Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Rosalind M Green a North West Lung Centre,
Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester M23 9LT, b Department of
Respiratory Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of
Medicine, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London
W2 1PG, c University Medicine, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton
SO9 6YD Correspondence to: A Custovic
acustovic{at}fs1.with.man.ac.uk
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective:
To investigate the importance of
sensitisation and exposure to allergens and viral infection in
precipitating acute asthma in adults resulting in admission to hospital.
Design:
Case-control study.
Setting:
Large district general hospital.
Participants:
60 patients aged 17-50 admitted to
hospital over a year with acute asthma, matched with two controls:
patients with stable asthma recruited from the outpatient department
and patients admitted to hospital with non-respiratory conditions (inpatient controls).
Main outcome measures:
Atopic status (skin testing
and total and specific IgE), presence of common respiratory viruses and
atypical bacteria (polymerase chain reaction), dust samples from homes, and exposure to allergens (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): Der p 1, Fel d 1, Can f 1, and Bla g 2).
Results:
Viruses were detected in 31 of 177 patients. The difference in the frequency of viruses detected between the groups
was significant (admitted with asthma 26%, stable asthma 18%,
inpatient controls 9%; P=0.04). A significantly higher proportion of
patients admitted with asthma (66%) were sensitised and exposed to
either mite, cat, or dog allergen than patients with stable asthma
(37%) and inpatient controls (15%; P<0.001). Being sensitised and
exposed to allergens was an independent associate of the group admitted
to hospital (odds ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 5.4;
P=0.05), whereas the combination of sensitisation, high exposure to
one or more allergens, and viral detection considerably increased the
risk of being admitted with asthma (8.4, 2.1 to 32.8;
P=0.002).
Conclusions:
Allergens and viruses may act together
to exacerbate asthma.
|
What is already known on this topic
No studies have investigated an interaction between sensitisation, exposure to allergens, and virus infections in real life exacerbations of asthma What this study adds
Strategies to reduce the impact of asthma exacerbations in adults should include interventions directed at both viruses and reducing exposure to allergens |
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Asthma costs 1-2% of the total health budgets in direct costs, with equally large indirect costs for time lost from work and reduced productivity. 1 2 Much of these costs come from hospital admissions. Being admitted to hospital with asthma is also an important risk factor for death from the condition.3
Of 450 000 adults admitted yearly with asthma to emergency
departments in the United States, an estimated 200 000 were sensitised to mite, cat, or cockroach allergen.4 Viral respiratory
infections have been associated with most acute exacerbations of wheeze
in childhood.5 In the early part of each school term there
is an increase in hospital admissions for asthma associated with the
acquisition of new viruses.6 An interaction has been
suggested between sensitisation and virus infection in exacerbating
asthma in children.7 Few studies have been conducted in
adults, although there is evidence that viral infections are associated
with many exacerbations of asthma.8 In experimental
studies synergistic effects have been shown between allergens and
viruses.
9 10
No studies have investigated an interaction
between sensitisation, exposure to allergens, and viral infections in
real life exacerbations of asthma. We therefore determined their
relative importance in precipitating acute asthma in adults resulting
in admission to hospital.
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We matched 60 patients (aged 17-50) admitted to hospital over a year with acute asthma for sex, age, and smoking status with two controls: patients with stable asthma recruited from the outpatient department and patients admitted to hospital with non-respiratory conditions (inpatient controls). We enrolled controls within two weeks of the index case being recruited.
We assessed the participants' atopic status by skin prick testing (house dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus), cat, dog, cockroach, mixed grasses, trees, Trichophyton, Alternaria, Aspergillus, and negative and positive controls) and measurement of total and specific serum IgE levels. We performed nasal lavage for virology, and we made a home visit within three weeks of recruitment to determine exposure to allergens (environmental questionnaire and collection of dust samples). We collected dust samples and determined the allergens from the participants' mattresses, bedding, bedroom floors, living room floors, upholstered furniture, and kitchens.11-14
Statistical analysis
We compared the outcome measures across the groups initially by
using
2 test, one way analysis of variance, and
Student's t test. Major exposure occurs with Der p 1
2
µg/g, Fel d 1
8 µg/g, and Can f 1
10
µg/g.
15 16
From these values we divided the population into those exposed or not exposed to high levels of allergens. We
carried out a further analysis of the risk factors for admission with
asthma in the acute and stable asthma groups with logistic regression.
Initially we assessed risk factors by univariate analysis. We then
tested variables in a multivariate analysis, combining the relevant
variables to control for the effect of each explanatory variable on the
other variables studied.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We recruited 178 patients: 61 admitted with asthma, 58 with stable asthma, and 59 inpatient controls. We matched 57 of the patients admitted with asthma with two controls. One patient admitted with asthma had a control with stable asthma only, two an inpatient control only, and one no suitable controls. Table 1 lists the participants' personal and housing details.
|
|
Sensitisation to inhalant allergens
Significant differences were observed between the three groups in
the frequency of positive skin tests for dust mite, cat, dog, and grass
allergens but not for other allergens (table 2). No differences were
found between patients admitted with asthma and those with stable
asthma, and the observed difference between the groups was due to the
lower proportion of inpatients being sensitised. Similarly, total and
specific IgE levels to mite, cat, and dog allergens were significantly
higher in both groups of patients with asthma than in patients admitted
with non-respiratory conditions (admitted v inpatient
controls: total IgE, mean difference 4.3-fold, 95% confidence interval
2.4 to 7.6, P<0.001; specific IgE to mite, 2.5, 1.2 to 5.0, P=0.01;
specific IgE to cat, 4.2, 2.1 to 8.3, P<0.001; specific IgE to dog,
2.9, 1.6 to 5.2, P=0.001). Although total serum IgE levels were
higher in patients admitted with asthma than in those with stable
asthma (53%, 29% to 96%, P=0.04), there were no significant
differences between specific IgE levels.
Detection of viruses
Viruses were detected in 31 of 177 patients (17%): picornaviruses
in 10 and coronavirus in 21. No other viruses or atypical bacteria were
detected. A significant difference was found in the frequency of viral
detection between the three groups (admitted with asthma 26.2%, stable
asthma 17.5%, inpatient controls 8.5%; P=0.038) (table 2).
Exposure to allergens
Patients admitted with asthma had significantly higher levels of
Der p 1 in their mattress and bedding, Fel d 1 levels in mattress, and
Can f 1 in bedroom floor and mattress than patients with stable asthma.
Patients admitted with asthma also had significantly higher levels
of Der p 1 in both mattress and bedding than inpatient controls. No
differences were observed between patients with stable asthma and
inpatient controls. Bla g 2 levels were low and not different
between groups.
Combinations of sensitisation, exposure to allergens, and viral
detection
A significantly higher proportion of patients admitted with asthma
(66%) were sensitised and exposed to either mite, cat, or dog
allergens than patients with stable asthma (37%) and inpatient
controls (15.1%; P<0.001). A highly significant difference was
observed between the groups for the combination of sensitisation and
exposure to high levels of sensitising allergen and viral detection.
Risk factors for admission with asthma
We carried out further analysis of the risk factors for admission
in patients with acute and stable asthma by using logistic regression.
Sensitisation to each or any of the allergens by itself was not
significantly associated with hospital admission (table 3). However,
being both sensitised and exposed to high levels of dust mite allergen
was significantly associated with hospital admission, and strong trends
were observed for both sensitisation and exposure to high levels of cat
and dog allergens. Sensitisation and exposure to any one or more
allergens was significantly associated with hospital admission (odds
ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval 1.4 to 7.1). Detection of viruses alone was not significantly associated with admission for asthma (table
3). However, of 16 patients admitted with asthma with detectable
viruses, 14 were also sensitised and exposed to high levels of
allergen, compared with only 3 of 10 with stable asthma. The
combination of sensitisation and high exposure to one or more allergens
and detection of viruses was a strong and significant associate of
admission for asthma.
|
When sensitisation, exposure to allergens, and detection of viruses were controlled for, being both sensitised and exposed to allergens was an independent associate of admission with asthma (2.3, 1.0 to 5.4). However, the combination of sensitisation and high exposure to one or more allergens and detection of viruses increased the risk of admission with asthma (8.4, 2.1 to 32.8).
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Exposure to allergens has been related to disease severity.17-19 Patients with severe asthma were significantly more often sensitised and exposed to high levels of allergens to which they were allergic than patients with mild disease.18 Thus for symptoms to occur there must be both sensitisation and exposure.
Viral infection
Viral infection was noticeably less common in adults admitted to
hospital with acute asthma than in children or adults having asthma
exacerbations in the community.
5 8
However, viral
infection represents a significant risk factor in those patients who
are also both sensitised and exposed to allergens. Our data suggest
that patients with asthma are more susceptible to viral infections than
patients without asthma but that such an infection may not necessarily
induce deterioration in asthma requiring hospital admission. Only 16 of
our patients with acute asthma had a positive polymerase chain reaction
results for a respiratory virus. This is in contrast to several
previous studies in children from our group, which have shown a strong relation between virus infection and exacerbations of
asthma.5 Twenty two of the our patients who were admitted
reported symptoms which they attributed to a cold before admission, but
they had negative polymerase chain reaction result for virus. These
symptoms may have been due to an allergic response that was mistaken
for infection. They could also be true viral infections that were not detected.
Respiratory virus infection and allergic inflammation
Several experimental studies have shown a synergistic interaction
between respiratory virus infection and allergic inflammation.
Histamine responsiveness and epithelial eosinophils increased during
the viral infection but only persisted into the convalescent period in
the patients with asthma.20 Grunberg et al challenged
patients with atopic asthma with rhinovirus or placebo.21
In the group inoculated with rhinovirus there was no significant change
in lung function but there was an increase in bronchial
hyper-reactivity and interleukin 8, which correlated with the severity
of the cold. In a study of patients with allergic rhinitis who were
sensitised to ragweed, after infection with rhinovirus 16 the
patients developed nearly a threefold increased non-specific and
specific airway responsiveness during the acute viral infection, with
an increased probability of a late asthmatic reaction with ragweed
challenge for up to four weeks after the infection.22
Conclusions
Allergens and viruses may act together to exacerbate asthma,
indicating that domestic exposure to allergens acts synergistically
with viruses in sensitised patients, increasing the risk of hospital
admission. In the absence of the effective strategies to control
viruses, attention should be paid to reducing exposure to allergens.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Martin Chapman, Martin Brutsche, Helen Marolia, Jill Fletcher, Mandy Mycock, Mark Craven, and Greg Cain for their help, and Julie Morris and Stephen Francis for statistical advice.
Contributors: see bmj.com
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: RMG was funded by a scholarship award from the UCB Institute of Allergy, award number 95320. AC is the recipient of the National Asthma Campaign senior clinical research fellowship.
Competing interests: None declared.
The full version of this article
appears on bmj.com
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | National Asthma Audit 1999/2000. London: National Asthma Campaign, 1999:12-16. |
| 2. |
Smith DH, Malone DC, Lawson KA, Okamoto LJ, Battista C, Saunders WB.
A national estimate of the economic cost of asthma.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1997;
156:
787-793 |
| 3. |
Campbell MJ, Holgate ST, Johnston SL.
Trends in asthma mortality.
BMJ
1997;
315:
1012 |
| 4. |
Gelber LE, Seltzer LH, Bouzoukis JK, Pollart SM, Chapman MD, Platts-Mills TA.
Sensitization and exposure to indoor allergens as risk factors for asthma among patients presenting to hospital.
Am Rev Resp Dis
1993;
147:
573-578 |
| 5. |
Johnston SL, Pattemore PK, Sanderson G, Smith S, Lampe F, Josephs L, et al.
Community study of role of viral infections in exacerbations of asthma in 9-11 year old children.
BMJ
1995;
310:
1225-1228 |
| 6. |
Johnston SL, Pattemore PK, Sanderson G, Smith S, Campbell MJ, Josephs LK, et al.
The relationship between upper respiratory infections and hospital admission for asthma: a time trend analysis.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1996;
154:
654-660 |
| 7. |
Duff AL, Pomeranz ES, Gelber LE, Price GW, Farris H, Hayden FG, et al.
Risk factors for acute wheezing in infants and children: viruses, passive smoke and IgE antibodies to inhalant allergens.
Paediatrics
1993;
92:
535-540 |
| 8. |
Nicholson KG, Kent J, Ireland DC.
Respiratory viruses and exacerbations of asthma in adults.
BMJ
1993;
307:
982-986 |
| 9. |
Calhoun WJ, Dick EC, Schwartz LB, Busse WW.
A common cold virus, rhinovirus 16, potentiates airway inflammation after segmental antigen bronchoprovocation in allergic subjects.
J Clin Invest
1994;
94:
2200-2208 |
| 10. |
Busse WW, Gern JE.
Viruses in asthma.
J Allergy Clin Immunol
1997;
100:
147-150 |
| 11. |
Luczynska CM, Arruda LK, Platts-Mills TAE, Miller JD, Lopez M, Chapman MD.
A two site monoclonal antibody ELISA for the quantification of the major Dermatophagoides spp. allergens, Der p I and Der f I.
J Immunol Methods
1989;
118:
227-235 |
| 12. |
Chapman MD, Aalberse RC, Brown MJ, Platts-Mills TAE.
Monoclonal antibodies to the major feline allergen Fel d I. II: Single step affinity purification of Fel d I, N terminal sequence analysis and development of a sensitive two site immunoassay to assess Fel d I exposure.
J Immunol
1988;
140:
812-818 |
| 13. |
Custovic A, Green R, Fletcher A, Smith A, Pickering CAC, Chapman MD, et al.
Aerodynamic properties of the major dog allergen, Can f 1: distribution in homes, concentration and particle size of allergen in the air.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1997;
155:
94-98 |
| 14. |
Pollart SM, Mullins DE, Vailes LD, Sutherland WM, Chapman MD.
Identification, quantitation and purification of cockroach allergens using monoclonal antibodies.
J Allergy Clin Immunol
1991;
87:
511-521 |
| 15. |
Platts Mills TAE, Vervloet D, Thomas WR, Aalberse RC, Chapman MD.
Indoor allergens and asthma: report of the third international workshop.
J Allergy Clin Immunol
1997;
100(6):
1-21S |
| 16. |
Ingram JM, Sporik R, Rose G, Honsinger R, Chapman MD, Platts-Mills TAE.
Quantitative assessment of exposure to dog (Can f 1) and cat (Fel d 1) allergens: relation to sensitization and asthma among children living in Los Alamos, New Mexico.
J Allergy Clin Immunol
1995;
96:
449-456 |
| 17. |
Rosenstreich DL, Eggleston P, Kattan M, Baker D, Slavin RG, Gergen P, et al.
The role of cockroach allergy and exposure to cockroach allergen in causing morbidity among inner-city children with asthma.
N Engl J Med
1997;
336:
1356-1363 |
| 18. |
Tunnicliffe W, Fletcher T, Hammond K, Roberts K, Custovic A, Simpson A, et al.
Sensitivity and exposure to indoor allergens in subjects with differing asthma severity.
Eur Respir J
1999;
13:
654-659 |
| 19. |
Simpson A, Custovic A, Pipis S, Adisesh A, Faragher B, Woodcock A.
Exhaled nitric oxide, sensitisation and exposure to allergens in asthmatics not taking inhaled steroids.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1999;
160:
45-49 |
| 20. |
Fraenkel DJ, Bardin PG, Sanderson G, Lampe F, Johnston SL, Holgate ST.
Lower airways inflammatory response during rhinovirus colds in normal and asthmatic subjects.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1995;
151:
879-886 |
| 21. |
Grunberg K, Smits HH, Timmers MC, de Klerk EP, de Gouw HW, Kroes AC, et al.
Experimental rhinovirus 16 infection. Effects on cell differentials and soluble markers in sputum of asthmatic subjects.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1997;
156:
609-616 |
| 22. |
Lemanske Jr RF, Dick EC, Swenson CA, Vrtis RF, Busse WW.
Rhinovirus upper respiratory infection increases airway hyperreactivity and late asthmatic reactions.
J Clin Invest
1989;
83:
1-10 |
(Accepted 7 November 2001)
Read all Rapid Responses