Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:89 (10 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.38132.503472.7C (published 24 June 2004)
Christine Powell, senior lecturer1, Helen Baker-Henningham, lecturer2, Susan Walker, professor1, Jacqueline Gernay, health systems and services development advisor3, Sally Grantham-McGregor, professor4
1 Epidemiology Research Unit, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston, Jamaica, 2 Department of Educational Studies, University of the West Indies, 3 Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization, Kingston, Jamaica, 4 Centre for International Child Health, Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH
Correspondence to: C Powell christine.powell{at}uwimona.edu.jm
Design Cluster randomised controlled trial.
Setting 18 clinics in three Jamaican parishes.
Participants 139 undernourished children aged 9 to 30 months and their mothers enrolled in intervention or control clinics.
Interventions Weekly home visits by community health aides for one year in addition to usual duties. Parenting issues were discussed with the mothers and play activities were demonstrated with the children using homemade materials.
Main outcome measures Children's scores on the Griffiths mental development scales and mothers' knowledge and practices of childrearing.
Results Children from the intervention group showed significant improvements in development: developmental quotient, 7.8 points (95% confidence interval 4.5 to 11.1); hearing and speech, 10.7 points (5.9 to 15.4); hand and eye coordination, 6.8 points (3.4 to 10.1); and performance subscale, 11.0 points (5.6 to 16.4). No improvements were shown on the locomotor subscale. The mothers from the intervention group showed improved knowledge and practices of childrearing. Change in body mass index and height independently affected change in development.
Conclusion Integrating parenting skills and early psychosocial stimulation for undernourished children into primary care was feasible and effective in improving the children's development and mothers' knowledge and practices of childrearing.
Outcome measures and intervention
The children's developmental levels were assessed with the Griffiths mental development scales at baseline and one year later.4
5 We used four subscaleslocomotor skills, hearing and speech, hand and eye coordination, and performance. These were averaged to give a global developmental quotient. Higher scores indicate better development. The children were assessed by one of two people, blinded to allocation group.
The children's weights and lengths or heights were measured by standard procedures. Mothers' knowledge and practices of childrearing were assessed by questionnaires at baseline and one year later. The questionnaire on knowledge was specifically developed for our study. It comprises 20 questions on feeding practices and activities likely to promote language and cognitive development in children. Higher scores are associated with better knowledge. The responses were summed (maximum score 70). The questionnaire on childrearing practices comprised 15 questions to assess how often the mother involved her child in a range of activities, such as singing and playing games. The items were summed (maximum score 62).
On enrolment a researcher visited the homes and collected information on socioeconomic background, mother's height, and her verbal IQ.6
Over one year the community health aides visited the homes weekly and demonstrated play activities. Homemade materials were used to reduce the cost of the intervention. The aides followed a structured curriculum.7 8 Toys were left in the homes and exchanged at each visit. Parenting issues were discussed.
Statistical analysis
All analyses were conducted on an intention to treat basis. Multilevel multiple regression analysis was used to examine the effect of intervention, taking into account the hierarchical structure of the study. Clinic was entered as a random variable to account for the variance among clinics. Separate regressions were computed to examine the treatment effect on developmental quotient and each subscale score, mothers' knowledge and practices of childrearing, final weight, length, and body mass index. We entered the initial measure in each analysis to assess change. Covariates were offered and treatment group (intervention, n = 1; control, n = 0) entered in the final step.
|
The intervention had significant benefits on the children's development: 7.8 developmental quotient points (95% confidence interval 4.5 to 11.1); hearing and speech, 10.7 points (5.9 to 15.4), hand and eye coordination, 6.8 points (3.4 to 10.1), and performance, 11.0 points (5.6 to 16.4; table 2). The intervention showed a significant benefit on mothers' knowledge of childrearing (7.6 points, 5.7 to 9.4) and childrearing practices (5.0 points, 1.6 to 8.4). Growth did not modify the effects of intervention, but change in length and body mass index predicted the developmental quotient.
|
|
National governments would need to commit some resources to enable child development activities to be integrated into primary healthcare services and for them to be sustainable. Additional training, a coordinator and materials would be required. We determined that each aide could visit 3-5 children in addition to usual duties, which would take about half a day. The cost and workload of similar paraprofessionals varies by country, and the number of children served would depend on this. As there was a limit to the number of children who could be visited, the programme would be most suitable for those at high risk.
This is the abridged version of an article that was posted on bmj.com on 24 June 2004: http://bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.38132.503472.7C We thank research assistants Pauline Alcott, Ava Mundell, Joan Thomas, and Michael Ennis, the public health nurses, the community health aides, the clinic staff, and the parents and children who participated in the study.
Funding: This study was supported by the Thrasher Research Fund, USA, with subsidiary grants from the British High Commission's Department for International Development, Jamaica, and the University of the West Indies Mona Campus Research and Publication fund. The Ministry of Health, Jamaica, supported the community health aides. This work was undertaken in collaboration with Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, which receives a proportion of its funding from the NHS Executive.
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethical approval: University of the West Indies ethics committee and the Ministry of Health, Jamaica.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses