Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986;293:670-674 (13 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.293.6548.670
Randomised controlled trial of computer assisted management of hypertension in primary care.
N H McAlister,
H D Covvey,
C Tong,
A Lee,
E D Wigle
The hypothesis that general practitioners would obtain better
outcomes for patients with hypertension using a computer than
doctors not using a computer was tested. Sixty family physicians
were randomised to two treatment strategies. "Test" physicians
completed a data collection form after each visit from a patient
with hypertension and mailed the forms to the test centre for
processing. Computer feedback on management was mailed to the
doctors. This encouraged doctors to apply the "stepped care"
protocol, supplied charts of diastolic blood pressure v time,
and ranked patients' diastolic blood pressures by percentile.
Letters were mailed to patients to remind them of appointments.
"Control" doctors filled out the same data collection forms
as test physicians, but neither doctors nor patients received
computer feedback. Physicians who used the computer saw more
patients per practice than control doctors (test 50 patients,
control 40). For all patients the length of follow up was significantly
longer in test practices (test 199 days, control 167), and a
smaller percentage dropped out of active treatment in test practices
(test 37.5%, control 42.1%). For patients with "moderate" hypertension
of a baseline diastolic pressure of greater than 104 mm Hg the
mean score of the last recorded pressure was below the goal
of 90 mm Hg in test practices (88.5 mm Hg), but it failed to
reach this goal in control practices (93.3 mm Hg). A greater
average reduction of diastolic pressure was achieved in test
practices (test 21.7 mm Hg, control 16.7 mm Hg). Though patients
with "moderate" hypertension were better controlled in test
practices than in control practices, the patients in test practices
visited their doctors less often (test 13.3 visits per patient-year,
control 17.4 visits). Among patients with newly detected hypertension
test practices achieved a greater reduction in diastolic pressure
than control practices (test 15.1 mm Hg v control 11.3 mm Hg)
and more sustained control of hypertension (test 323 days per
patient-year with a diastolic pressure of 90 mm Hg or less v
control 259 days).

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Jafar, T. H., Hatcher, J., Poulter, N., Islam, M., Hashmi, S., Qadri, Z., Bux, R., Khan, A., Jafary, F. H., Hameed, A., Khan, A., Badruddin, S. H., Chaturvedi, N., for the Hypertension Research Group,
(2009). Community-Based Interventions to Promote Blood Pressure Control in a Developing Country: A Cluster Randomized Trial. ANN INTERN MED
151: 593-601
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Hunt, D. L., Haynes, R. B., Hanna, S. E., Smith, K.
(1998). Effects of Computer-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Physician Performance and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review. JAMA
280: 1339-1346
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Balas, E. A., Austin, S. M., Mitchell, J. A., Ewigman, B. G., Bopp, K. D., Brown, G. D.
(1996). The Clinical Value of Computerized Information Services: A Review of 98 Randomized Clinical Trials. Arch Fam Med
5: 271-278
[Abstract]
-
Davis, D. A., Thomson, M. A., Oxman, A. D., Haynes, R. B.
(1995). Changing Physician Performance: A Systematic Review of the Effect of Continuing Medical Education Strategies. JAMA
274: 700-705
[Abstract]
-
Haynes, R. B., Walker, C. J.
(1987). Computer-Aided Quality Assurance: A Critical Appraisal. Arch Intern Med
147: 1297-1301
[Abstract]