Papers

Effects of case management after severe head injury

Department of Neurological Sciences, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London EC1A 7BE Atkinson Morleys Hospital, Wolfson Rehabilitation Centre, and St George's Hospital Medical School, London SW20 0NR Wellcome Neuroscience Group, Glasgow G12 0AA Department of Biostatistics and Computing, Institute of Psychiatry, London SE5 8AF Correspondence to: Dr Greenwood.

Abstract

Objectives : To examine the effects of early case management for patients with severe head injury on outcome, family function, and provision of rehabilitation services.
Design : Prospective controlled unmatched non-randomised study for up to two years after injury.
Setting : Four district general hospitals and two university teaching hospitals, each with neurosurgical units, in east central, north, and north east London and its environs.
Subjects : 126 patients aged 16-60 recruited acutely and sequentially after severe head injury. All received standard rehabilitation services in each of20the six hospitals and districts: case management was also provided for the 56 patients admitted to three of the hospitals.
Main outcome measures : Standard measures of patients' physical and cognitive impairment; disability and handicap; and affective, behavioural, and social functioning and of relatives' affective and social functioning. Relatives' perception of burden; changes in patients' and relatives' housing, financial, vocational, recreational, and medical needs; and ongoing requirements for care and support; and the amount and type of paramedical input provided were assessed with structured questionnaires.
Results : For a given severity of injury, case management increased the chance and range of contact with impatient and outpatient rehabilitation services. However, duration of contact was not increased by case management, and there was no demonstrable improvement in outcome in the case managed group. Any trends were in favour of the control group and could be accounted for by group differences in initial severity of injury.
Conclusions : Widespread introduction of early case management of patients after severe head injury20is not supported, and early case management is not a substitute for improvement in provision of skilled and specialist rehabilitation for patients.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Case management after severe head injury

C F Murray-Leslie and C Kenny
BMJ 1994 309: 807. [Extract] [Full Text]

Rehabilitation needs after severe head injury

Brian Pentland
BMJ 1994 309: 129. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Wade, D T, King, N S, Wenden, F J, Crawford, S, Caldwell, F E (1998). Routine follow up after head injury: a second randomised controlled trial. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 65: 177-183 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Timpka, T., Leijon, M., Karlsson, G., Svensson, L., Bjurulf, P. (1997). Long-term economic effects of team-based clinical case management of patients with chronic minor disease and long-term absence from working life. Scand J Public Health 25: 229-237 [Abstract]  
• Murray-Leslie, C F, Kenny, C (1994). Case management after severe head injury. BMJ 309: 807b-807 [Full text]