Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:983 (24 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.38050.593634.63 (published 17 March 2004)
Hyeon Chang Kim, instructor1, Chung Mo Nam, associate professor1, Sun Ha Jee, assistant professor2, Kwang Hyub Han, professor3, Dae Kyu Oh, director4, Il Suh, professor1
1 Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 134 Shinchon-Dong, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea, 2 Graduate School of Health Science and Management, Yonsei University, Seoul, 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 4 Bureau of Health Promotion, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea
Correspondence to: I Suh isuh{at}yumc.yonsei.ac.kr
Design Prospective cohort study.
Setting Korea Medical Insurance Corporation study with eight years' follow up.
Participants 94 533 men and 47 522 women aged 35-59 years.
Main outcome measure Mortality from liver diseases according to death certificate.
Results There was a positive association between the aminotransferase concentration, even within normal range (35-40 IU/l), and mortality from liver disease. Compared with the concentration < 20 IU/l, the adjusted relative risks for an aspartate aminotransferase concentration of 20-29 IU/l and 30-39 IU/l were 2.5 (95% confidence interval 2.0 to 3.0) and 8.0 (6.6 to 9.8) in men and 3.3 (1.7 to 6.4) and 18.2 (8.1 to 40.4) in women, respectively, The corresponding risks for alanine aminotransferase were 2.9 (2.4 to 3.5) and 9.5 (7.9 to 11.5) in men and 3.8 (1.9 to 7.7) and 6.6 (1.5 to 25.6) in women, respectively. According to receiver operating characteristic curves the best cut-off values for the prediction of liver disease in men were 31 IU/l for aspartate aminotransferase and 30 IU/l for alanine aminotransferase.
Conclusion People with slightly increased aminotransferase activity, but still within the normal range, should be closely observed and further investigated for liver diseases.
Data collectionWe obtained baseline information from the health examinations in 1990 and 1992 and the self reported questionnaire in 1992. The outcome variable was mortality from death certificates. The follow up period was eight years (1993-2000). In the survival analyses, of the deaths from liver diseases as recorded on the death certificates, we used data only for those patients who had previously been admitted to hospital with liver disease. Information on hospital admissions was obtained from the health insurance claim data.
Statistical analysisWe classified participants according to body mass index; serum total cholesterol concentration; plasma glucose concentration; blood pressure; smoking; alcohol consumption; and family history of liver disease. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to control for age and the above variables. We plotted the receiver operating characteristic curve of the serum aminotransferase concentration for the detection of future mortality from liver disease.
|
The association between aminotransferase concentration and mortality in men was continuous and positive (table 2). The association between the aminotransferase concentration and mortality from liver disease was significant, even within the current normal limits. Compared with the lowest concentration (< 20 IU/l), the risks for mortality from liver disease for aspartate and alanine aminotransferase concentrations at 20-29 IU/l (only in men) and 30-39 IU/l were significantly increased (table 2).
|
We estimated that the best cut-off values for identifying men who are risk of death from liver disease were 31 IU/l for aspartate aminotransferase and 30 IU/l for alanine aminotransferase. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.83 and 0.78, respectively (figure). We could not establish the cut-off value in women, but we would expect it to be lower than in men.
|
Mortality from liver disease and normal serum aminotransferase concentration
There could be several explanations for the increased risk of mortality in men with slightly increased but still normal enzyme concentrations. Firstly, mortality may be due to unrecognised liver diseases. Secondly, the relation may be due to other risk factors for liver disease such as obesity, alcohol consumption, serum cholesterol concentration, and plasma glucose concentration.3-5 Even after we adjusted for such risk factors, we observed an independent association between the aminotransferase concentration and mortality from liver disease. Thirdly, advanced chronic liver diseases with relatively low enzyme activity may contribute to the association. This is unlikely, however, as we excluded men with known liver diseases and used the average of two enzyme measurements at two year intervals.
Though we consistently observed an association between serum aminotransferase concentration and mortality from liver disease in men, we could not do so in women because mortality from liver diseases in woman is low.
Application of results
Recently, Prati et al proposed that the upper normal limit of serum alanine aminotransferase should be revised to 30 IU/l.2 The outcome of the application of the updated normal upper limit is increased sensitivity (76.3%) with acceptable specificity (88.5%) in identifying active C viral hepatitis during six month follow up.2 Our data agree with this report.
However, updating the current normal range remains controversial. Lowering the upper normal limits will increase the number of asymptomatic patients with abnormal aminotransferase concentration, which may increase the healthcare costs. The lower upper limit will limit blood supplies.6 People who repeatedly show increased aminotransferase concentrations according to the lowered normal upper limit should be further investigated by serum biochemistry, viral marker tests, and ultrasonography. The cost effectiveness of this approach still needs to be evaluated prospectively in various settings.
Strength and weakness
This study has several strong points. Firstly, it was performed with a large population (142 055 people) and had a long follow up period (eight years). Previous studies have had a cross sectional design or short follow up period, and they failed to investigate the association between serum aminotransferase concentration and long term mortality.2
7-9 Secondly, the results can be generalised to the broader Korean population and, perhaps, to other populations as well. While previous studies investigated special populations, such as blood donors and haemodialysis patients, our study cohort was recruited from the nationwide general population.2
7-9 Thirdly, the use of repeated measurements of variables decreased the possibility of measurement error or misclassification bias. Finally, to increase the validity of the causes of death, we verified morality from liver diseases by reviewing data on hospital admissions.
Potential limitations of this study include the brief information on pre-existing diseases, lack of other laboratory tests for liver diseases, and nonstandardised aminotransferase assays. Firstly, as the objective medical history of the study population was not available, we used the information provided by participants. We excluded people who indicated that they had any previously known diseases. We also assessed the confounding effects of unknown preexisting disease by comparing the results by different follow up periods and found no association. Secondly, we did not study viral marker or perform liver function tests other than aminotransferase assays in the baseline examination. Individuals with family history of liver disease are at high risk of the chronic hepatitis B virus infection because the infection is common in Korea, 5-10% in men and 1-5% in women, and transmitted horizontally in high frequency.10 11 We assessed the effects of the family history of liver disease using a stratified analysis. The results showed that family history of liver diseases did not alter the outcome of the study. Thirdly, 419 hospitals over the country conducted the health examination and the serum aminotransferase assay was not standardised. All hospitals, however, followed the internal and external quality control procedures as stipulated by the Korean Society of Quality Control in Clinical Pathology. The misclassification bias, if any, is likely to be non-differential reduction of the relative risk. Hence, the results are unlikely to be distorted by measurement error.
Conclusion
Our findings indicate that serum aminotransferase concentration is associated with mortality from liver disease, even within the current normal range. The adjustment of the normal limit of serum aminotransferase may be necessary, especially in populations in which liver diseases are common.
|
This is the abridged version of an article that was posted on bmj.com on 17 March 2004: http://bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.38050.593634.63 We thank the National Health Insurance Corporation (former the Korea Medical Insurance Corporation) for providing the data.
Contributors: See bmj.com
Funding: Supported, in part, by a grant from the 21C Frontier Functional Human Genome Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of Korea.
Competing interest: None declared.
Ethical approval: Institutional review board of Severance Hospital at Yonsei University.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care