BMJ 1994;308:1399-1403 (28 May)
Papers
Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis
G Flannelly,
D Anderson,
H C Kitchener,
,a
E M F Mann,
M Campbell,
P Fisher,
F Walker,
A A Templeton a Harris Birthright Research Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Pathology, Aberdeen AB9 2ZB Information Services Team, Grampian Health Board, Aberdeen AB9 1RE Correspondence to Dr
Abstract
Objective : To compare the outcomes in women with mild and moderate dyskaryosis after increasing periods of surveillance and thereby to define a rational protocol for managing such women. Design - Prospective study with randomisation of women to one of four treatment groups, each with a different period of surveillance; one group in which the women were given immediate treatment and three other groups in which the women were under surveillance for six, 12, and 24 months.
Setting : A dedicated colposcopy clinic in Aberdeen, Scotland.
Subjects : 902 women who presented with a mildly or moderately dyskaryotic smear for the first time.
Interventions : Cytological and colposcopic examinations at intervals of six months until the allocated period of surveillance was completed, at which time biopsy was performed. Women with severe dyskaryosis were withdrawn from surveillance and a biopsy was performed. Main outcome measures - The histological findings after punch biopsy or large loop excision of the transformation zone, and the trends in cytological appearances of serial cervical smears. Results - 793 women completed the study. In all, 769 women had an adequate final smear, of which 197 were normal cytologically, 328 were still mildly or moderately dyskaryotic, and 244 were severely dyskaryotic. Seventeen of the 67 (25%) women with one repeat smear showing non-dyskaryosis had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III compared with only one of the 31 (3%) women with no dyskaryosis in four repeat cervical smears (P <0.0001). None of the women had invasive cancer. Of 158 women whose index smear showed mild dyskaryosis and who were allocated to the group under surveillance for two years, only 40 had not defaulted or still had dyskaryotic smears by the end of the two years.
Conclusion : Cytological surveillance, although safe, is not an efficient strategy for managing women with mildly abnormal smears. Women with any degree of dyskaryosis in a smear should be referred for colpscopy.
|
Clinical implications
- Clinical implications
- Mild and moderate dyskaryosis is evident in at least 3% of all cervical smears
- Debate continues as to whether cytological surveillance or referral for colposcopy is most appropriate for the management of women with mild or moderate dyskaryosis
- This study shows a high rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III, a relatively high rate of default among women allocated to surveillance, and low rates of smears that become normal cytologically
- These findings indicate that referral for colposcopy is a more efficient strategy for managing women with mildly dyskaryotic smears than cytological surveillance
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Articles
-
Cytological surveillance compared with immediate referral for colposcopy in management of women with low grade cervical abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial
- TOMBOLA Group
BMJ 2009 339: b2546.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Biopsy and selective recall compared with immediate large loop excision in management of women with low grade abnormal cervical cytology referred for colposcopy: multicentre randomised controlled trial
- TOMBOLA Group
BMJ 2009 339: b2548.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Management of mild dyskaryosis
- H Merriman, M Charnock, W Gray, and N Hallam
BMJ 1994 309: 412-3.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Management of cervical dyskaryosis National guidelines are not followed
- A Saha, M Maresh, M A Thomas, L M Reay, M H Jones, J J Jones J H Robertson, B Woodend, A Herbert, D Jenkins, S Gallivan, C S Johnson, C Wilkinson, T Peters, A E Raffle, E F D MacKenzie, and E F D MacKenzie
BMJ 1994 309: 268-270.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
TOMBOLA Group,
(2009). Cytological surveillance compared with immediate referral for colposcopy in management of women with low grade cervical abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ
339: b2546-b2546
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
TOMBOLA Group,
(2009). Biopsy and selective recall compared with immediate large loop excision in management of women with low grade abnormal cervical cytology referred for colposcopy: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ
339: b2548-b2548
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Crowther, S, Turner, L, Magee, D, Gibbons, D
(2008). Role of age stratification for colposcopy referral following initial diagnosis of mild dyskaryosis. J. Clin. Pathol.
61: 665-668
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Sawaya, G. F.
(2005). A 21-Year-Old Woman With Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance. JAMA
294: 2210-2218
[Full text]
-
Arbyn, M., Buntinx, F., Ranst, M. V., Paraskevaidis, E., Martin-Hirsch, P., Dillner, J.
(2004). Virologic Versus Cytologic Triage of Women With Equivocal Pap Smears: A Meta-analysis of the Accuracy To Detect High-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst
96: 280-293
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Lytwyn, A., Sellors, J. W., Mahony, J. B., Daya, D., Chapman, W., Ellis, N., Roth, P., Lorincz, A. T., Gafni, A., The HPV Effectiveness in Lowgrade Paps Study No.,
(2000). Comparison of human papillomavirus DNA testing and repeat Papanicolaou test in women with low-grade cervical cytologic abnormalities: a randomized trial. CMAJ
163: 701-707
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Savard, J., Miller, S. M., Mills, M., O'Leary, A., Harding, H., Douglas, S. D., Mangan, C. E., Belch, R., Winokur, A.
(1999). Association Between Subjective Sleep Quality and Depression on Immunocompetence in Low-Income Women at Risk for Cervical Cancer. Psychosom. Med.
61: 496-507
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Mount, S. L., Papillo, J. L.
(1999). A Study of 10 296 Pediatric and Adolescent Papanicolaou Smear Diagnoses in Northern New England. Pediatrics
103: 539-545
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Holowaty, P., Miller, A. B., Rohan, T., To, T.
(1999). Natural History of Dysplasia of the Uterine Cervix. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst
91: 252-258
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Shafi, M I
(1994). Controversies in Management: Management of women with mild dyskaryosis Cytological surveillance avoids overtreatment. BMJ
309: 590-592
[Full text]
-
Soutter, W P
(1994). Controversies in Management: Immediate referral to colposcopy is safer. BMJ
309: 591-592
[Full text]
-
Merriman, H, Charnock, M, Gray, W, Hallam, N
(1994). Management of mild dyskaryosis. BMJ
309: 412c-3
[Full text]
-
Saha, A, Maresh, M, Thomas, M A, Reay, L M, Jones, M H, Robertson, J J J. J H, Woodend, B, Herbert, A, Jenkins, D, Gallivan, S, Johnson, C S, Wilkinson, C, Peters, T, Raffle, A E, MacKenzie, E F D
(1994). Management of cervical dyskaryosis National guidelines are not followed. BMJ
309: 268-270
[Full text]
-
(1994). MANAGEMENT OF MILD AND MODERATE CERVICAL DYSKARYOSIS. JWatch General
1994: 5-5
[Full text]
-
Hammond, R
(1994). Management of women with smears showing mild dyskaryosis. BMJ
308: 1383-84
[Full text]