Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Chris Griffiths a Department of
General Practice and Primary Care, St Bartholomew's and the Royal
London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary's School of
Medicine and Dentistry, London E1 4NS, b Department of Human Science
and Medical Ethics, Royal London Hospital, London E1 2AD, c Newham
General Hospital, London E13 8RU Correspondence to: C Griffiths c.j.griffiths{at}mds.qmw.ac.uk
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective:
To explore reasons for increased risk of
hospital admission among south Asian patients with asthma.
Design:
Qualitative interview study using modified critical incident technique and framework analysis.
Setting:
Newham, east London, a deprived area with a
large mixed south Asian population.
Participants:
58 south Asian and white adults with
asthma (49 admitted to hospital with asthma, 9 not admitted); 17 general practitioners; 5 accident and emergency doctors; 2 out of hours general practitioners; 1 asthma specialist nurse.
Main outcome measures:
Patients' and health
professionals' views on influences on admission, events leading to
admission, general practices' organisation and asthma strategies,
doctor-patient relationship, and cultural attitudes to asthma.
Results:
South Asian and white patients admitted to hospital coped differently with asthma. South Asians described less
confidence in controlling their asthma, were unfamiliar with the
concept of preventive medication, and often expressed less confidence
in their general practitioner. South Asians managed asthma
exacerbations with family advocacy, without systematic changes in
prophylaxis, and without systemic corticosteroids. Patients describing
difficulty accessing primary care during asthma exacerbations were
registered with practices with weak strategies for asthma care and were
often south Asian. Patients with easy access described care suggesting
partnerships with their general practitioner, had better confidence to
control asthma, and were registered with practices with well developed
asthma strategies that included policies for avoiding hospital admission.
Conclusions:
The different ways of coping with asthma
exacerbations and accessing care may partly explain the increased risk
of hospital admission in south Asian patients. Interventions that
increase confidence to control asthma, confidence in the general
practitioner, understanding of preventive treatment, and use of
systemic corticosteroids in exacerbations may reduce hospital
admissions. Development of more sophisticated asthma strategies by
practices with better access and partnerships with patients may also
achieve this.
|
What is already known on this topic
What this study adds
|
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Black and south Asian people are at increased risk of hospital admission with asthma.1-7 No consistent differences in severity or prevalence of asthma, prescribed drugs, or asthma education have been described. 1 4 8 In one study south Asian patients were less likely to report adherence to their drug regimen or self management behaviour.1 Interventions to reduce admission rates in black and Asian groups have met with variable success.9-11
Differences in hospital admission rates for asthma between ethnic
groups might be because of differences in beliefs or behaviour during
exacerbations or in access to or delivery of care. Our aim was to
explore these factors in south Asian and white adults admitted to
hospital with asthma.
| |
Participants and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The study setting was Newham, east London, a highly deprived area with a large (30%) mixed south Asian population (Indian, Pakistani, and Bangladeshi).12 The local research ethics committee approved the study.
Participants
Patients admitted with asthma
We recruited 49 south Asian and white adults admitted with acute asthma to Newham
General Hospital (see box 1 for details). Recruitment was, as far as
possible, consecutive.14 As recruitment proceeded, we
reviewed the sample to ensure maximum diversity of experience in terms
of age, ethnicity, religion, duration and management of asthma attack,
and route of hospital admission.
|
Since the patients
admitted to hospital might be atypical in terms of their asthma
management, we compared their experiences with those of a limited
number of patients with severe asthma (British Thoracic Society (BTS)
step
313) but who had avoided admission.
General practitioners
Initially we interviewed a maximum
variety sample14 of patients' general practitioners from
practices with high and low admission rates for asthma, from
singlehanded and group practices and from practices where patients
described particularly good or poor relationships with their doctors.
In total, we interviewed 17 general practitioners.
Hospital clinical staff and out of hours primary care
services
We identified hospital and out of hours factors that
might influence admission by interviewing five doctors from Newham
accident and emergency department, the hospital asthma specialist
nurse, and two doctors working for the local Healthcall organisation.
Interviews
With their informed consent, GK interviewed patients in
their chosen language, usually on hospital wards. Interviews were
taped, translated where necessary, and transcribed verbatim. CG
interviewed the general practitioners.
Data analysis
We modified the critical incident
technique,
15 16
allowing analysis of interplay of
identified factors. A multidisciplinary team (sociologist,
anthropologist, and primary and secondary care doctors) met regularly
to analyse data. Two researchers coded interviews independently before
entry on a database.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We identified 60 influences on hospital admission, illustrating the complexity of participants' experience (see full version on bmj.com). Patients' statements about cognition, education, and behaviour were striking for their strength or consistency across and within interviews.
Personal influences
As well as citing causes such as infections and pollution,
many patients described adverse social circumstances and reckoned that
stress was a cause of attacks.
"What do you do to control your
asthma? Nothing really. Just salbutamol isn't it" (34 year old
Bangladeshi Hindu man)
with relatives managing attacks on a patient's
behalf or acting as mediators. Some statements by south Asian patients
seemed resigned, suggesting a particular attitude to illness in general
and their response to it. Many white patients seemed more personally
proactive and spoke of control in the first person (box
2).
|
"Pumps, there are
so many different ones
blue, brown, green
I put the machine on as
well. I don't know what is happening" (60 year old Punjabi Hindu
woman). In particular, the concept of preventive medication was
described by only one south Asian patient but was familiar to white
informants. Although references to formal management plans were rare,
white patients frequently described increasing the use of a
corticosteroid inhaler during an attack; this was absent from south
Asians' accounts. Sole use of reliever inhalers or nebulisers or
non-specific use of many inhalers was described by some white patients
but by all the south Asians interviewed.
The concept of using systemic corticosteroids to abort an exacerbation
was mentioned by only one south Asian man (his general practitioner
declined his request) but was common among the white patients interviewed.
Patients often held extreme views of their general practitioners.
Although patients from both ethnic groups had experience of doctors
they felt were inadequate
"He's a bitch. He's useless. He's too
busy, he says. He works two hours in the morning and two hours in the
evening surgery" (60 year old white woman (b))
overall there were
qualitative differences in relationships with general practitioners.
Some white informants said how long they had been registered with the
same doctor and that they were on first name terms
"He knows me so
well" (55 year old white woman). They valued continuity and personal
care. This familiarity was not evident in the accounts of south Asian
patients, whose statements were less personal
"He is neither good
nor bad. He is 50:50" (45 year old Pakistani Muslim man)
and more
functional
for example, that their general practitioner spoke the same
language, would visit if necessary, or might telephone to check they
were well.
Although there were some similarities in lifestyle and use of
complementary asthma treatment by patients (such as relaxation techniques, homoeopathy, Chinese herbalism, home acupuncture kits), there were important differences. Some south Asians used traditional medicines or dietary changes consistent with Islamic or ayurvedic humoral systems, particularly hot food spices such as ginger or turmeric, reflecting a view that cold foods were a cause of asthma. These were used in addition to, and rarely instead of, Western drugs.
By contrast, white patients mentioned self help (helplines, videos, and
books), lifestyle changes (stopping smoking, avoiding passive smoking,
exercise, recreation, taking vitamins), and peak expiratory flow monitoring.
Patients with severe asthma who had not been admitted to hospital
Both white and south Asian patients who had avoided
admission talked confidently about controlling asthma, understood the
concept of preventive medication, and trusted their general
practitioner or the local asthma specialist nurse. Support from
relatives generated control and confidence, rather than simply having
someone to mediate. Most patients had confidence to experiment with
self care. The medical model of self management was common.
Health professional influences
General practitioners' attitudes towards self management
and systemic corticosteroids
Self management plans were seen by general practitioners as
impractical, the level of understanding required being beyond most
patients. Many were wary of using systemic corticosteroids
"I don't
use courses of steroids, for the simple reason . . . I
just leave them to the hospital" (general practitioner of 57 year old Gujarati Muslim woman)
let alone allowing patients the responsibility to use them at home.
Views of accident and emergency doctors
Accident and emergency doctors asserted that patients were
admitted on the basis of clinical severity alone
"Well, I don't
know much about people's backgrounds when they come in. I haven't got
a lot of time to get into their social history . . . My
two biggest [criteria] are pulse and respiratory rate" (accident
and emergency senior house officer).
Access to primary care during asthma attacks
Easy access to primary care
Patients gaining easy access to primary care during
exacerbations described good relationships with their general practitioners. White patients predominated in this group; they had
confidence to control asthma and were proactive, negotiating contact
with primary care themselves and rarely involving relatives. The urge
to contact their general practitioner (rather than go straight to
hospital) was reinforced by previous experience
"I prefer going to
my GP . . . you know because he wants to see me" (20 year old white woman).
"Well I have known her, in my list,
since 1982. [I] look at all the histories, I made a note: `Father is
asthmatic, child as an infant had eczema' . . . I made
a diagnosis of bronchial asthma" (general practitioner of 20 year old
white woman).
"When I started with him, giving up [smoking] was the major
issue." (Interviewer) How would you describe your relationship with
this chap? "I sponsored him [to run a marathon]
. . . I'd say I have a fairly good relationship with
him" (general practitioner of 32 year old white man).
Difficult access to primary care
Patients describing difficult access to primary care during
asthma attacks were registered with practices with high admission rates
for asthma (median admission rate 55th of 67 Newham practices, compared
with 14th for easy access group). Most such patients were south Asian.
Difficulties included the doctor declining to visit, telling the
patient to arrange admission themselves, or giving telephone advice or
a prescription in place of a face to face consultation, and a
receptionist preventing patients speaking to their doctor. Family
members (including children) either mediated contact with the general
practitioner or were consulted as an alternative. General practitioners
described basic asthma strategies, with regular review as a basic aim,
but without prioritising asthma, targeting high risk patients, or
referring to partnerships of care. A lack of nursing support for some
practices led to a sense of desperation
"Our practice nurse has
gone. I can only do [anything] when they come and sit in front of
me
if they come. If they don't come I'm helpless" (general
practitioner of 57 year old Gujarati Muslim woman)
Direct self referral to hospital
Patients in this group had exacerbations of more sudden
onset (median duration of attacks before admission 2.5 days, with many
admitted within 24 hours, compared with 7 and 14 days respectively for
groups with easy and difficult access to primary care). White and south
Asian patients called ambulances to get immediate care. Many had
previous admissions and considered hospital to be the best place to
be
"You get full attention once you come in [to hospital] with the
breathing. You know you don't wait about anywhere. You're
in
boomf
and you're sorted. It's wonderful." (65 year old white
man)
and some had experience of poor access to primary care.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study takes a patient orientated rather than biomedical approach to understanding hospital admission for asthma. In comparing two ethnic groups we do not cast the behaviour of the white patients as normative. Indeed, few patients typified the medical model of asthma self management. We are aware of dangers of stereotyping behaviour in ethnic groups, as well as problems in aggregating groups into classifications that may obscure cultural differences. None the less, distinctions emerged in accounts of south Asian and white patients that are consistent with other work 1 17 and which could explain differences in risk of admission.
The patients (frequently white) with confidence to manage exacerbations had good access to general practitioners with well developed practice strategies for managing asthma. These strategies emphasised policies to avoid admission, targeting of high risk patients, and a supportive approach. Good access to primary care is associated with reduced risk of hospital admission.18 Our findings are consistent with those of Clarke et al, who reported that a behavioural intervention for doctors that promoted a partnership style of consulting increased patients' confidence and reduced their use of health services.19 Developing partnerships with doctors that lead to better asthma control might be more difficult for some south Asian patients, either because doctors' espousal of Western medical concepts (such as use of regular prophylaxis) may impede a partnership relationship or because the partnership model itself may conflict with beliefs about what is an appropriate doctor-patient relationship.
The south Asian patients admitted to hospital in this study were often less confident, even resigned, about controlling asthma than the white patients. This could reflect either an intrinsic cultural characteristic or the difficulties of coping with asthma in deprived social circumstances where racism is common and health services are often inadequate and inappropriate. Two observations support the latter view. Firstly, south Asian patients occasionally contrasted their poor asthma control in Britain with better control in India or Pakistan. Secondly, the south Asians and white patients we interviewed who had not been admitted showed similar confidence to control asthma and to experiment with new approaches.
Understanding and use of asthma drugs
That south Asian (and some white) patients seemed unaware
of the roles and benefits of systemic corticosteroids and preventive
treatment in exacerbations clearly made admission to hospital more
likely. Moudgil et al reported that an educational intervention
provided by a south Asian respiratory specialist reduced use of
healthcare services for asthma in white but not south Asian
patients,11 suggesting differences in how the same information is understood and acted on. Further work should determine how cultural barriers between patient and clinician hinder education.
Other factors
Although our sample was small, our study suggests some
factors may be less important than previously thought. Firstly, language problems were rarely cited. Difficulties of access probably relate to a range of factors including organisation and attitudes within primary care as well as power issues between general
practitioners, staff, and patients in areas such as race, class,
religion, and sex. Secondly, singlehanded practices were capable of
sophisticated asthma care, provided they were adequately resourced.
Thirdly, south Asian patients referred themselves to hospital with
similar reasons and frequency as white patients. Fourthly, use of
traditional medication by south Asian patients was by no means
ubiquitous and rarely to the exclusion of Western drugs. Fifthly, we
found no evidence of an "ethnicity filter" at the accident and
emergency department that might increase the likelihood of admission
for south Asians. Sixthly, we found no difference in socioeconomic status that might explain differences between our two groups. Seventhly, we did not detect a gradient in control and confidence reflecting first to third generational status of south Asians. Finally,
we found no evidence of variations in behaviour between south Asian groups.
Conclusions
General practices with south Asian patients may benefit
from interventions that encourage the development of sophisticated
asthma strategies including admission avoidance policies and
partnership styles of consultation. A better understanding of the
meaning of asthma in south Asian groups should contribute to
educational interventions that promote the concepts of preventive treatment, self care, and the benefit of systemic corticosteroids.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank all the participants; Patricia Sturdy, Ian Jones, and Keith Meadows for help developing the original idea; Jeannette Naish for advice on sampling and help identifying patients; Dorcas MacLaren for providing practice admission rates; Tanya Price and Mei Chung for administrative support; and Colin Bradley for observations on the use of the critical incident technique.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Editorial by Krishnan et al
Funding: National Asthma Campaign.
Competing interests: None declared.
The full version of this paper
appears on bmj.com
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Moudgil H, Honeybourne D.
Differences in asthma management between white European and Indian subcontinent ethnic groups living in socioeconomically deprived areas in the Birmingham (UK) conurbation.
Thorax
1998;
53:
490-494 |
| 2. |
Ayres JG.
Acute asthma in Asian patients: hospital admissions and duration of stay in a district with a high immigrant population.
Br J Dis Chest
1986;
80:
242-248 |
| 3. |
Myers P, Ormerod LP.
Increased asthma admission rates in Asian patients: Blackburn 1987.
Respir Med
1992;
86:
297-300 |
| 4. |
Ormerod LP.
Adult Asian acute asthma admission rates reassessed: Blackburn 1991-1992.
Respir Med
1995;
89:
415-417 |
| 5. |
Gilthorpe MS, Lay-Yee R, Wilson RC, Walters S, Griffiths RK, Bedi R.
Variations in hospitalization rates for asthma among black and minority ethnic communities.
Respir Med
1998;
92:
642-648 |
| 6. |
DePalo V, Mayo PH, Friedman P, Rosen MJ.
Demographic influences on asthma hospital admission rates in New York City.
Chest
1994;
106:
447-451 |
| 7. |
Rona RJ.
Asthma and poverty.
Thorax
2000;
55:
239-244 |
| 8. |
Partridge MR.
In what way may race, ethnicity or culture influence asthma outcomes?
Thorax
2000;
55:
175-176 |
| 9. |
Kelso TM, Self TH, Rumbak MJ, Stephens MA, Garrett W, Arheart KL.
Educational and long-term therapeutic intervention in the ED: effect on outcomes in adult indigent minority asthmatics.
Am J Emerg Med
1995;
13:
632-637 |
| 10. |
Sperber K, Ibrahim H, Hoffman B, Eisenmesser B, Hsu H, Corn B.
Effectiveness of a specialized asthma clinic in reducing asthma morbidity in an inner-city minority population.
J Asthma
1995;
32:
335-343 |
| 11. |
Moudgil H, Marshall T, Honeybourne D.
Asthma education and quality of life in the community: a randomised controlled study to evaluate the impact on white European and Indian subcontinent ethnic groups from socioeconomically deprived areas in Birmingham, UK.
Thorax
2000;
55:
177-183 |
| 12. | East London and the City Health Authority. Health in the East End: annual public health report 1999/2000. London: East London and the City Health Authority, 2000. |
| 13. |
British Thoracic Society.
The British guidelines on asthma management: 1995 review and position statement.
Thorax
1997;
52(suppl):
S1-21 |
| 14. | Quinn Patten M. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. London: Sage, 1990. |
| 15. |
Bradley C.
Turning anecdotes into data the critical incident technique.
Fam Pract
1992;
9:
98-103 |
| 16. | Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, eds. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge, 1994. |
| 17. | Community Health Sciences Research Group. Systematic reviews of access to and treatment of cardiovascular disease and mental health services in ethnic groups. London: Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Queen Mary College, 2000. |
| 18. |
Bindman AB, Grumbach K, Osmond D, Komaromy M, Vranizan K, Lurie N, et al.
Preventable hospitalizations and access to health care.
JAMA
1995;
274:
305-311 |
| 19. |
Clark NM, Gong M, Schork MA, Evans D, Roloff D, Hurwitz M, et al.
Impact of education for physicians on patient outcomes.
Pediatrics
1998;
101:
831-836 |
(Accepted 19 July 2001)