BMJ 1994;308:107-110 (8 January)
Papers
Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation
R Andersson,
A Hugander,
A Thulin,
P O Nystrom,
G Olaison
Department of Surgery, Ryhov Hospital, S-551 85 Jonkoping, Sweden Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Linkoping, Sweden Correspondence to : Dr. Andersson.
Abstract
Objective : To clarify poorly understood epidemiological features of appendicitis.
Design : Retrospective study of consecutive cases from a defined population and analysis of data from published studies.
Setting : County of Jonkoping, Sweden. 3029 patients who underwent operation in 1984-9 and 4717 patients from the county town who underwent operation in 1970-89, all for suspected appendicitis, plus 48 426 cases from six reported studies.
Main outcome measures : Incidences specific for age and sex and temporal trends of perforating and non-perforating appendicitis and removal of a normal appendix. Associations between diagnostic accuracy, rate of perforation, and incidences of removal of a normal appendix and of perforating and non-perforating appendicitis.
Results : The incidence of appendicitis was 116/100 000 inhabitants. Appendicitis was more common in male patients. The incidence of perforating appendicitis was independent of age, stable overtime, and uninfluenced by the rate of laparotomy, whereas the incidence of non-perforating appendicitis was age dependent, decreasing over time, and related to the diagnostic accuracy and rate of removal of a normal appendix.
Conclusions : Perforating and non-perforating appendicitis seem to be separate entities, and appendicitis that resolves spontaneously is common. This may have important implications for managing suspected appendicitis.
|
Clinical implications
- Clinical implications
- The incidence of appendicitis is declining and shows large geographical variations
- A liberal attitude to exploration with an accompanying high rate of negative results (up to 50% in women) has been accepted in the hope of preventing perforation
- In this study perforating and non-perforating appendicitis seemed to be different entities, and spontaneously resolving appendicitis was common
- The readiness to explore influences the detection of resolving appendicitis and may explain variations in incidence of appendicitis and perforation rate
- Perforation rate is useless as a measure of quality of management in suspected appendicitis
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Article
-
Appendicitis, mesenteric lymphadenitis, and subsequent risk of ulcerative colitis: cohort studies in Sweden and Denmark
- Morten Frisch, Bo V Pedersen, and Roland E Andersson
BMJ 2009 338: b716.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
COBBEN, L P, BAKKER, O J, PUYLAERT, J B, KINGMA, L M, BLICKMAN, J G
(2009). Imaging of patients with clinically suspected appendicitis in the Netherlands: conclusions of a survey. Br. J. Radiol.
82: 482-485
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Frisch, M., Pedersen, B. V, Andersson, R. E
(2009). Appendicitis, mesenteric lymphadenitis, and subsequent risk of ulcerative colitis: cohort studies in Sweden and Denmark. BMJ
338: b716-b716
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Kaplan, G. G, Pedersen, B. V, Andersson, R. E, Sands, B. E, Korzenik, J., Frisch, M.
(2007). The risk of developing Crohn's disease after an appendectomy: a population-based cohort study in Sweden and Denmark. Gut
56: 1387-1392
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Cope, J. U., Askling, J., Gridley, G., Mohr, A., Ekbom, A., Nyren, O., Linet, M. S.
(2003). Appendectomy During Childhood and Adolescence and the Subsequent Risk of Cancer in Sweden. Pediatrics
111: 1343-1350
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Andersson, R. E., Lambe, M.
(2001). Incidence of appendicitis during pregnancy. Int J Epidemiol
30: 1281-1285
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Andersson, R. E., Olaison, G., Tysk, C., Ekbom, A.
(2001). Appendectomy and Protection against Ulcerative Colitis. NEJM
344: 808-814
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Andersson, R., Lambe, M., Bergström, R.
(1999). Fertility patterns after appendicectomy: historical cohort study. BMJ
318: 963-967
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Andersson, R., Nystrom, P. O., Olaison, G., Moustafa, M.H., Kare, J., Frothingham, E. P., Newman, T. B., Rao, P. M.
(1998). Computed Tomography of the Appendix. NEJM
338: 1847-1848
[Full text]
-
Pratico, D., FitzGerald, G. A.
(1995). Testosterone and Thromboxane : Of Muscles, Mice, and Men. Circulation
91: 2694-2698
[Full text]
-
Siddiqui, M. A., Blumberg, M. S., Juhn, P. I., O'Toole, S. J., Karamanoukian, H. L., Glick, P. L., Welch, H. G., Koepsell, T. D., Andersson, R., Nystrom, P. O., Braveman, P., Egerter, S., Schecter, W.
(1995). Insurance and the Risk of Ruptured Appendix. NEJM
332: 395-398
[Full text]
-
(1994). APPENDICITIS: ARE THERE TWO KINDS?. JWatch General
1994: 3-3
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- laparoscopy or celioscopy
- Michael H Childress
bmj.com, 7 Sep 2002
[Full text]