Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Francine M Ducharme Departments of Paediatrics
and of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University Health Centre,
Montreal, QC H3H 1P3, Canada Francine.ducharme{at}muhc.mcgill.ca
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objectives:
To examine the evidence for the efficacy
and glucocorticoid sparing effect of oral anti-leukotrienes taken daily
as add-on therapy to inhaled glucocorticoids in patients with asthma.
Design:
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of children and adults with asthma comparing the addition of
anti-leukotrienes or placebo to inhaled glucocorticoids.
Main outcome measures:
The rate of exacerbations of
asthma requiring rescue systemic glucocorticoids when the intervention
was compared to the same or double dose of inhaled glucocorticoids, and
the glucocorticoid sparing effect when the intervention was aimed at
tapering the glucocorticoid.
Results:
Of 376 citations, 13 were included: 12 in adult patients and one in children. The addition of licensed doses of
anti-leukotrienes to inhaled glucocorticoids resulted in a non-significant reduction in the risk of exacerbations requiring systemic steroids (two trials; relative risk 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 1.05). No trials comparing the use of
anti-leukotrienes with double the dose of inhaled glucocorticoids could
be pooled. The use of anti-leukotrienes resulted in no overall group
difference in the lowest achieved dose of inhaled glucocorticoids
(three trials; weighted mean difference -44.43 µg/day, -147.87 to
59.02: random effect model) but was associated with a reduction in
withdrawals owing to poor asthma control (four trials; relative risk
0.56, 0.35 to 0.89).
Conclusions:
The addition of anti-leukotrienes to
inhaled glucocorticoids may modestly improve asthma control compared
with inhaled glucocorticoids alone but this strategy cannot be
recommended as a substitute for increasing the dose of inhaled
glucocorticoids. The addition of anti-leukotrienes is possibly
associated with superior asthma control after tapering of
glucocorticoids, but the glucocorticoid sparing effect cannot be
quantified at present.
|
What is already known on this topic
No systematic review of randomised controlled trials has examined the evidence to support this treatment strategy What this study adds
|
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inhaled glucocorticoids are the cornerstone of asthma management.1 When the control of asthma is poor, other drugs such as long acting ß2 agonists and anti-leukotrienes can be added.2-4 Anti-leukotrienes are a new class of anti-inflammatory drugs.5 Thus the combination of anti-leukotrienes and inhaled glucocorticoids may enhance the control of asthma by reducing bronchoconstriction and inflammation of the airways.
We examined the safety and efficacy of oral anti-leukotrienes as add-on
therapy to inhaled glucocorticoids in children and adults with asthma
to quantify the improvement in asthma control achieved over inhaled
steroids alone (at the same or double the dose) and the glucocorticoid
sparing effect when inhaled steroids are tapered.
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Identification of trials
We searched Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and Central (Cochrane
controlled trials register) databases up to August 2001; for the
detailed search strategy see bmj.com. We checked the references of all identified trials and review articles, and we searched the
abstract books of the international meeting of the American Thoracic
Society for 1998, 1999, and 2000. We contacted the international headquarters of pharmaceutical companies producing anti-leukotrienes to
obtain or to identify unpublished trials.
Study selection
We included trials if they met the following criteria: they were
randomised controlled trials, they pertained to children and adults
with asthma who were taking inhaled glucocorticoids for maintenance,
they compared the addition of anti-leukotrienes or placebo daily to
inhaled glucocorticoids for a minimum of 28 days. The primary outcome
measures were the number of exacerbations of asthma requiring rescue
systemic glucocorticoids when the intervention was compared with the
same or an increased dose of inhaled glucocorticoids and the change
from the baseline dose of inhaled glucocorticoids required to maintain
control when the intervention was aimed to establish the steroid
sparing effect. Secondary outcomes were changes in pulmonary function
tests, symptoms, use of rescue ß2 agonists, quality of
life, exacerbations requiring hospital admission, adverse effects, and
withdrawals. The quality of the methods of each trial was assessed
with the Jadad's instrument.6
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Of the 376 identified citations, we included 13 trials (six
unpublished) in the review (table 1). The quality of methods of 10 trials was rated high (
4) and was confirmed by authors in all cases;
in the remaining three trials allocation was not concealed.
10 12 15
|
Anti-leukotrienes versus placebo as add-on therapy to inhaled
glucocorticoids
Although four
7-9 11
of the six
10 12
identified trials contributed data to the primary outcome, only two
tested anti-leukotrienes (montelukast; Singulair, Merck Frosst) at
licensed doses.
7 8
With the addition of licensed doses of
anti-leukotrienes to glucocorticoids, a non-significant reduction in
the risk of exacerbations requiring systemic steroids was observed
(relative risk 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 1.05). The only
paediatric trial did not show any significant group difference. When
higher doses were examined, the addition of pranlukast (Ono, Japan) or zafirlukast (Accolate, Astra Zeneca) reduced the risk of exacerbations requiring systemic steroids by 66% (relative risk 0.34, 0.13 to 0.88)
(fig 1). The number needed to treat was 20 (11 to 100).
Pooling of the two trials testing the use of licensed doses of montelukast for four or 16 weeks showed significant but modest group differences in favour of anti-leukotrienes in the change from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow rate (weighted mean difference 7.71 l/min, 2.98 to 12.44), use of ß2 agonists (-0.32 puffs/day, -0.56 to -0.08), and eosinophil counts (-0.07 × 109/l, -0.14 to 0.00). 7 8 No significant group difference was observed in the change in forced expiratory volume in one second (0.07 litres, -0.01 to 0.16) or in the risk of overall withdrawals (relative risk 0.91, 0.54 to 1.53), withdrawals owing to adverse effects (0.65, 0.26 to 1.66), increased concentrations of liver enzymes (1.02, 0.36 to 2.88), headache (1.16, 0.86 to 1.57), and nausea (0.45, 0.19 to 1.07).
Pooling of the two trials of higher than licensed doses of pranlukast
or zafirlukast for six weeks showed a significant group difference
favouring the addition of anti-leukotrienes to inhaled corticosteroids.
This was shown in the magnitude of improvement from baseline in forced
expiratory volume in one second (weighted mean difference 0.10 litres;
0.01 to 0.20), peak expiratory flow (27.2 l/min, 18.6 to 35.8), use of
rescue
2 agonists (-0.43, -0.22 to -0.63), and asthma
symptoms (standardised mean difference -0.46, -0.25 to
-0.66).
9 11
No group difference in overall adverse
events or nausea was observed; insufficient number of trials prevented
pooling of data for other adverse effects.
Anti-leukotrienes as add-on therapy to inhaled glucocorticoids
versus double dose inhaled glucocorticoids
The data from two unpublished trials, each testing two different
doses of zafirlukast, were analysed.
13 14
Pooling of data
was only possible for zafirlukast at four times the licensed dose. No
apparent group difference was found in the risk of an exacerbation
requiring systemic steroids after 12 weeks of treatment with
zafirlukast 80 mg twice daily (relative risk 1.08, 0.47 to 2.50).
No group difference was found in secondary outcomes. Zafirlukast (80 mg
twice daily) was associated with an increased risk of increased
concentrations of liver enzymes (1 in every 25 patients, 95%
confidence interval 14 to 100) and 1 in every 33 (16 to
) patients
would withdraw due to adverse events. In contrast, a double dose of
beclomethasone was associated with a higher risk of oral moniliasis
compared with anti-leukotrienes (number needed to harm 33, 17 to
100).
|
Anti-leukotrienes versus placebo as add-on therapy to tapered
doses of inhaled glucocorticoids
After 12 weeks of treatment, two trials of zafirlukast reported no
significant group difference in final mean symptom scores and use of
ß2 agonists.
16 17
Trends approaching significance favouring the intervention were observed in the final forced expiratory volume in one second (weighted mean difference 0.12 litres,-0.02 to 0.27) and final peak expiratory flow (14.47 l/min,
-4.54 to 33.48). Two trials testing montelukast failed to report
sufficient data to confirm comparable asthma control after steroid
tapering.
18 19
Pooling of the four trials showed a
noticeable reduction (relative risk 0.56, 0.35 to 0.89) in the rate of
withdrawal owing to poor asthma control in the group treated with
anti-leukotrienes, suggesting better asthma control with the
combination therapy.
After 12 to 20 weeks of treatment, no overall group difference was observed in change from the baseline dose of inhaled glucocorticoid required to maintain asthma control (three trials; weighted mean difference 1.87%, -3.52% to 7.27%). When the lowest tolerated dose of inhaled glucocorticoids was considered, no meaningful group difference was observed either (-44 µg/day, -148 to 59) (fig 2). Based on the relative potency and distribution of inhaled steroids used in the montelukast trial (table 1), the 200 µg/day would translate to an approximate corticosteroid sparing effect of 160 µg/day of beclomethasone equivalent.3 The rate of complete glucocorticoid weaning was similar between groups (three trials, relative risk 1.18, 0.95 to 1.47).
|
No group difference was found in the number of overall withdrawals, withdrawals owing to adverse effects (relative risk 1.07, 0.57 to 2.03), increased concentrations of liver enzymes (2.13, 0.80 to 5.68), headache (0.90, 0.64 to 1.26), or nausea (1.14, 0.49 to 2.67). The similarity between groups in the number of overall adverse effects met our definition of equivalence (0.98, 0.91 to 1.05). A significantly increased risk of serious adverse events as defined by the criteria of the Federal Drug Administration was associated with zafirlukast at licensed doses (2.47, 1.53 to 3.97). 16 17 20
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Strengths and limitations of the review
This meta-analysis is limited by the quantity and quality of
existing data. Despite the abundance of literature on
anti-leukotrienes, only 8% of randomised controlled trials were
designed to assess the role of anti-leukotrienes as add-on therapy to
inhaled glucocorticoids; most of the excluded trials compared
anti-leukotrienes with placebo in groups of patients comprised of, or
including, those naïve to steroids. Publication bias was evident: of
the five trials involved in the glucocorticoid tapering protocol, only
the one in favour of anti-leukotrienes is published.6 A
thorough systematic search resulted in the identification of
unpublished trials of high quality methods, increasing the power and
scope of the review.21 The value of this review is
strengthened by the direct confirmation of methods and extracted data
from the authors or sponsors of nine of the 13 trials and the voluntary
disclosure of data for five unpublished trials.
13 14 16 17 19
Because the number and size of
studies pooled under each protocol were small, the robustness of
analyses of different inhaled glucocorticoids and anti-leukotrienes,
doses, age, duration of intervention, and lung function could not be assessed. Clearly, these preliminary conclusions may be modified with
accumulating data from future well designed, parallel group, long term
(>20 weeks) randomised controlled trials; a prolonged (>16 weeks)
dose optimisation period before randomisation and intention to treat
analysis are key design features to clarify the glucocorticoid sparing
effect of anti-leukotrienes. Updates of this review will be available
in the Cochrane Library.
Adverse effects
Montelukast at licensed doses was not associated with increased
adverse effects. The 2.5-fold increased risk of serious adverse events,
noted only in the tapering protocol in association with licensed doses
of zafirlukast, raises concerns. Although the definition of serious
events included those resulting in major disability, admission to
hospital or prolongation of hospital stay, life threatening reaction,
or death, the observed events were often linked with increased
concentrations of liver enzymes prompting withdrawals (C Miller,
personal communication, 2000). The fivefold increased risk of liver
enzyme concentrations being increased and threefold increased risk of
withdrawals owing to adverse events noted with higher than licensed
doses of zafirlukast plead against using these drugs beyond the
recommended doses. Other than the expected increased risk of oral
moniliasis with double doses of inhaled steroids, no trials have
examined important adverse effects associated with the prolonged use of
inhaled glucocorticoids, such as osteopenia, adrenal suppression, and
growth suppression in children; such documentation would have permitted
a fairer comparison between the safety profile of the two treatments.
Conclusions
The addition of licensed doses of anti-leukotrienes to inhaled
glucocorticoids may modestly improve the control of asthma. There is
little evidence to consider their use as a substitute to increasing the
dose of inhaled glucocorticoids. In well controlled patients, the
addition of anti-leukotrienes is possibly associated with superior
asthma control after glucocorticoid tapering, but there is insufficient
evidence to quantify the corticosteroid sparing effect. Extrapolation
of data to children remains speculative. Until further evidence is
available, the gold standard of asthma treatment should remain the use
of inhaled glucocorticoids at the lowest effective dose.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Giselle Hicks and Ritz Kakuma for helping in the identification of eligible trials, assessment of methods and data extraction, and data entry, Christopher Miller and Susan Shaffer (Astra-Zeneca, USA) and Theodore F Reiss and G P Noonan (Merck Frosst, USA) for confirmation of methods and data extraction and providing data whenever possible, Toby Lasserson and Karen Blackhall (Cochrane Airways Review Group) for the literature search and ongoing support, Christopher Cates and Paul Jones for their constructive comments, and Keiji Hayashi for translating the Japanese articles.
Contributors: See bmj.com
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: FMD was supported by a salary award of the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec. Ritz Kakuma was supported by the Canadian Cochrane Network.
Competing interests: FMD has received travel support, research funds, and fees for speaking from both Zeneca Pharma, producer of zafirlukast, and from Merck Frosst, producer of montelukast. She has received some travel support for attending meetings, a research grant, and consulting fee from Glaxo Wellcome, producer of some inhaled corticosteroids preparations to which anti-leukotriene agents have been compared.
The full version of this paper
appears on bmj.com
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Spahn JD, Leung DYM. The role of glucocorticoids in the management of asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc 1996; 17: 341-350[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 2. |
The British guidelines on asthma management.
Thorax
1997;
52:
1-21S |
| 3. | Murphy S, Sheffer AL, Pauwels R. National asthma education and prevention program. Expert panel report 2: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Institutes of Health publication 97-4051. Bethesda, MD: National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, 1997. |
| 4. | Boulet LP, Becker A, Berube D, Beveridge R, Ernst P. Canadian asthma consensus report, 1999. Can Med Assoc J 1999; 161: 1-72S. |
| 5. | Piper PJ. Leukotrienes and the airways. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1989; 6: 241-255[Medline]. |
| 6. | Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1995; 134: 1-12. |
| 7. |
Laviolette M, Malmstrom K, Lu S, Chervinsky P, Pujet JC, Peszek I, et al.
Montelukast added to inhaled beclomethasone in treatment of asthma.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1999;
160:
1862-1868 |
| 8. | Simons FER, Villa JR, Lee BW, Teper AM, Lyttle B, Aristizabal G, et al. Montelukast added to budesonide in children with persistent asthma: a randomised, double-blind, crossover study. J Pediatr 2001; 138: 694-698[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 9. | Tamaoki J, Kondo M, Sakai N, Nakata J, Takemura H, Nagai A, et al. Leukotriene antagonist prevents exacerbation of asthma during reduction of high-dose inhaled corticosteroid. The Tokyo Joshi-Idai Asthma Research Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 155: 1235-1240[Abstract]. |
| 10. | Tomita T, Hashimoto K, Matsumoto S, Nakamoto T, Tokuyasu H, Yamasaki A, et al. Pranlukast allows reduction of inhaled steroid dose without deterioration in lung function in adult asthmatics. Arerugi 1999; 48: 459-465[Medline]. |
| 11. |
Virchow JC, Hassall SM, Summerton L, Harris A.
Zafirlukast improves asthma control in patients receiving high-dose inhaled corticosteroids.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1997;
156:
578-585 |
| 12. | Wada K, Minoguchi K, Kohno Y, Oda N, Matsuura T, Kawazu K, et al. Effect of a leukotriene receptor antagonist, pranlukast hydrate, on airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with moderate to severe asthma. Allergol Int 2000; 49: 63-68[CrossRef]. |
| 13. | Nayak AS, Anderson P, Charous BL, Williams K, Simonson S. Equivalence of adding zafirlukast versus double-dose inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic patients symptomatic on low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998; 101(1 of part 2): S233. [Abstract 965.] |
| 14. | Ringdal N, White M, Harris A. Addition of zafirlukast (Accolate) compared with a double-dose of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with reversible airways obstruction symptomatic on inhaled corticosteroids. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 159(3 of part 2): 639. [Abstract.] |
| 15. | Baba K, Hattori T, Sakakibara A, Kobayashi T, Takagi K. The usefulness of pranlukast or seratrodast for step-down of inhaled corticosteroid therapy in adult chronic asthma. Am Rev Resp Crit Care Med 1999; 159: A626. |
| 16. | Bateman ED, Holgate ST, Binks SM, Tarna IP. A multicentre study to assess the steroid-sparing potential of Accolate. Allergy 1995; 50(suppl 26): 320. [Abstract P-0709.] |
| 17. | Laitinen LA, Zetterstrom O, Holgate ST, Binks S, Whitney JG. Effects of Accolate in permitting reduced therapy with inhaled steroids: a multicenter trial in patients with doses of inhaled steroids optimised between 800 and 2000 mcg per day. Allergy 1995; 50(suppl 26): 320. [Abstract P-0710.] |
| 18. |
Lofdahl CG, Reiss TF, Leff JA, Israel E, Noonan MJ, Finn AF, et al.
Randomised, placebo controlled trial of effect of a leukotriene receptor antagonist, montelukast, on tapering inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic patients.
BMJ
1999;
319:
87-90 |
| 19. | Shingo S, Zhang J, Noonan N, Reiss TF, Leff JA. A standardized composite clinical score allows safe tapering of inhaled corticosteroids in an asthma clinical trial. [Theodore Reiss, personal communication, 2001.] |
| 20. | Anon. Code of Federal Regulations. US Government Printing Office via GPO Access. Title 21,volume 5; section 312.32 IND safety reports 2001, 69-71. www.fda.gov/cder/regulatory (accessed Aug 2001.) |
| 21. | Thornton A, Lee P. Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 207-216[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. |
(Accepted 13 December 2001)
Read all Rapid Responses