Primary care

Quality of care for elderly residents in nursing homes and elderly people living at home: controlled observational study

Tom Fahey, professor of primary care medicine ^a, Alan A Montgomery, lecturer in primary care health services research ^b, James Barnes, registrar ^c, Jo Protheroe, MRC training fellow in health services research ^d. 

^a Tayside Centre for General Practice, University of Dundee, Dundee DD2 4AD, ^b Division of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol, Bristol BS6 6JL, ^c Bradgate Surgery, Bristol BS10 6SP, ^d National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 6PL

Correspondence to: T Fahey
t.p.fahey{at}dundee.ac.uk

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

Objectives: To assess the quality of care given to elderly people and compare the care given to residents in nursing homes with those living in their own homes.
Design: Controlled observational study.
Setting: Primary care, Bristol.
Subjects: Elderly individuals (aged 65 years) registered with three general practices, of whom 172 were residents in nursing homes (cases) and 526 lived at home (matched controls).
Main outcome measures: The quality of clinical care given to patients was measured against explicit standards. Quality indicators were derived from national sources and agreed with participating general practitioners.
Results: The overall standard of care was inadequate when judged against the quality indicators, irrespective of where patients lived. The overall prescribing of beneficial drugs for some conditions was deficientfor example, only 38% (11/29) (95% confidence interval 20% to 58%) of patients were prescribed  blockers after myocardial infarction. The proportion of patients with heart disease or diabetes who had had their blood pressure measured in the past two years (heart disease) or past year (diabetes) was lower among those living in nursing homes: for heart disease, 74% (17/23) v 96% (122/127) (adjusted odds ratio 0.18, 0.04 to 0.75); for diabetes, 62% (8/13) v 96% (50/52) (adjusted odds ratio 0.05, 0.01 to 0.38). In terms of potentially harmful prescribing, significantly more patients in nursing homes were prescribed neuroleptic medication (28% (49/172) v 11% (56/526) (3.82, 2.37 to 6.17)) and laxatives (39% (67/172) v 16% (85/526) (2.79, 1.79 to 4.36)). Nursing home residents were less likely to have the appropriate diagnostic Read code linked to their prescribed neuroleptic drug (0.22, 0.07 to 0.71).
Conclusions: The quality of medical care that elderly patients receive in one UK city, particularly those in nursing homes, is inadequate. We suggest that better coordinated care for these patients would avoid the problems of overuse of unnecessary or harmful drugs, underuse of beneficial drugs, and poor monitoring of chronic disease.

What is already known on this topic Doctors too often prescribe harmful drugs and too seldom prescribe beneficial drugs for elderly people The quality of medical care for those living in nursing and residential homes has also been questioned What this study adds Elderly people in one UK city receive inadequate care when judged against explicit quality indicators Those living in nursing homes receive poorer care than those living at home in terms of underuse of beneficial drugs, poor monitoring of chronic disease, and overuse of inappropriate or unnecessary drugs

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

The number of elderly patients living in nursing homes rose substantially in the late 1980s and in the 1990s, resulting in a rise in workload for general practitioner responsible for the delivery of care to residents in these homes. ^{1 2} Concern has been expressed that the reduction in provision of long stay NHS beds for elderly people has increased the demand on general practitioners in this group of patients with high morbidity and disability. ^{1 2} In response to these demands, the arrangements made by general practices for delivering care to nursing homes seems to be inconsistent and idiosyncratic.³

More widespread concern has been expressed about drug treatment in elderly people⁴about the risks of excessive prescribing of, for example, inappropriate neuroleptic drugs⁵ and about the under-prescribing of potentially beneficial drugs.⁴

No study has examined the overall quality of care given to elderly patients in UK primary care or has judged the quality of care against agreed, explicit standards in patients living in nursing homes compared with patients living at home. We aimed to evaluate one dimension of qualityclinical care given to patients.⁶

	Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

Subjects
Three general practices with registered patients resident in four Bristol nursing homes agreed to participate in the study. TF provided care at one of these practices. All nursing home residents aged 65 years or over were identified from each practice's computerised list. In each practice, we randomly selected four patients who lived in their own homes to act as controls for each nursing home resident, stratifying by sex and age in 10-year bands. For strata with fewer than four controls per nursing home resident, we included all available control patients. We excluded patients with terminal illness.

Generation of quality indicators
We measured the quality of care given to patients against explicit quality standards or indicators, derived mostly from a recognised and recently published textbook.⁷ We selected the quality indicators on the basis of their relevance to general practice, and particularly care of elderly patients. We discussed and agreed with the general practitioners a set of quality indicators before starting the study (see the box on bmj.com).

Data collection
All the practices in the study use computer and paper patient records. We examined both formats for every patient. Data were extracted using a computerised data collection form. The following data were collected: Read code and diagnosis of up to 10 current problems; up to 15 currently prescribed drugs; influenza and pneumococcal immunisation, with date measured if the patient was diabetic; record of HbA_1c concentration if the patient was diabetic; blood pressure record if the patient had coronary artery disease, hypertension, or diabetes; and contraindications to aspirin or  blockers. Data were collected from November 2001 to February 2002.

Statistical analysis
Associations between residence (nursing home versus living at home) and the presence of quality indicators in patients' notes were investigated by using odds ratios. Using logistic regression, we adjusted crude odds ratios for age, sex, practice, and overall morbidity (indicated by the number of current problems and current drug treatment).

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

We identified 172 nursing home residents and 526 controls from the three practices. Among those aged 80 years or over, fewer than four controls per nursing home resident were available, so all controls were included. Nursing home residents were older and had slightly fewer current diagnosed problems but were prescribed more drugs.

Of the 698 patients, 162 did not have any record of having either received or been offered influenza vaccination for the current winter. The likelihood of receiving influenza vaccination was not associated with place of residence (table).

The table shows the distribution of quality indicators among the nursing home residents compared with the controls. Frequency of blood pressure measurement was poorer among nursing home residents than controls both among patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease and among patients with hypertension (odds ratio 0.18 (95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.75) and 0.20 (0.09 to 0.47) respectively). However, among patients with hypertension who had had their blood pressure measured in the past year, a higher proportion of nursing home residents than of controls had blood pressure <150/90 mm Hg, although this result was of only borderline significance. Among patients with coronary heart disease, there were no differences between the two groups for prescribing of either aspirin or  blockers.

In diabetic patients, recording of HbA_1c concentration was worse in the nursing home residents than in the controls, although this result was again of borderline significance; recording of blood pressure was also worse (0.05 (0.01 to 0.38)). However, mean (SD) HbA_1c concentrations in nursing home residents and controls (0.08 (0.02) v 0.08 (0.01) respectively; P=0.71) were similar, as were the proportions of patients with blood pressure <140/80 mm Hg. Nursing home residents were less likely than controls to have received or been offered pneumococcal vaccination (0.15 (0.03 to 0.70)), but the proportions of patients offered flu vaccine were similar.

Over a quarter (28% (49/172)) of nursing home residents were taking neuroleptic drugs, a significantly higher proportion than in the controls (11% (56/526); 3.82, 2.37 to 6.17). For patients taking neuroleptic medication, patient records were more likely to contain the appropriate diagnostic Read code if the patients were living at home (0.22 (0.07 to 0.71)). Only 10 patients in the whole study were currently being prescribed thioridazine, all of whom were nursing home residents.

Overall, about two fifths (39% (67/172)) of nursing home residents were currently prescribed a laxative, a significantly higher proportion than in the controls (16% (85/526); 2.79, 1.79 to 4.36). For patients prescribed a laxative, there was no difference in the recording of the appropriate Read code between the nursing home residents and those living at home.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

The results of this study suggest that elderly people in one UK city are receiving inadequate care. Inadequate care takes several different forms: insufficient use of beneficial drugs; poor monitoring of chronic disease; and overuse of inappropriate or unnecessary drugs. ^{4 8} We have shown that poor monitoring of disease and unnecessary drug prescribing are more likely to occur in nursing home residents than in people living at home, even after comorbidity and amount of prescribed medication are controlled for.

Context of other studies
In terms of prescribing beneficial treatment, the low level (38% (95% confidence interval 20% to 58%)) of  blocker prescribing in patients with a history of myocardial infarction is consistent with some studies^9-11 but not others.¹²

The overall prescribing of aspirin in coronary heart disease (61%) was lower than in some reports of clinical practice in the United Kingdom (reported as 80-90%), ^{10 13} but not in others.¹¹ In terms of the process of care for chronic disease, nursing home residents fared worse than their counterparts living at home for monitoring both of blood pressure and HbA_1c concentration, though the nursing home patients whose blood pressure was recorded seemed to have better control.

Our study has also confirmed suggestions of inappropriate drug use in elderly people, particularly those in nursing homes.⁴ The overall level of prescribing of neuroleptic drugs in nursing home residents (28%) was higher than levels reported in a previous survey among nursing home residents in Glasgow.⁵ Lastly, nursing home residents were almost three times as likely to receive a laxative as those living at home. Added to the fact that nursing home residents received on average more drug treatment than those living at home, concerns about overprescription of inappropriate drugs seem more likely in relation to nursing home residents.¹⁴

Study limitations
We did not measure other important dimensions of quality, such as access to care and how well health professionals relate to patients, particularly in terms of continuity of care.⁶ We did not examine the temporal relation between the process of care, comorbidity, and prescribing of drugs and did not control for the number of visits to the surgery or home visits to patients. We did not measure how recently a patient had been discharged from hospital, so a proportion of the prescribing in this study could be attributable to hospital doctors rather than general practitioners. A qualitative study design would be more appropriate for exploring elderly patients' (and their carers') expectations of care. Elderly people often have several chronic diseases and may prefer to have less suffering and an improved quality of life rather than treatment for every disease they have. ^{4 15} Lastly, the findings of this study need to be reproduced in a larger sample of practices, with follow up of patients, so that the outcome of clinical care can be assessed.

Future research
Interventions designed to improve the care of elderly patients in institutions should reflect and assess the different ways in which general practitioners, specialists, and nurses deliver this care.¹ Examples include educational interventions for the prescribing of neuroleptic drugs and the continuous assessment review and evaluation (CARE) scheme, which focuses on incontinence, management of decubital ulcers, autonomy of the patient, and drug use.¹⁶ Lastly, assessment of quality of care should consider the preferences of patients and their carers for drug treatments in terms of both potential benefits¹⁵ and potential harm. ^{14 16}

	Acknowledgments

We particularly thank the participating general practitioners and nursing home staff. We also thank Ray Sheridan for help with data collection and Alastair Hay, Chris Salisbury, Frank Sullivan, Tim Peters, and Marjorie Weiss for helpful comments about the study.

Contributors: See bmj.com

	Footnotes

Funding: This study was funded through an extended registrar contract for JB and through additional research funding from an NHS R&D primary care career scientist award for TF. The guarantor accepts full responsibility for the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish.

Competing interest: None declared.

Ethical approval: Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the local research ethics committee.

This is an abridged version; the full version is on bmj.com

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

1.	Black D, Bowman C. Community institutional care for frail elderly people. BMJ 1997; 315: 441-442[Free Full Text].
2.	Kavanagh S, Knapp M. The impact on general practitioners of the changing balance of care for elderly people living in institutions. BMJ 1998; 317: 322-327[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3.	Kavanagh S, Knapp M. Primary care arrangements for elderly people in residential and nursing homes. BMJ 1999; 318: 666[Free Full Text].
4.	Rochon P, Gurwitz JH. Prescribing for seniors. Neither too much nor too little. JAMA 1999; 282: 113-115[Free Full Text].
5.	McGrath A, Jackson G. Survey of neuroleptic prescribing in residents of nursing homes in Glasgow. BMJ 1996; 312: 611-612[Free Full Text].
6.	Roland M. Quality and efficiency: enemies or partners? Br J Gen Pract 1999; 49: 140-143[Medline].
7.	Marshall M, Campbell C, Hacker J, Roland M, eds. Quality indicators in general practice. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press, 2001.
8.	Gurwitz JH, Rochon P. Improving the quality of medication use in elderly patients. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 1670-1672[Free Full Text].
9.	Krumholz HM, Radford MJ, Wang Y, Chen J, Heiat A, Marciniak TA. National use and effectiveness of beta-blockers for the treatment of elderly patients after acute myocardial infarction: national cooperative cardiovascular project. JAMA 1998; 280: 623-629[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10.	Feder G, Griffiths C, Eldridge S, Spence M. Effect of postal prompts to patients and general practitioners on the quality of primary care after a coronary event (POST): randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1999; 318: 1522-1526[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11.	Campbell NC, Thain J, Deans HG, Ritchie LD, Rawles JM. Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease: baseline survey of provision in general practice. BMJ 1998; 316: 1430-1434[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12.	EUROASPIRE 1 and 11 Group. Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE 1 and 11 in nine countries. Lancet 2001; 357: 995-1001[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].
13.	Jolly K, Bradley F, Sharp S, Smith H, Thompson S, Kinmonth AL, et al. Randomised controlled trial of follow up care in general practice of patients with myocardial infarction and angina: final results of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP). BMJ 1999; 318: 706-711[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14.	Rochon PA, Gurwitz JH. Optimising drug treatment for elderly people: the prescribing cascade. BMJ 1997; 315: 1096-1099[Free Full Text].
15.	Redelmeier DA, Tan SH, Booth GL. The treatment of unrelated disorders in patients with chronic medical diseases. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1516-1520[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16.	Wagner C, van der Wal G, Groenewegen PP, de Bakker DH. The effectiveness of quality systems in nursing homes: a review. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2001; 10: 211-217[Abstract/Free Full Text].

(Accepted 21 January 2003)