BMJ  1993;307:409-413 (14 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.307.6901.409

Earliest electrocardiographic evidence of myocardial infarction: implications for thrombolytic treatment. The GREAT Group.

Cardiac Department, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary.

OBJECTIVES--To determine the incidence of the earliest electrocardiographic changes in patients with suspected myocardial infarction and their sensitivity and specificity for predicting the final diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN--Retrospective study of paired electrocardiograms recorded at home and on admission to hospital. SETTING--29 rural practices in Grampian and teaching hospitals in Aberdeen. PATIENTS--137 patients participating in the early anistreplase trial in the Grampian region, who received placebo at home and for whom paired electrocardiograms were available. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Classified electrocardiographic abnormalities and diagnosis at discharge. RESULTS--Electrocardiograms were recorded immediately before injection of placebo at home and anistreplase in hospital at median times of 110 and 240 minutes after the onset of symptoms. Definite or probable myocardial infarction was later confirmed in 93 (68%) patients. Of these, 66 (71%) had the same findings on both electrocardiograms of either ST elevation, bundle branch block, or a non-specific abnormality, while 27 (29%) showed a major change of classification between home and hospital recordings; 21 (23%) had ST elevation or bundle branch block on only one of the paired recordings. Although ST elevation was the commonest abnormality in the 93 patients with myocardial infarction, in only 51 was it recorded at home (sensitivity 55%) and in 49 on admission (sensitivity 53%). Of 57 patients with ST elevation at home, six did not have infarction (specificity 86%), while of 51 with ST elevation on admission, two did not have infarction (specificity 95%). CONCLUSIONS--Elevation of the ST segment is a transient electrocardiographic abnormality that has high specificity but low sensitivity for predicting the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction; it is an unsatisfactory precondition for giving thrombolytic treatment to patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Deciding who needs thrombolysis. Reserve thrombolysis for patients who would benefit.

T Levy
BMJ 1993 307: 798-800. [PDF]

Deciding who needs thrombolysis. Don't rush to widen criteria.

N Stephens
BMJ 1993 307: 798-800. [PDF]

Deciding who needs thrombolysis. A normal ECG means better prognosis.

R C Davis
BMJ 1993 307: 798-800. [PDF]

Deciding who needs thrombolysis. Validation of ECG diagnosis inadequate.

O M Jolobe
BMJ 1993 307: 798-800. [PDF]

Deciding who needs thrombolysis. Disappearing ST elevation could mean reperfusion.

J Byrne
BMJ 1993 307: 799-800. [PDF]

Deciding who needs thrombolysis. Domiciliary ECGs unreliable.

S M Haq and N I Jowett
BMJ 1993 307: 799-800. [PDF]

Deciding who needs thrombolysis. Acronyms must be explained.

T O Cheng
BMJ 1993 307: 799-800. [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardi, , Van de Werf, F., Ardissino, D., Betriu, A., Cokkinos, D. V., Falk, E., Fox, K. A.A., Julian, D., Lengyel, M., Neumann, F.-J., Ruzyllo, W., Thygesen, C., Underwood, S. R., Vahanian, A., Verheugt, F. W.A., Wijns, W. (2003). Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 24: 28-66 [Full text]  
• Menown, I.B.A, Mackenzie, G, Adgey, A.A.J (2000). Optimizing the initial 12-lead electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 21: 275-283 [Abstract]  
• Kellett, J., Clarke, J. (1995). Comparison of "Accelerated" Tissue Plasminogen Activator with Streptokinase for Treatment of Suspected Myocardial Infarction. Med Decis Making 15: 297-310 [Abstract]  

Online poll

Find out more here>> and here>>