Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Gordon C S Smith a Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rosie
Maternity Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, b Department of Public Health, Greater
Glasgow Health Board, Glasgow G3 8YU, c Information and Statistics Division,
Common Services Agency, Edinburgh EH5 3SE Correspondence to: G C S
Smith gcss2{at}cam.ac.uk
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective:
To determine whether twins born second are at increased risk of perinatal death because of complications during
labour and delivery.
Design:
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting:
Scotland, 1992 and 1997.
Participants:
All twin births at or after 24 weeks'
gestation, excluding twin pairs in which either twin died before labour
or delivery or died during or after labour and delivery because of congenital abnormality, non-immune hydrops, or twin to twin transfusion syndrome.
Main outcome measure:
Delivery related perinatal
deaths (deaths during labour or the neonatal period).
Results:
Overall, delivery related perinatal deaths were recorded for 23 first twins only and 23 second twins only of 1438 twin pairs born before 36 weeks (preterm) by means other than planned
caesarean section (P>0.99). No deaths of first twins and nine deaths
of second twins (P=0.004) were recorded among the 2436 twin pairs
born at or after 36 weeks (term). Discordance between first and second
twins differed significantly in preterm and term births (P=0.007).
Seven of nine deaths of second twins at term were due to anoxia during
the birth (2.9 (95% confidence interval 1.2 to 5.9) per 1000); five of
these deaths were associated with mechanical problems following vaginal
delivery of the first twin. No deaths were recorded among 454 second
twins delivered at term by planned caesarean section.
Conclusions:
Second twins born at term are at higher
risk than first twins of death due to complications of vaginal
delivery. Previous studies may not have shown an increased risk because of inadequate categorisation of deaths, lack of statistical power, inappropriate analyses, and pooling of data about preterm births and
term births.
|
What is already known on this topic
Deliveries of second twins are at increased risk of mechanical problems, such as cord prolapse and malpresentation, after vaginal delivery of first twins Increased risks of perinatal death in second twins have not been shown, but the methods of these studies were flawed What this study adds
Intrapartum anoxia caused 75% of these deaths in second twins, and most of these resulted from mechanical problems after vaginal delivery of first twins Planned caesarean section of twins at term may prevent perinatal deaths |
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Obstetricians recognise that second twins are vulnerable to
complications during labour and delivery.1 Analysis of
observational studies in the 1960s seemed to show that second twins
were at higher risk of perinatal death than first twins.2
These findings were subsequently refuted by a number of large scale
studies that failed to show a higher risk3-6 or that
showed only a very slightly higher risk.7 Previous large
scale studies have generally lacked detailed information on the cause
and timing of perinatal death. Consequently, differences in outcomes
related to complications during delivery of the second twin may have
been masked by other causes of death, such as prematurity, congenital
abnormality, and antepartum events. We conducted a large scale,
retrospective cohort study of delivery related perinatal deaths in twin
pregnancies by linking a national register of data on discharges after
childbirth to a national register of perinatal deaths.
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Population
We used the Scottish morbidity record to identify all births
between 1992 and 1997 and linked these records to records from the
Scottish Stillbirth and Infant Death Enquiry.
8 9
Definitions
Stillbirths were defined as babies born at or after 24 weeks'
gestation who showed no signs of life after delivery. Neonatal death
was defined as death during the first four weeks of life in a liveborn baby.
We defined delivery related perinatal death as intrapartum stillbirth or neonatal death not caused by congenital anomaly, hydrops, or twin to twin transfusion syndrome. The cause of death was subdivided into three paediatric categories: intrapartum anoxia, pulmonary causes, and all other paediatric causes. Deaths due to anoxia were further classified into those with a direct obstetric mechanical cause.
Socioeconomic deprivation, smoking, parity, maternal age, and
gestational age were defined as described previously.10
Term was defined as
36 weeks' gestation for twin
pregnancies.6
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Between 1992 and 1997, 4545 women delivered twins in Scotland at or after 24 weeks' gestation: 671 (14.8%) were delivered by planned caesarean section and 3874 (85.2%) by other means. On univariate analysis, age, socioeconomic status, height, and parity varied according to gestational age at the time of delivery among women delivered by a means other than planned caesarean section but only parity and maternal height were independent predictors of preterm birth.
The numbers of deaths of first and second twins born before 36 weeks' gestation did not differ significantly (table 1). Among births at or after 36 weeks' gestation, no deaths were recorded among first twins and nine deaths among second twins (3.7 (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 7.0) per 1000 deliveries; P=0.004 for excess of deaths of second twins). Discordance between first and second twins was significantly different in preterm and term births (table 1).
|
Of the nine deaths of second twins at term, five were intrapartum stillbirths and four were neonatal deaths. Seven of the nine deaths were attributed to intrapartum anoxia (2.9 (1.2 to 5.9) per 1000 deliveries). The cause of death was classified as mechanical in five of the seven anoxic deaths at term; this equated to 2.1 (0.7 to 4.8) per 1000 deliveries. Both twins were delivered vaginally in six out of the seven deliveries at term in which the second twin died from anoxia and in all five of the deliveries at term in which anoxia had an obstetric mechanical cause.
No differences in any maternal characteristics for twins delivered at term by a means other than planned caesarean section were seen according to whether the second twin died (table 2). When twins' characteristics were compared, no difference was seen in the proportion that were discordant for sex, but the percentage discrepancy in birth weight was significantly higher for pairs of twins in which the second twin died than for pairs in which both twins survived. When the actual weights for the nine pregnancies in which the second twin died during delivery at term were analysed, four of the second twins were larger than the first twins and five were smaller; the median birth weight did not differ between the first and second twins.
|
Multivariate conditional logistic regression confirmed that the
interaction between birth order and gestational age was independent of
maternal age, parity, smoking, height, and socioeconomic deprivation. When outcomes for the 454 twin pairs delivered at term by planned caesarean section were analysed, no delivery related perinatal deaths
of either first or second twins were seen.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We observed an excess of delivery related perinatal deaths of second twins born at term compared with their cotwins. The absolute risk of perinatal death for second twins born at term was approximately 1 in 270 for all causes, 1 in 350 for death due to intrapartum anoxia, and 1 in 500 for anoxic death due to a mechanical cause. These absolute risks are high in comparison with similar data for singleton term births in Scotland over the same period: delivery related perinatal death occurred in about 1 in 1000 births among nulliparous women and 1 in 2000 births among multiparous women; death due to a mechanical obstetric cause occurred in only 1 in 20 000 births.11
Methodological issues
Previous studies have compared the outcome of second twins born
vaginally either with vaginally delivered cotwins
2 3 5-7
or with second twins delivered by
caesarean section.
4 12-14
They failed to show a
significant association between birth order and the risk of delivery
related perinatal death. We were able to make both comparisons in our
study and also addressed several limitations in methods that were
apparent in previous studies.
Firstly, this study examined the outcomes of over 4500 twin pairs. Many previous studies that examined perinatal mortality in relation to birth order had fewer than 1000 twin pairs and many had fewer than 500 twin pairs.15 Given the relative rarity of delivery related perinatal death caused by intrapartum anoxia,11 such studies are clearly underpowered and would inevitably yield negative findings.
Secondly, to our knowledge, this study is the only large scale analysis to include data on both intrapartum stillbirths and neonatal deaths but to exclude antepartum deaths. Given that most delivery related perinatal deaths in second twins at term were intrapartum stillbirths, previous large scale studies that excluded stillbirths probably underestimated the risk to the second twin. 3-5 7 The only large scale study that included stillbirths was unable to distinguish between antepartum and intrapartum stillbirths.6
Thirdly, most studies have compared first and second twins across the whole range of gestational ages rather than stratified by gestational age. 3 5 7 The former method is legitimate only if the relative risk is homogeneous across the range of gestational ages. A statistical interaction between birth order and gestational age, however, is predictable. Eighty per cent of twins delivered at 24 weeks die compared with less than 1% at term.6 The principal determinant of the risk of death is prematurity, which clearly is the same for both twins. The potential for birth order to increase the baseline risk due to complications during labour and delivery, therefore, would be expected to increase with advancing gestational age. Our study confirmed a positive interaction between being a second twin and gestational age and thus confirms that the assumption of homogeneity implicit in previous analyses was invalid.
Finally, our statistical analysis took into account the paired nature
of the data. Many previous studies, including previous large scale
analyses,3-7 compared data on first and second twins by
using statistical techniques that assume independence of observations. The use of unpaired tests for paired data is inappropriate. If we had
used the same analytical approach as some previous studies (failed to
stratify by gestational age and used a statistical test for unpaired
data), we would have observed, overall, 67 deaths among all first twins
and 75 among second twins; this would have failed to reach significance
(
2 test, P=0.49).
The excess of deaths due to intrapartum anoxia was significant only for twins born at term. Although no significant difference was seen between the risks of death for first and second twins born preterm, the confidence intervals for the odds ratio of death of the preterm second twin (relative to the first twin) due to intrapartum anoxia were 0.3 to 3.5. Our data cannot exclude an excess risk of anoxic death for preterm second twins; further larger analyses are required.
Caesarean deliveries
Since the excess of deaths of second twins at term seems to be
attributable to labour, current data suggest that planned caesarean
delivery may be protective against perinatal death among twins.
Although there were no deaths of second twins following planned
caesarean delivery at term, the numbers were too small to confirm a
protective effect of planned caesarean section. Sample
size calculations show that it will be difficult to obtain randomised
controlled trial data to test the hypothesis that planned caesarean
section would be protective against perinatal death in twin
pregnancies. With a rate of three deaths of second twins due to
intrapartum anoxia per 1000 deliveries, allowing 80% power for a one
sided test, and assuming that the rate of perinatal death in the
planned caesarean group is zero, a randomised controlled trial would
need to recruit about 6500 women with twin pregnancies. We propose that
women with twins should be counselled about the risk to the second twin
and the theoretical possibility of a protective effect of planned
caesarean section when considering mode of delivery at term.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Ian White, a senior scientist at the Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, for helpful discussion regarding the statistical analysis and for reviewing the completed manuscript.
Contributors: See bmj.com
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: No external funding.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Simpson LI, D'Alton ME. Multiple pregnancy. In: Creasy RK, ed. Management of labor and delivery. Malden: Blackwell Science, 1997:395-413. |
| 2. | Wyshak G, White C. Birth hazard of the second twin. JAMA 1963; 186: 869-870. |
| 3. | McCarthy BJ, Sachs BP, Layde PM, Burton A, Terry JS, Rochat R. The epidemiology of neonatal death in twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 141: 252-256[Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 4. | Zhang J, Bowes WA, Grey TW, McMahon MJ. Twin delivery and neonatal and infant mortality: a population-based study. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 593-598[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 5. | Newman RB, Mauldin JG, Ebeling M. Risk factors for neonatal death in twin gestations in the state of South Carolina. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 757-762[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 6. | Hartley RS, Emanuel I, Hitti J. Perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity rates among twin pairs at different gestational ages: optimal delivery timing at 37 to 38 weeks' gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 451-458[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 7. | Imaizumi Y. Infant mortality rates in single, twin and triplet births, and influencing factors in Japan, 1995-98. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2001; 15: 346-351[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 8. | Cole SK. Scottish maternity and neonatal records. In: Chalmers I, McIlwaine GM, eds. Perinatal audit and surveillance. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 1980:39-51. |
| 9. | McIlwaine GM, Dunn FH, Howat RC, Smalls M, Wyllie MM, MacNaughton MC. A routine system for monitoring perinatal deaths in Scotland. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92: 9-13[Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 10. |
Smith GCS, Pell JP.
Teenage pregnancy and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes associated with first and second births: population based retrospective cohort study.
BMJ
2001;
323:
476-479 |
| 11. |
Smith GCS, Pell JP, Cameron AD, Dobbie R.
Risk of perinatal death associated with delivery after previous caesarean section.
JAMA
2002;
287:
2684-2690 |
| 12. | Adam C, Allen AC, Baskett TF. Twin delivery: influence of the presentation and method of delivery on the second twin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 23-27[Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 13. | Greig PC, Veille JC, Morgan T, Henderson L. The effect of presentation and mode of delivery on neonatal outcome in the second twin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 901-906[Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 14. | Ziadeh SM, Badria LF. Effect of mode of delivery on neonatal outcome of twins with birthweight under 1500 g. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2000; 264: 128-130[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 15. | Boggess KA, Chisholm CA. Delivery of the nonvertex second twin: a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1997; 52: 728-735[CrossRef][Medline]. |
(Accepted 6 June 2002)
Read all Rapid Responses