BMJ 1994;308:1208-1212 (7 May)
General practice
Integrated care for diabetes: clinical, psychosocial, and economic evaluation
, for the Diabetes Integrated Care Evaluation Team
Correspondence to: Mr Simon Naji, Health services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB9 2ZD.
Abstract
Objectives : To evaluate integrated care for diabetes in clinical, psychosocial, and economic terms.
Design : Pragmatic randomised trial.
Setting : Hospital diabetic clinic and three general practice groups in Grampian.
Patients : 274 adult diabetic patients attending a hospital clinic and registered with one of three general practices. Intervention - Random allocation to conventional hospital clinic care or integrated care. Integrated care patients seen in general practice every three or four months and in the hospital clinic annually. General practitioners were given written guidelines for integrated care.
Main outcome measures : Metabolic control, psychosocial status, knowledge of diabetes, beliefs about control of diabetes, satisfaction with treatment, disruption of normal activities, numbers of consultations and admissions, frequency of metabolic monitoring, costs to patients and NHS. Results - A higher proportion of patients defaulted from conventional care (14 (10%)) than from integrated care (4 (3%), 95% confidence interval of difference 2% to 13%). After two years no significant differences were found between the groups in metabolic control, psychosocial status, knowledge, beliefs about control, satisfaction with treatment, unscheduled admissions, or disruption of normal activities. Integrated care was as effective for insulin dependent as non-insulin dependent patients. Patients in integrated care had more visits and higher frequencies of examination. Costs to patients were lower in integrated care (mean pounds sterling 1.70) than in conventional care (pounds sterling 8). 88% of patients who experienced integrated care wished to continue with it.
Conclusions : This model of integrated care for diabetes was at least as effective as conventional hospital clinic care.
|
Practice implications
- Practice implications
- Diabetes mellitus affects 1-2% of the population in Britain
- Life long surveillance is necessary to prevent and detect the long term complications
- In this study integrated care coordinated by a computer system was as effective at maintaining metabolic control as hospital clinics
- The complication screening programme was delivered more effectively in integrated care
- Integrated care may help improve management of diabetes since it was popular with patients and had a lower default rate than hospital based care
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Article
-
Integrated care for diabetes
- P Chedin and J Cahen-Varsaux
BMJ 1994 309: 275.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Crowe, S., Tully, M. P, Cantrill, J. A
(2009). The prescribing of specialist medicines: what factors influence GPs' decision making?. Fam Pract
0: cmp030v1-cmp030
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Murchie, P., Hannaford, P. C, Wyke, S., Nicolson, M. C, Campbell, N. C
(2007). Designing an integrated follow-up programme for people treated for cutaneous malignant melanoma: a practical application of the MRC framework for the design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Fam Pract
24: 283-292
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Smetana, G. W., Landon, B. E., Bindman, A. B., Burstin, H., Davis, R. B., Tjia, J., Rich, E. C.
(2007). A Comparison of Outcomes Resulting From Generalist vs Specialist Care for a Single Discrete Medical Condition: A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique. Arch Intern Med
167: 10-20
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Krumholz, H. M., Currie, P. M., Riegel, B., Phillips, C. O., Peterson, E. D., Smith, R., Yancy, C. W., Faxon, D. P.
(2006). A Taxonomy for Disease Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Disease Management Taxonomy Writing Group. Circulation
114: 1432-1445
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Penn, D. L., Burns, J. R., Georgiou, A., Davies, P. G. P., Harris, M. F.
(2004). Evolution of a register recall system to enable the delivery of better quality of care in general practice. Health Informatics Journal
10: 165-176
[Abstract]
-
Venkat Narayan, K. M., Benjamin, E., Gregg, E. W., Norris, S. L., Engelgau, M. M.
(2004). Diabetes Translation Research: Where Are We and Where Do We Want To Be?. ANN INTERN MED
140: 958-963
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Ashton, C. M., Souchek, J., Petersen, N. J., Menke, T. J., Collins, T. C., Kizer, K. W., Wright, S. M., Wray, N. P.
(2003). Hospital Use and Survival among Veterans Affairs Beneficiaries. NEJM
349: 1637-1646
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Weingarten, S. R, Henning, J. M, Badamgarav, E., Knight, K., Hasselblad, V., Gano, A. Jr, Ofman, J. J
(2002). Interventions used in disease management programmes for patients with chronic illness---which ones work? Meta-analysis of published reports. BMJ
325: 925-925
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Mitchell, G. K
(2002). How well do general practitioners deliver palliative care? A systematic review. Palliat Med
16: 457-464
[Abstract]
-
Cheung, W., Dove, J, Lervy, B, Russell, I., Williams, J.
(2002). Shared care in gastroenterology: GPs' views of open access to out-patient follow-up for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Fam Pract
19: 53-56
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Renders, C. M., Valk, G. D., Griffin, S. J., Wagner, E. H., Eijk van, J. ThM., Assendelft, W. J.J.
(2001). Interventions to Improve the Management of Diabetes in Primary Care, Outpatient, and Community Settings: A systematic review. Diabetes Care
24: 1821-1833
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Williams, J G, Cheung, W Y, Russell, I T, Cohen, D R, Longo, M, Lervy, B
(2000). Open access follow up for inflammatory bowel disease: pragmatic randomised trial and cost effectiveness study. BMJ
320: 544-548
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Barlow, I., Beer, S., Summerton, N., Khunti, K., Griffin, S.
(1999). Meta-analysis of diabetes care in general practice. BMJ
318: 460-460
[Full text]
-
Griffin, S., Greenhalgh, T.
(1998). Diabetes care in general practice: meta-analysis of randomised control trials • Commentary: Meta-analysis is a blunt and potentially misleading instrument for analysing models of service delivery. BMJ
317: 390-396
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Pedersen, L. L., Leese, B.
(1997). What will a primary care led NHS mean for GP workload? the problem of the lack of an evidence base. BMJ
314: 1337-1337
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Smith, S., Robinson, J., Hollyer, J., Bhatt, R., Ash, S., Shaunak, S.
(1996). Combining specialist and primary health care teams for HIV positive patients: retrospective and prospective studies. BMJ
312: 416-420
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Coulter, A.
(1995). Shifting the balance from secondary to primary care. BMJ
311: 1447-1448
[Full text]
-
McGhee, S M, Hedley, A J
(1995). Shared care in diabetes. BMJ
310: 1199c-1200
[Full text]
-
Chedin, P, Cahen-Varsaux, J
(1994). Integrated care for diabetes. BMJ
309: 275-275
[Full text]