Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;326:1124 (24 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7399.1124
F Verdon, general practitioner1, B Burnand, senior lecturer2, C-L Fallab Stubi, pharmacist3, C Bonard, general practitioner1, M Graff, general practitioner1, A Michaud, general practitioner1, T Bischoff, general practitioner1, M de Vevey, general practitioner1, J-P Studer, general practitioner1, L Herzig, general practitioner1, C Chapuis, general practitioner1, J Tissot, general practitioner1, A Pécoud, professor3, B Favrat, consultant of internal medicine3
1 General Practice Unit, University of Lausanne, rue du Bugnon 44, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland, 2 Health Care Evaluation Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Lausanne, 3 Medical Outpatient Clinic, University of Lausanne
Correspondence to: B Favrat bernard.favrat{at}hospvd.ch
Design Double blind randomised placebo controlled trial.
Setting Academic primary care centre and eight general practices in western Switzerland.
Participants 144 women aged 18 to 55, assigned to either oral ferrous sulphate (80 mg/day of elemental iron daily; n=75) or placebo (n=69) for four weeks.
Main outcome measures Level of fatigue, measured by a 10 point visual analogue scale.
Results 136 (94%) women completed the study. Most had a low serum
ferritin concentration;
20 µg/l in 69 (51%) women. Mean age,
haemoglobin concentration, serum ferritin concentration, level of fatigue,
depression, and anxiety were similar in both groups at baseline. Both groups
were also similar for compliance and dropout rates. The level of fatigue after
one month decreased by - 1.82/6.37 points (29%) in the iron group
compared with -0.85/6.46 points (13%) in the placebo group (difference 0.95
points, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 1.62; P=0.004). Subgroups analysis
showed that only women with ferritin concentrations
50 µg/l improved
with oral supplementation.
Conclusion Non-anaemic women with unexplained fatigue may benefit from iron supplementation. The effect may be restricted to women with low or borderline serum ferritin concentrations.
Randomisation, main outcome, and adherence to treatment
Our study was a pragmatic randomised placebo controlled trial. Participants
received either 80 mg/day oral long acting ferrous sulphate (Tardyferon;
Robapharm) or placebo for four weeks. Iron and placebo were identical in
appearance and taste and dose regimen. Randomisation took place at an
independent pharmacy, according to a pre-established list. Patients,
caregivers, and investigators were blinded to treatment assignment until the
end of the trial. Each drug package was coded with a unique number according
to the randomisation schedule and then posted to the relevant practice.
The main outcome was the level of fatigue perceived by patients, assessed
at baseline and after one month on a 10 point visual analogue scale, ranging
from 1 (no fatigue at all) to 10 (very severe fatigue). Also used was a
validated 24 item self administered questionnaire incorporating eight items
for each of three dimensions (fatigue, anxiety, and
depression).2 Each
item was scored on a visual analogue scale. A cumulative score was obtained
for each dimension by adding the eight item scores (range 0-40). The patients
were asked about any potential side effects and intercurrent physical,
psychological, and haemorrhagic events. Serum ferritin concentration and
adherence to treatment were measured and considered as intervening variables.
A complete blood count and serum ferritin concentration were obtained at
baseline. Clinicians could order other tests to rule out any disorder to
explain the fatigue. Serum ferritin concentration was measured after one month
in those patients whose initial value was
20 µg/l.
Adherence to treatment was measured by an electronic device, which recorded the date and time that the pill container was opened.3 Unused pills were also counted. Patients were asked not to take over the counter vitamin or iron supplements.
Statistical analysis
We calculated changes in symptom levels and scores over time for each
patient. The principal analysis was performed according to an intention to
treat protocol. Tests performed were two sample t tests,
2 tests, and linear regression analyses.
50 µg/l in 115 (85%)
patients and
20 µg/l in 69 (51%) patients. Scores for anxiety and
depression were low in both groups. The mean decrease in the overall intensity of fatigue between zero and one month was higher in the iron group than in the placebo group (table). By choosing a cut-off point of 50 µg/l, we found that there was no quantitatively significant response greater than 50 µg/l (P=0.64). The iron group showed the largest decrease in the cumulative score for fatigue (- 7.5 (8.0) v - 4.6 (7.5) points, difference 3.0 points, 0.3 to 5.6, P=0.03). The difference for depression was not statistically different between the two groups (- 2.1 (6) v - 1 (7) points, P=0.31), whereas a greater decrease in anxiety was observed in the iron group (- 1.7 (6) v 1.3 (6), P=0.003).
|
After adjustment for age, initial levels of depression and anxiety, and serum ferritin concentration in a multiple linear regression analysis, iron supplementation was the most important variable to be associated with the decrease in the overall intensity of fatigue, an effect corresponding to - 1 point on the visual analogue scale. Younger age was also associated with a larger decrease in the intensity of fatigue.
A multiple linear regression analysis in the iron group showed that age, initial levels of depression and anxiety, serum ferritin concentration, and haemoglobin concentration were not predictive of the mean decrease in the overall intensity of fatigue. The best predictor of response was the amount of pills consumed in the iron group, but this was not so in the placebo group.
Compliance and dropout rates were similar in both groups: 95% (12) v 98% (9), P=0.25) for compliance and 4 of 75 (5%) v 4 of 69 (6%) for dropout rates in the iron arm and placebo arm, respectively. After the intervention, serum ferritin concentrations were highest in the iron group (21.0 (SD 9.2) v 13.7 (6.9), P < 0.001).
Identifying iron deficiency without anaemia as a potential cause of fatigue is important. It may avoid the inappropriate attribution of symptoms to putative emotional causes or life stressors and thereby reduce unnecessary use of healthcare resources. Instituting iron therapy early may also improve quality of life.8
We found a significant response only in the patients with a baseline serum
ferritin concentration
50 µg/l. This suggests that iron deficiency
could be present even with a "normal" concentration of serum
ferritin. Indeed, the lower limit for serum ferritin concentration is
controversial: iron stores in the bone marrow may serve as a better indicator
of iron deficiency.9
The lower reference limits for serum ferritin and haemoglobin concentrations
have been considered too low for women and it has been suggested should be the
same as for
men.10
Iron deficiency even in the absence of anaemia is associated with decreased activity of iron dependent enzymes and therefore affects the metabolism of neurotransmitters.11 12 In people with iron deficiency anaemia the related symptoms will disappear more quickly than the accompanying increase in haematological indices.13 We did not, however, measure haemoglobin concentration after exposure to iron.
Limitations of study
Firstly, blinding for group assignment is an important issue, especially
with iron, because of the side effects. It was not possible to correct for the
change in stool colour by adding bismuth to the placebo because bismuth is an
active substance. To minimise the side effects we used a low dose iron
sulphate taken with breakfast. Participants in both groups were also told that
their drug could colour stools. We did not ask the participants to guess their
group assignment. In a recent placebo controlled trial no significant
differences in guesses about treatment were found between iron and placebo
groups despite the elemental iron dose used being three times that of our
study.6 We found no
difference in compliance between the two groups suggesting that the patients
did not recognise that they had been assigned to placebo. Secondly, we did not
have a procedure to control recruitment of all consecutive eligible patients,
because this would have been difficult to apply in a busy clinical practice.
Thirdly, ferritin concentration was the only measure of iron status in the
study because it is considered the best non-invasive indicator of iron
storage.14 Finally,
our primary outcome focused on fatigue, a patient centred subjective
measure.
|
This is an abridged
version; the full version is on
bmj.com We thank M Burnier for his contribution to the electronic monitoring of patient compliance and for his critique of the manuscript and W Ghali (University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada) for his comments on the revised manuscript.
Contributors: See bmj.com
Funding: This study was sponsored by Robapharm. The sponsor was not involved in the analysis of the results nor in writing or correcting the manuscript.
Competing interests: FV and BF received financial support from Robapharm for producing a preliminary report of the study.
Ethical approval: The study was approved by the ethical review committee for clinical research of the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Lausanne.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses