surgical abortion at very early gestation, increased use of mifepristone priming before second trimester medical abortion, and increased provision of follow up. At the individual hospital level 42 of 150 elements of care studied20were "close to optimal" at the time of the first round of audit, rising to 54 at the second round (NS). A total of 31 significant improvements in individual elements of care occurred, but 11 significant deteriorations also occurred (at the P<0.05 level).
Conclusions : The prospective multicentre audit proved feasible aqnd achieved the aims of any form of audit in terms of identifying deficiencies and variations in care. The audit results promoted objective review of local abortion services in participating hospitals. At least for some elements of care in some hospitals significant improvements were detectable.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Audit of management of induced abortion Primary care component is ignored

K Stein, A Mortimore, I W Smith, M Ogilvie, J A G Paterson, and G R Scott
BMJ 1994 309: 609. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Cameron, M., Penney, G., MacLennan, G., McLeer, S., Walker, A. (2007). Impact on Maternity Professionals of Novel Approaches to Clinical Audit Feedback. Eval Health Prof 30: 75-95 [Abstract]  
• Foy, R., Walker, A., Ramsay, C., Penney, G., Grimshaw, J., Francis, J. (2005). Theory-based identification of barriers to quality improvement: induced abortion care. Int J Qual Health Care 17: 147-155 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Margison, F (1994). Assessing change through audit. BMJ 309: 671b-671 [Full text]  
• Stein, K, Mortimore, A, Smith, I W, Ogilvie, M, Paterson, J A G, Scott, G R (1994). Audit of management of induced abortion Primary care component is ignored. BMJ 309: 609-609 [Full text]  
• MacRae, K. (1994). Commentary: Validity of assessing change through audit. BMJ 309: 18-19 [Full text]