Br Med J  1970;1:7-11 (3 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.1.5687.7

Royal Free Epidemic of 1955: A Reconsideration

Colin P. McEvedy, A. W. Beard

From a re-analysis of the case notes of patients with Royal Free disease it is concluded that there is little evidence of an organic disease affecting the central nervous system and that epidemic hysteria is a much more likely explanation. The data which support this hypothesis are the high attack rate in females compared with males; the intensity of the malaise compared with the slight pyrexia; the presence of subjective features similar to those seen in a previous epidemic of hysterical overbreathing; the glove-and-stocking distribution of the anaesthesia; and the normal findings in special investigations. Finally, a deliberate attempt by one of the authors to produce an electromyographic record similar to that reported in Royal Free disease was successful.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Hooper, M (2007). Myalgic encephalomyelitis: a review with emphasis on key findings in biomedical research. J. Clin. Pathol. 60: 466-471 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Small, G. W., Feinberg, D. T., Steinberg, D., Collins, M. T. (1994). A Sudden Outbreak of Illness Suggestive of Mass Hysteria in Schoolchildren. Arch Fam Med 3: 711-716 [Abstract]  
  • Small, G. W., Nicholi, A. M. Jr (1982). Mass Hysteria Among Schoolchildren: Early Loss as a Predisposing Factor. Arch Gen Psychiatry 39: 721-724 [Abstract]  
  • Graybill, J. R., Silva, J. Jr., O'Brien, M. S., Reinarz, J. A. (1972). Epidemic Neuromyasthenia: A Syndrome or Disease?. JAMA 219: 1440-1443 [Abstract]  
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ