BMJ 1994;308:313-320 (29 January)

General practice

Randomised controlled trial evaluating cardiovascular screening and intervention in general practice: principal results of British family heart study

D A Wood, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, National Heart and Lung Institute, London SW3 6LY.,a A L Kinmonth, G A Davies, J Yarwood, S G Thompson, S D M Pyke, Y Kok, R Cramb, C Le Guen, T M Marteau, P N Durrington,  for the Family Heart Study Group

a Preventive Cardiology, Medicine, University of Southampton and Clinical Epidemiology, National Heart and Lung Institute, University of London Primary Medical Care and Preventive Cardiology, Medicine, University of Southampton Medical Statistics Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Wolfson Research Laboratories, University of Birmingham Wellcome Psychology and Genetics Research Group, United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's Hospitals Department of Medicine, University of Manchester Correspondence to: Professor

Abstract

Objective : To measure the change in cardiovascular risk factors achievable in families over one year by a cardiovascular screening and lifestyle intervention in general practice.
Design : Randomised controlled trial in 26 general practices in 13 towns in Britain.
Subjects : 12472 men aged 40-59 and their partners (7460 men and 5012 women) identified by household.
Intervention : Nurse led programme using a family centred approach with follow up according to degree of risk.
Main outcome measures : After one year the pairs of practices were compared for differences in (a) total coronary (Dundee) risk score and (b) cigarette smoking, weight, blood pressure, and random blood cholesterol and glucose concentrations.
Results : In men the overall reduction in coronary risk score was 16% (95% confidence interval 11% to 21%) in the intervention practices at one year. This was partitioned between systolic pressure (7%), smoking (5%), and cholesterol concentration (4%). The reduction for women was similar. For both sexes reported cigarette smoking at one year was lower by about 4%, systolic pressure by 7 mm Hg, diastolic pressure by 3 mm Hg, weight by 1 kg, and cholesterol concentration by 0.1 mmol/l, but there was no shift in glucose concentration. Weight, blood pressure, and cholesterol concentration showed the greatest difference at the top of the distribution. If maintained long term the differences in risk factors achieved would mean only a 12% reduction in risk of coronary events.
Conclusions : As most general practices are not using such an intensive programme the changes in coronary risk factors achieved by the voluntary health promotion package for primary care are likely to be even smaller. The government's screening policy cannot be justified by these results.

Clinical implications

  • Clinical implications

  • A national general practice nurse led cardiovascular screening and lifestyle intervention programme reached 73% of eligible families and maintained contact with 88% of men and 85% of women over one year

  • After one year reported cigarette smoking was lower by about 4%, weight by 1 kg, systolic pressure by 7 mm Hg, diastolic pressure by 3 mm Hg, and cholesterol concentration by 0.1 mmol/l on average

  • Smoking prevalence, however, was twice as high in those who did not return at one year compared with those who did

  • This intensive family centred programme achieved at most an overall 12% reduction in coronary risk (Dundee risk score), similar in both men and women

  • The voluntary health promotion package in primary care cannot be justified, in its present form, by these results, and alternative preventive strategies need to be developed and evaluated


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Health promotion in general practice
J K Cruickshank
BMJ 1994 308: 852. [Extract] [Full Text]

Health promotion in general practice
Paul Pharoah and Simon Sanderson
BMJ 1994 308: 852-853. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lauritzen, T., Ager Jensen, M. S., Thomsen, J. L., Christensen, B., Engberg, M. (2008). Health tests and health consultations reduced cardiovascular risk without psychological strain, increased healthcare utilization or increased costs: An overview of the results from a 5-year randomized trial in primary care. The Ebeltoft Health Promotion Project (EHPP). Scand J Public Health 36: 650-661 [Abstract]  
  • von Huth Smith, L., Ladelund, S., Borch-Johnsen, K., Jorgensen, T. (2008). A randomized multifactorial intervention study for prevention of ischaemic heart disease (Inter99): The long-term effect on physical activity. Scand J Public Health 36: 380-388 [Abstract]  
  • Sayers, S. L, White, T., Zubritsky, C., Oslin, D. W (2006). Family involvement in the care of healthy medical outpatients. Fam Pract 23: 317-324 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Wilkes, S, Evans, A, Henderson, M, Gibson, J (2005). Pragmatic, observational study of bupropion treatment for smoking cessation in general practice. Postgrad. Med. J. 81: 719-722 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kerruish, N J, Robertson, S P (2005). Newborn screening: new developments, new dilemmas. J. Med. Ethics 31: 393-398 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Turner, R. M, Thompson, S. G, Spiegelhalter, D. J (2005). Prior distributions for the intracluster correlation coefficient, based on multiple previous estimates, and their application in cluster randomized trials. Clin Trials 2: 108-118 [Abstract]  
  • Davey Smith, G., Bracha, Y., Svendsen, K. H., Neaton, J. D., Haffner, S. M., Kuller, L. H., for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Re, (2005). Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes in the Randomized Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. ANN INTERN MED 142: 313-322 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Jacobsen, E. T., Rasmussen, S. R., Christensen, M., Engberg, M., Lauritzen, T. (2005). Perspectives on lifestyle intervention: The views of general practitioners who have taken part in a health promotion study. Scand J Public Health 33: 4-10 [Abstract]  
  • Laurant, M. G H, Hermens, R. P M G, Braspenning, J. C C, Sibbald, B., Grol, R. P T M (2004). Impact of nurse practitioners on workload of general practitioners: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 328: 927- [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Laopaiboon, M (2003). Meta-analyses involving cluster randomization trials: a review of published literature in health care. Stat Methods Med Res 12: 515-530 [Abstract]  
  • Oakeshott, P., Kerry, S., Austin, A., Cappuccio, F. (2003). Is there a role for nurse-led blood pressure management in primary care?. Fam Pract 20: 469-473 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • O'Malley, P. G., Feuerstein, I. M., Taylor, A. J. (2003). Impact of Electron Beam Tomography, With or Without Case Management, on Motivation, Behavioral Change, and Cardiovascular Risk Profile: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA 289: 2215-2223 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Walker, Z., Townsend, J., Oakley, L., Donovan, C., Smith, H., Hurst, Z., Bell, J., Marshall, S. (2002). Health promotion for adolescents in primary care: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 325: 524-524 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Ades, P. A., Kottke, T. E., Houston Miller, N., McGrath, J. C., Record, N. B., Record, S. S. (2002). Task Force #3--getting results: who, where, and how?. J Am Coll Cardiol 40: 615-630 [Full text]  
  • Eden, K. B., Orleans, C. T., Mulrow, C. D., Pender, N. J., Teutsch, S. M. (2002). Does Counseling by Clinicians Improve Physical Activity? A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. ANN INTERN MED 137: 208-215 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Day, L., Patch, C. (2002). The new genetics: A research agenda for nurses?. Journal of Research in Nursing 7: 161-163  
  • GILBODY, S., WHITTY, P. (2002). Improving the delivery and organisation of mental health services: beyond the conventional randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Psychiatry 180: 13-18 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Garcia-Pena, C., Thorogood, M., Armstrong, B., Reyes-Frausto, S., Munoz, O. (2001). Pragmatic randomized trial of home visits by a nurse to elderly people with hypertension in Mexico. Int J Epidemiol 30: 1485-1491 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Walter, F. M, Kinmonth, A. L., Hyland, F., Murrell, P., Marteau, T. M, Todd, C. (2001). Experiences and expectations of the new genetics in relation to familial risk of breast cancer: a comparison of the views of GPs and practice nurses. Fam Pract 18: 491-494 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Fowler, G. (2001). Commentary: GP check-ups' still of limited value. Int J Epidemiol 30: 942-943 [Full text]  
  • Toop, L., Richards, D. (2001). Preventing cardiovascular disease in primary care. BMJ 323: 246-247 [Full text]  
  • Little, P., Somerville, J., Williamson, I., Warner, G., Moore, M., Wiles, R., George, S., Smith, A., Peveler, R. (2001). Randomised controlled trial of self management leaflets and booklets for minor illness provided by post. BMJ 322: 1214-1214 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Lingfors, H, Lindstrom, K, Persson, L-G, Bengtsson, C, Lissner, L (2001). Evaluation of "Live for Life", a health promotion programme in the County of Skaraborg, Sweden. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 55: 277-282 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Ketola, E., Sipilä, R., Mäkelä, M., Klockars, M. (2000). Quality improvement programme for cardiovascular disease risk factor recording in primary care. Qual Saf Health Care 9: 175-180 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hobbs, F D R., Frost, G., Doré, C., Smith, G. D., Ebrahim, S., Bennett, R., Steptoe, A., Rink, E., Kerry, S., Kendrick, T., Hilton, S. (2000). Behavioural counselling in general practice about risk of CHD. BMJ 321: 49b-49 [Full text]  
  • Moore, H., Adamson, A. J, Gill, T., Waine, C. (2000). Nutrition and the health care agenda: a primary care perspective. Fam Pract 17: 197-202 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Wilkes, S., Evans, A. (1999). A cross-sectional study comparing the motivation for smoking cessation in apparently healthy patients who smoke to those who smoke and have ischaemic heart disease, hypertension or diabetes. Fam Pract 16: 608-610 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Steptoe, A., Doherty, S., Rink, E., Kerry, S., Kendrick, T., Hilton, S., Day, S. (1999). Behavioural counselling in general practice for the promotion of healthy behaviour among adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease: randomised trial • Commentary: Treatment allocation by the method of minimisation. BMJ 319: 943-948 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Naylor, P. J., Simmonds, G., Riddoch, C., Velleman, G., Turton, P. (1999). Comparison of stage-matched and unmatched interventions to promote exercise behaviour in the primary care setting. Health Educ Res 14: 653-666 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kelleher, C. C., Fallon, U. B., Mc Carthy, E., Dineen, B. D., O'Donnell, M., Killian, M., Hope, A., Bluett, D., Varley, O., McDonagh, G. (1999). Feasibility of a lifestyle cardiovascular health promotion programme for 8--15-year-olds in Irish general practice: results of the Galway Health Project. HEALTH PROMOT INT 14: 221-230 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bradley, F., Cupples, M. E (1999). Reducing the risk of recurrent coronary heart disease. BMJ 318: 1499-1500 [Full text]  
  • Flanagan, D.E.H., Cox, P., Paine, D., Davies, J., Armitage, M. (1999). Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care: a healthy heart initiative. QJM 92: 245-250 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Steptoe, A., Doherty, S., Kendrick, T., Rink, E., Hilton, S. (1999). Attitudes to cardiovascular health promotion among GPs and practice nurses. Fam Pract 16: 158-163 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bradley, F., Wiles, R., Kinmonth, A.-L., Mant, D., Gantley, M. (1999). Development and evaluation of complex interventions in health services research: case study of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP). BMJ 318: 711-715 [Full text]  
  • Hilton, S., Doherty, S., Kendrick, T., Kerry, S., Rink, E., Steptoe, A. (1999). Promotion of healthy behaviour among adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease in general practice: methodology and baseline data from the Change of Heart study. Health Education Journal 58: 3-16 [Abstract]  
  • Clark, J. M., Maben, J. (1999). Health promotion in primary health care nursing: the development of quality indicators. Health Education Journal 58: 99-119 [Abstract]  
  • Campbell, N C, Ritchie, L D, Thain, J, Deans, H G, Rawles, J M, Squair, J L (1998). Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease: a randomised trial of nurse led clinics in primary care. Heart 80: 447-452 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Campbell, N. C, Thain, J., Deans, H G., Ritchie, L. D, Rawles, J. M (1998). Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease: baseline survey of provision in general practice. BMJ 316: 1430-1434 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Garber, A. M., Browner, W. S. (1997). Cholesterol Screening Guidelines : Consensus, Evidence, and Common Sense. Circulation 95: 1642-1645 [Full text]  
  • Ashworth, P. (1997). Breakthrough or bandwagon? Are interventions tailored to Stage of Change more effective than non-staged interventions?. Health Education Journal 56: 166-174 [Abstract]  
  • Florin, D. (1996). Barriers to evidence based policy. BMJ 313: 894-895 [Full text]  
  • Langham, S., Thorogood, M., Normand, C., Muir, J., Jones, L., Fowler, G. (1996). Costs and cost effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: the Oxcheck study. BMJ 312: 1265-1268 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Wonderling, D., McDermott, C., Buxton, M., Kinmonth, A.-L., Pyke, S., Thompson, S., Wood, D. (1996). Costs and cost effectiveness of cardiovascular screening and intervention: the British family heart study. BMJ 312: 1269-1273 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Wonderling, D., Langham, S., Buxton, M., Normand, C., McDermott, C. (1996). What can be concluded from the Oxcheck and British family heart studies: commentary on cost effectiveness analyses. BMJ 312: 1274-1278 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Graham, J. (1996). Health checks and coronary risk. BMJ 312: 974a-974 [Full text]  
  • Hanlon, P, Mcewen, J, Gilmour, H, Carey, L, Tannahill, C, Tannahill, A, Kelly, M (1996). Authors' reply. BMJ 312: 974b-974 [Full text]  
  • Doyle, Y., Thomas, P. (1996). Promoting health through primary care: challenges in taking a strategic approach. Health Education Journal 55: 3-10 [Abstract]  
  • Clarke, A. (1995). Population screening for genetic susceptibility to disease. BMJ 311: 35-38 [Full text]  
  • (1995). Effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: final results of the OXCHECK study. BMJ 310: 1099-1104 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Lindholm, L H, Ekbom, T, Dash, C, Eriksson, M, Tibblin, G, Schersten, B (1995). The impact of health care advice given in primary care on cardiovascular risk. BMJ 310: 1105-1109 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Field, K, Thorogood, M, Silagy, C, Normand, C, O'Neill, C, Muir, J (1995). Strategies for reducing coronary risk factors in primary care: which is most cost effective?. BMJ 310: 1109-1112 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Neil, H A W, Roe, L, Godlee, R J P, Moore, J W, Clark, G M G, Brown, J, Thorogood, M, Stratton, I M, Lancaster, T, Mant, D, Fowler, G H (1995). Randomised trial of lipid lowering dietary advice in general practice: the effects on serum lipids, lipoproteins, and antioxidants. BMJ 310: 569-573 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hunt, P. (1995). Development and evaluation of the Changing what you eat resources for primary care. Health Education Journal 54: 405-414 [Abstract]  
  • Davies, G., Pyke, S., Kinmonth, A.-L. (1994). Effect of non-attenders on the potential of a primary care programme to reduce cardiovascular risk in the population. BMJ 309: 1553-1556 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Wilson, A., McDonald, P. (1994). Comparison of patient questionnaire, medical record, and audio tape in assessment of health promotion in general practice consultations. BMJ 309: 1483-1485 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Stott, N C H, Kinnersley, P, Rollnick, S (1994). The limits to health promotion. BMJ 309: 971-972 [Full text]  
  • Cupples, M E, McKnight, A (1994). Randomised controlled trial of health promotion in general practice for patients at high cardiovascular risk. BMJ 309: 993-996 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Silagy, C (1994). Recent Advances:General practice. BMJ 309: 943-945 [Full text]  
  • Charlton, B G, Calvert, N, White, M, Rye, G P, Conrad, W, van Zwanenberg, T (1994). Health promotion priorities for general practice: constructing and using "indicative prevalences". BMJ 308: 1019-1022 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bonneux, L, Barendregt, J J, Ravnskov, U, Ramsay, L E, Yeo, W W, Jackson, P R, Sheldon, T A, Song, F, Millo, J, Sudlow, C L M, Macleod, M R, Heady, J A, Morris, J N, Oliver, M F, Vine, D L, Hastings, G E, Durrington, P N, Dugdale, A, Law, M R, Wu, T, Wald, N J, Hackshaw, A, Bailey, A S G T. (1994). Ischaemic heart disease and cholesterol There's more to heart disease than cholesterol. BMJ 308: 1038-1041 [Full text]  
  • Stott, N (1994). Screening for cardiovascular risk in general practice. BMJ 308: 285-286 [Full text]  



Student BMJ

Asylum seekers' care

UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview