Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:389 (19 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7488.389
Carlos Martinez, epidemiologist1, Stephan Rietbrock, epidemiologist1, Lesley Wise, epidemiologist2, Deborah Ashby, professor of medical statistics3, Jonathan Chick, consultant psychiatrist4, Jane Moseley, epidemiologist2, Stephen Evans, professor of pharmacoepidemiology5, David Gunnell, professor of epidemiology6
1 General Practice Research Database Division, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London SW8 5NQ, 2 Post-Licensing Division, Medicine and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, 3 Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary, University of London, 4 Department of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, 5 Medical Statistics Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, 6 Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR
Correspondence to: C Martinez carlos.martinez{at}gprd.de
Design Nested case-control study.
Setting Primary care in the United Kingdom.
Participants 146 095 individuals with a first prescription of an antidepressant for depression.
Main outcome measures Suicide and non-fatal self harm.
Results 1968 cases of non-fatal self harm and 69 suicides occurred. The overall adjusted odds ratio of non-fatal self harm was 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.86 to 1.14) and that of suicide 0.57 (0.26 to 1.25) in people prescribed SSRIs compared with those prescribed tricyclic antidepressants. We found little evidence that associations differed over time since starting or stopping treatment. We found some evidence that risks of non-fatal self harm in people prescribed SSRIs compared with those prescribed tricyclic antidepressants differed by age group (interaction P = 0.02). The adjusted odds ratio of non-fatal self harm for people prescribed SSRIs compared with users of tricylic antidepressants for those aged 18 or younger was 1.59 (1.01 to 2.50), but no association was apparent in other age groups. No suicides occurred in those aged 18 or younger currently or recently prescribed tricyclic antidepressants or SSRIs.
Conclusion We found no evidence that the risk of suicide or non-fatal self harm in adults prescribed SSRIs was greater than in those prescribed tricyclic antidepressants. We found some weak evidence of an increased risk of non-fatal self harm for current SSRI use among those aged 18 or younger. However, preferential prescribing of SSRIs to patients at higher risk of suicidal behaviour cannot be ruled out.
The most comprehensive studies of suicidal behaviour are based on data from the General Practice Research Database.4 5 The first found some evidence of an increased risk of suicide among people prescribed fluoxetine,4 but the drug's safety in overdose may have led to selective prescription to people at risk of self harm. The other study found no notable differences between a range of antidepressants and risk of fatal or non-fatal suicidal behaviour.5 However, the study was not restricted to patients treated for depression and examined only four antidepressants.
We report a nested case-control study, based on the General Practice Research Database, of patients with a new diagnosis of depression who were prescribed antidepressants for the first time between 1995 and 2001. We compared the risk of non-fatal self harm and suicide in association with the use of SSRIs and tricyclic antidepressants.
We identified depression by a set of Read and Oxford Medical Information System (OXMIS) medical terms indicative of depression, bipolar disorder, or dysthymic disorder. We classed severity of depression as mild, moderate, or severe (see bmj.com). We categorised antidepressants into three classes: tricyclic and related antidepressants, SSRIs, and other antidepressants (see bmj.com).
We studied two outcomes, non-fatal self harm and suicide, using the relevant medical terms, review of the patient's free text notes, and death certificates when available (around 60% of cases).
We selected a random sample of up to 20 controls for each case from the cohort, matching for sex, year of birth within one year, and duration of cohort membership. We derived the duration of prescriptions from the quantity of drug prescribed and the daily dose plus an additional seven day washout period (see bmj.com).
Data analysis
We classified the cases and controls as currently or previously exposed to an SSRI, tricyclic antidepressant, or other antidepressant, or co-exposed to more than one antidepressant, according to the exposure status on the index day (day of self harm or suicide or equivalent control day). We standardised the incidence rates to the UK population in 2001.
We assessed risks associated with "current exposure" by using multivariable conditional logistic regression controlling for a range of possible confounding factors (see bmj.com). We investigated whether risk varied in relation to duration of current use of antidepressants, time since stopping treatment, and age at entry to the cohort (10-18, 19-30, and > 30). We stratified by the duration of exposure (days) to antidepressants and time since discontinuation. In all comparisons, we compared SSRI monotherapy with tricylic antidepressant monotherapy for the same duration of exposure.
|
The strongest predictors of non-fatal self harm were a history of self harm, referral to a psychiatrist, alcohol misuse, and drug misuse. The strongest predictors for suicide were a history of non-fatal self harm, antipsychotic therapy, number of antidepressants prescribed in the previous year, alcohol misuse, and referral to a psychiatrist.
Over the study period, 1968 people had a recorded episode of non-fatal self harm: 1344 were exposed to antidepressant medication at the time, and 624 had stopped treatment before the episode. Drug overdose accounted for most episodes of non-fatal self harm (81%). The incidence rate of non-fatal self harm, standardised by age and sex, per 100 000 person years of follow up among people prescribed antidepressants was 2894 (95% confidence interval 2618 to 3170). The rate per 100 000 person years for men was 2834 (2579 to 3089) and for women was 2952 (2471 to 3432).
Overall, 69 suicides took place (56 men, 13 women); 36 of those people were taking antidepressants at the time of death. The overall standardised incidence rate for suicide was 62 (40 to 85) per 100 000 person years; in men this was 117 (72 to 163) and in women 9 (1 to 18).
The adjusted odds ratio for non-fatal self harm among SSRI users compared with users of tricyclic antidepressants was 0.99 (0.86 to 1.14). We found no evidence that the risk of non-fatal self harm varied among the different individual SSRIs or tricyclic antidepressants (P = 0.35 and P = 0.69, respectively) and no evidence of an increased risk of suicide associated with use of SSRIs compared with tricyclic antidepressants (odds ratio 0.57, 0.26 to 1.25; table 2).
|
We found borderline evidence that the risk of non-fatal self harm (P for interaction = 0.05), but not suicide (P for interaction = 0.73), differed between the different antidepressant categories in relation to time since starting therapy. This association showed no clear pattern.
We found evidence of a difference in risk of non-fatal self harm for current SSRI users compared with current users of tricyclic antidepressants in relation to age (P for interaction = 0.02), with an increased risk associated with SSRI use among those aged 18 or younger, but not in 19 to 30 year olds or those older than 30 (table 3).
|
In people aged 18 or younger, we found no evidence of any difference in risk of non-fatal self harm between individual tricyclic antidepressants, but among SSRIs (figure), the greatest risk was in relation to paroxetine use.
|
The risk of non-fatal self harm or suicide did not seem to differ between or within antidepressant classes according to the time since stopping treatment (see bmj.com).
We found no strong evidence of variability in the risk of non-fatal self harm between substances or between drug classes associated with time since starting or stopping antidepressant therapy. However, in patients aged 18 or younger, we found the risk of non-fatal self harm was higher in people prescribed SSRIs than with tricyclic antidepressants. In this age group, we found a weak indication that the risk of non-fatal self harm among users of the SSRIs studied is highest in those who used paroxetine. These findings are in keeping with those of Jick et al.5
Limitations
SSRIs are relatively non-toxic in overdose; it is possible that they were selectively given to individuals at higher risk of overdose and that SSRI overdose did not result in presentation to hospital or general practice. Previous self harm is an important predictor of further self harm and suicide. The prevalence of recorded past self harm among study members who harmed themselves (< 5%) is considerably lower than reported among case series of people who harmed themselves (50%)6 and completed suicides (30% to 47%),7 which indicates the possibility of residual confounding if non-fatal self harm is recorded differentially for SSRIs compared with tricyclic antidepressants. Three other limitations are worth noting. Firstly, we assumed prescribing to be a marker for exposure, but not all prescriptions are dispensed, and some of those dispensed are not taken. Secondly, it is possible that some associations may be chance findings. Thirdly, we did not deal with the question of whether people treated with SSRIs are at greater risk of self harm than those with equivalent morbidity who do not receive treatment. We have assessed risk only relative to people receiving tricyclic antidepressants.
Representativeness of the study
The suicide rate in our study (62 per 100 000 patient years) was higher than in the general population (9 per 100 000 people). The incidence of non-fatal self harm was seven times higher than that of around 400/100 000 in 1995 reported in Oxford.8 The ratio of cases of non-fatal to fatal self harm (approximately 30:1) in our study approximates to the ratio of the estimated number of hospital presenting episodes of self harm (n = 142 000)8 and suicides in the general population of England and Wales (n = 5000).9
Potential biases
Our findings for people younger than 19 are consistent with the results from randomised controlled trials,2
3 but they may have resulted from confounding by indication. For example, patients with personality disorders and adjustment disorders may be given a diagnosis of depression in primary care and be prescribed SSRIs.
Strengths of the study
The main strengths are the large sample size, detailed exposure data, and confounder information. Our study covered 1995 to 2001 and patients with a first prescription of antidepressants in this period. Furthermore, our approach to the ascertainment of cases of non-fatal self harm and suicides gives us considerably more power than previous studies.
|
We have endeavoured to control as closely as possible for factors that may be associated both with the risk of suicidal behaviour and the choice of antidepressant.
Conclusion
As prescribing to adults accounts for over 95% of antidepressant use in the United Kingdom, our finding that SSRIs and tricyclic antidepressants have a similar risk profile with respect to suicide and non-fatal self harm is reassuring. It is possible, however, that any adverse or protective effects are common to all classes of antidepressants. Further research, based on large randomised trials, should assess the long term and short term risk and benefits of antidepressants and compare these with non-pharmacological therapies for depression in adults.
Editorial by Cipriani et al and pp 385, 396
A classification system for the severity of depression, the method used to measure exposure to antidepressants, and supplemental tables are on bmj.com
This is the abridged version; the full version is on bmj.com
We thank the ongoing dedicated contribution of clinical and support staff in the general practices, which supply data for the General Practice Research Database, and of the National Vision User Group; E M Bain for help in coding the severity of depression; Klaus Ebmeier for helpful comments on the classification of the antidepressant drug classes; and members of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency Expert Working Group on SSRIs for comments on design, presentation, and methods.
Funding: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.
Competing interests: The UK Committee on Safety of Medicines established an expert working group to conduct areview of the safety of SSRIs. No members of the expert working group have financial interests in any of the companies that hold marketing authorisations for SSRIs. The MHRA funded the study and professional staff at the MHRA, including JM and LW, have been acting as secretariat to or observers on the expert working group's review. Neither JM nor LW have any personal financial interests in any drug product. DG, JC, and DA are members of the MHRA's expert working group on the safety of SSRIs, and DA is a member of the Committee on Safety of Medicines. They act as independent advisers, receiving travel expenses and a small fee for meeting attendance and reading materials in preparation for the meeting. DA has spoken on the methodology of adverse drugs reactions in HIV at a scientific meeting attended by several pharmaceutical companies and sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). A honorarium was paid to her department. SE has no personal interests to declare. His department receives funding from many pharmaceutical companies, including GSK, but mainly for methodological research. SE has no direct involvement in any of this. The General Practice Research Database Division receives funding for services, including the conduct of commissioned research, from a wide range of public sector bodies and the pharmaceutical industry. CM and SR have no competing interests to declare.
Ethical approval: General Practice Research Database Scientific and Ethical Advisory Group.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?