Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:1312 (4 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.38258.566262.7C (published 23 November 2004)
Philip J Steer, professor1, Mark P Little, senior lecturer2, Tina Kold-Jensen, lecturer2, Jean Chapple, honorary senior lecturer2, Paul Elliott, professor2
1 Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London SW10 9NH, 2 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, London W2 1PG
Correspondence to: P Steer p.steer{at}imperial.ac.uk
Design Prospective study.
Setting 15 maternity units in one London health region, 1988-2000.
Participants 210 814 first singleton births of babies weighing more than 200 g among mothers with no hypertension before 20 weeks' gestation and without proteinuria, delivering between 24 and 43 weeks' gestation.
Main outcome measures Birth weight and perinatal mortality.
Results The mean (SD) birth weight of babies born to mothers with no hypertension before 20 weeks' gestation or proteinuria was 3282 g (545 g) and there were 1335 perinatal deaths, compared with 94 perinatal deaths among women with proteinuria or a history of hypertension. Diastolic blood pressure at booking for antenatal checks was progressively higher from weeks 34 to 40 of gestation. The birth weight of babies being delivered after 34 weeks was highest for highest recorded maternal diastolic blood pressures of between 70 and 80 mm Hg and lower for blood pressures outside this range. Both low and high diastolic blood pressures were associated with statistically significantly higher perinatal mortality. Using a linear quadratic model, 94 of 825 (11.4%) perinatal deaths could be attributed to mothers having blood pressure differing from the optimal blood pressure (82.7 mm Hg) predicted by the fitted model. Most of these excess deaths occurred with blood pressures below the optimal value.
Conclusion Both low and high diastolic blood pressures in women during pregnancy are associated with small babies and high perinatal mortality.
Blood pressure was recorded during the first and subsequent antenatal checks. In 1988, clinicians mostly recorded diastolic blood pressure using the Korotkoff phase IV heart sound. Since 1988 there has been a gradual change to using the Korotkoff phase V heart sound.
When women delivered, the midwives determined the diastolic blood pressure and gestational age recorded at the first antenatal check and the highest diastolic blood pressure during pregnancy.
We defined perinatal mortality as a stillbirth (death before birth at, or after, 28 weeks' gestation until October 1992, and 24 weeks thereafter) or the death of a baby in its first week of life. We cross checked deaths against national death registrations and data from the Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Death in Infancy.7
Along with data on gestational age at booking for antenatal checks and birth and persistent important proteinuria, we recorded the mothers' ethnic group, smoking status, height, weight, age at booking, and any major medical disorders.
Statistical analysis
We calculated the body mass index of each woman and her Carstairs' deprivation score.8 For diastolic blood pressure and birth weight we adjusted for mother's ethnic group, smoking status, age at booking for antenatal checks, Carstairs' score, and height and weight. We adjusted blood pressure measurements for calendar year because of the secular shift from the Korotkoff phase IV to phase V heart sound.
We fitted log linear models to explore the relations between diastolic blood pressure and gestational age at booking and between highest maternal diastolic blood pressure and birth weight; logistic models were used to model perinatal mortality in relation to these variables (see bmj.com).
Analysis of diastolic blood pressures at booking for antenatal checks and weeks of gestation among 169 249 women when both were recorded showed a mean diastolic blood pressure of 66.6 mm Hg in the first trimester and 66.3 mm Hg in the second trimester. It was progressively higher after 34 weeks' gestation, reaching 68.4 mm Hg by
40 weeks' gestation. This was after adjustment for the mother's ethnic group, smoking status, height and weight, calendar year, age at booking, and Carstairs' score: similar changes were observed in the unadjusted data.
At 34 weeks' gestation or more, there was an inverted U shaped relation between birth weight and blood pressure, with a maximum birth weight at around 80 mm Hg (fig 1). When birth weight was adjusted for maternal height and weight, the relation remained similar. The relation of birth weight with blood pressure could not be explained by confounding by gestational age. When we reanalysed the data only for women with spontaneous onset of labour at term (37-42 weeks' gestation), we found no material change in the results.
|
Birth weight in relation to rises in blood pressure during pregnancy depended on the blood pressure at booking. A blood pressure of 70 mm Hg or more at booking was associated with the highest birth weights as long as the blood pressure rise during pregnancy did not exceed 10 mm Hg; with rises greater than this, birth weight fell sharply. If the blood pressure at booking was less than 70 mm Hg, birth weight rose as the rise became greater, but started to fall again if the rise exceeded 30 mm Hg.
Perinatal mortality showed a strong curvilinear association with highest diastolic blood pressure (fig 2). In particular, if linear quadratic models were fitted to the data, the quadratic term was highly statistically significantly different from zero and remained so even when we excluded women with highest diastolic pressures of less than 60 mm Hg. This relation largely disappeared if corrected for birth weight (fig 2). Of the 824 perinatal deaths contributing to this analysis, we estimated that 94.3 (11.4%) were attributable to women with blood pressure differing from the optimal blood pressure (82.7 mm Hg) predicted by the linear quadratic model; most (91.2%) of these excess perinatal deaths (86.1) occurred among women with lower blood pressures, mainly in the ranges 70-79 mm Hg (51.2 excess deaths) and 60-69 mm Hg (30.9 excess deaths). Perinatal mortality still exhibited a strong curvilinear association with highest diastolic blood pressure when we included women with proteinuria or chronic hypertension (see bmj.com).
|
|
From 34 weeks' gestation onwards, birth weight was maximal when the highest recorded blood pressure during pregnancy was between 70 and 90 mm Hg diastolic. The relation was an inverted U shape, so that both higher and lower blood pressures were associated with lower birth weights.
A positive quadratic (U shaped) association was also seen with perinatal mortality, largely mediated through the association of blood pressure with birth weight. The size of our database confers high statistical power. We included over 1300 perinatal deaths, which is five and 14 times larger than the two largest previous studies.5 14
Our findings support two previous small studies of women with low blood pressure in pregnancy that found lower birth weights and an increase in preterm deliveries4 and small for gestational age babies.2 In another study, birth weight was related to low blood pressure as well as high blood pressure in the third trimester.5 In a controlled trial to prevent pre-eclampsia, atenolol produced a significant reduction in the incidence of pre-eclampsia but also reduced mean birth weight15; in a meta-analysis of antihypertensives in pregnancy, a mean diastolic blood pressure lower by 10 mm Hg or more was associated with an increased risk of small for gestational age babies.16
A high blood pressure at booking is advantageous for birth weight as long as there is only a small rise (< 15 mm Hg) in blood pressure thereafter. If the blood pressure at booking is low (70 mm Hg or less), however, a rise of 15-30 mm Hg is beneficial. This supports the concept that the rise in blood pressure in the third trimester is advantageous for fetal growth and may be a response to placental function failing to keep pace with fetal growth.
Strengths of our study include the large number of women studied and their geographical coherence. A potential weakness is that the data were collected as part of routine obstetric practice, with the variability that implies. Women with high blood pressure in pregnancy are more likely to have received interventions such as early induction of labour, thereby reducing the incidence of high blood pressure and increasing the risk of low birthweight babies. This would overestimate the effect of high blood pressure on low birth weight. Separate analysis of data from women with spontaneous onset of labour at term, however, gave essentially unchanged results. Women with low blood pressure were more likely to have booked late for antenatal care and therefore to have fewer antenatal checks, but the differences were slight.
This is the abridged version of an article that was posted on bmj.com on 23 November 2004: http://bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.38258.566262.7C We thank the midwives who entered the data and the supportive clinicians and data guardians at the participating maternity units.
Contributors: See bmj.com
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethical approval: This study was approved by the St Mary's NHS Trust local research ethics committee.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses