Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Gordon C S Smith a Department
of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Glasgow, Queen Mother's
Hospital, Glasgow G3 8SH, b Department of Public Health,
Greater Glasgow Health Board, Glasgow G3 8YU Correspondence to: G C S Smith, Department
of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, Rosie Hospital,
Cambridge CB2 2SW gcss2{at}cam.ac.uk
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective:
To determine whether first and second
births among teenagers are associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes after confounding variables have been taken into account.
Design:
Population based retrospective cohort study using routine discharge data for 1992-8.
Setting:
Scotland.
Main outcome measures:
Stillbirth, preterm delivery,
emergency caesarean section, and small for gestational age baby among
non-smoking mothers aged 15-19 and 20-29.
Results:
The 110 233 eligible deliveries were
stratified into first and second births. Among first births, the only
significant difference in adverse outcomes by age group was for
emergency caesarean section, which was less likely among younger
mothers (odds ratio 0.5, 95% confidence interval 0.5 to 0.6). Second
births in women aged 15-19 were associated with an increased risk of moderate (1.6, 1.2 to 2.1) and extreme prematurity (2.5, 1.5 to 4.3)
and stillbirth (2.6, 1.3 to 5.3) but a reduced risk of emergency caesarean section (0.7, 0.5 to 1.0).
Conclusions:
First teenage births are not
independently associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy
outcome and are at decreased risk of delivery by emergency caesarean
section. However, second teenage births are associated with an almost
threefold risk of preterm delivery and stillbirth.
|
What is already known on this topic
What this study adds
|
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Teenage pregnancy is an important public health problem as it often occurs in the context of poor social support and maternal wellbeing. Some studies have suggested that first teenage pregnancies have a higher frequency of adverse perinatal outcomes. 1 2 However, there is argument about whether this is an independent association 1 2 or explained by confounding factors.3-5 In general, the risk of adverse outcomes is lower in second pregnancies. However, longitudinal studies comparing outcomes in first and second pregnancies in teenagers have produced inconsistent results.6-9 Cross sectional studies comparing the outcome of second births in teenagers and older women have observed increased rates of preterm birth, low birth weight, and perinatal death 10 11 but have failed to adjust for potential confounding factors such as smoking and socioeconomic deprivation.
Scotland is well placed to study the outcomes of teenage pregnancy.
Teenage pregnancy rates in the United Kingdom are the highest in
western Europe. Routine obstetric data have been collected on more than
99% of births in Scotland for over 20 years.12 Scotland
has a population that is relatively homogeneous in terms of race, and
health care is free at the point of access, including all medical,
surgical, drug, and dental treatment during pregnancy. The aims of this
study were to determine whether teenage pregnancy was associated with
increased rates of adverse perinatal outcome, whether the association
differed by parity, and whether any associations were independent of
confounding factors.
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We used the Scottish morbidity record 2 (SMR2) database to identify all singleton births resulting in a live or stillborn baby during 1992-8. Inclusion in the main study group was restricted to first or second births, gestation at birth of between 24 and 43 weeks, birth weight >500 g, maternal age between 15 and 29 years, and non-smoking mothers. We also selected a second cohort who fulfilled all the above criteria except that they were classified as smokers at the time of first attendance for antenatal care.
Definitions and denominators
First births were defined as births to women who had had no
previous pregnancies or whose previous pregnancies had all ended in
either therapeutic abortion or miscarriage. Second births were defined
as having been preceded by only one pregnancy that did not result in
abortion. Gestational age at birth was defined as the number of
completed weeks of gestation based on the estimated delivery date in
the clinical record. A small for gestational age baby was defined as a
live baby who was less than the 5th percentile of birth weight for the
given week of gestation, using percentiles derived from all Scottish
singleton live births recorded in the SMR2 database with values for
both birth weight and gestational age in 1992-8 (n=409 541). The
denominator was all live births.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Data were complete in 371 531 (90.3%) cases, and the main study group comprised the 110 233 non-smoking women aged between 15 and 29 years having a first or second birth between 24 and 43 weeks gestation of a baby weighing over 500 g.
Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics and the frequency of adverse outcomes in the study group.
|
We then compared the risk of adverse outcomes associated with maternal age 15-19 between first and second births. This indicated that the risk of delivering a small for gestational age baby and of having an emergency caesarean section did not differ significantly by parity. However, when the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes associated with maternal age 15-19 was compared for first and second births, there were significant differences in the odds ratios of moderately premature birth (P=0.01), extremely premature birth (P=0.004), and stillbirth (P=0.03) (table 2). Therefore, the multivariate analyses were stratified by parity.
|
On multivariate analysis, women aged 15-19 years having first births were not at increased risk of any of the six adverse outcomes studied compared with women aged 20-29 (table 2). However, among second births, mothers aged 15-19 were at significantly increased risk of moderately and extremely premature birth and stillbirth (table 2). Emergency caesarean section was less likely among younger mothers at both first and second births. There were no significant interactions between maternal age at the time of delivery and socioeconomic deprivation quintile, height, year of delivery, or previous abortions for any of the outcomes for either first or second births.
When the risk of adverse outcome was compared within the age range 15-19, there was no significant variation in the risk of moderately or extremely premature birth, stillbirth, neonatal death, or delivery by emergency caesarean section. However, compared with 19 year old women, the risk of delivering a baby weighing less than the fifth percentile for gestational age was significantly lower among women aged 16 to 18 (figure).
|
The proportion of women who were current smokers but fulfilled the other inclusion criteria at the time of first attendance for antenatal care varied by age and parity. Among women aged 15-19, 12 862 (47.5%) of first births and 2148 (54.8%) of second births were to smokers, whereas among women aged 20-29, 28 875 (27.4%) of first births and 26 120 (34.1%) of second births were to smokers (P<0.001).
When outcomes among 70 005 smokers were analysed, the risks associated with maternal age 15-19 again varied by parity. Among first births to smokers, there was a weak positive association between being aged 15-19 and moderately premature birth (table 3). Among second births to smokers, women aged 15-19 were at increased risk of moderately and extremely premature delivery and neonatal death. For both first and second births among smokers, being aged 15-19 was associated with a decreased risk of delivering a small for gestational age baby and being delivered by emergency caesarean section (table 3).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Compared with older women, women who had a first birth during their teenage years were not at increased risk of any of the adverse outcomes studied and, indeed, were at significantly decreased risk of requiring emergency caesarean section. A previous study from the United States found that first teenage birth was independently associated with an increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction and of premature delivery,1 and a Swedish study observed that first teenage births were at increased risk of perinatal death.2 The main weakness of both studies was the failure to adjust for maternal smoking. Smoking is one of the strongest risk factors for adverse perinatal outcomes,14 and previous studies have shown that pregnant teenagers are more likely to smoke than pregnant older women. 15 16 Our findings in non-smoking mothers suggest that the positive associations previously reported among first births might simply reflect inadequate adjustment for confounding variables. Indeed, when outcomes were compared within the age range 15-19, women aged 16-18 had a decreased risk of intrauterine growth retardation, which is consistent with a previous population based study from the United States.17
By contrast, we found that second births among women aged between 15 and 19 years were associated with an almost threefold risk of extremely premature birth and stillbirth compared with women aged between 20 and 29 years (table 2). A similar pattern was observed among women who smoked. However, the Scottish mortality record database does not include information on the number of cigarettes smoked a day or the duration of smoking. Both of these might be expected to vary systematically with age. Since there is a dose-effect relation between smoking and adverse outcomes,18 the findings among smokers should be interpreted with caution.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest a causal relation between second teenage
birth and adverse pregnancy outcome. It is unlikely that the
association can be explained by differences in the interval between
pregnancies among teenage and older mothers since the associations
observed were much greater than those previously reported for short
intervals between pregnancies.19 Furthermore, teenage
mothers were not at increased risk of a small for gestational age baby,
which is known to be more common after a short interval between
pregnancies.19 A biological cause could be confirmed or
refuted only by access to more detailed socioeconomic information at the individual level. This would require prospective collection of data.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Jim Chalmers, consultant in public health medicine, at the Information and Statistics Division for providing the crude Scottish morbidity record (SMR2) data.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: None.
Competing interests: None declared.
The full version of this paper is
available on the BMJ's website
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Fraser AM, Brockert JE, Ward RH.
Association of young maternal age with adverse reproductive outcomes.
N Engl J Med
1995;
332:
1113-1117 |
| 2. |
Olausson PO, Cnattingius S, Haglund B.
Teenage pregnancies and risk of late fetal death and infant mortality.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol
1999;
106:
116-121 |
| 3. |
Strobino DM, Ensminger ME, Kim YJ, Nanda J.
Mechanisms for maternal age differences in birth weight.
Am J Epidemiol
1995;
142:
504-514 |
| 4. |
Berenson AB, Wiemann CM, McCombs SL.
Adverse perinatal outcomes in young adolescents.
J Reprod Med
1997;
42:
559-564 |
| 5. |
Lao TT, Ho LF.
The obstetric implications of teenage pregnancy.
Hum Reprod
1997;
12:
2303-2305 |
| 6. |
Elster AB.
The effect of maternal age, parity, and prenatal care on perinatal outcome in adolescent mothers.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
1984;
149:
845-847 |
| 7. |
Hellerstedt WL, Pirie PL, Alexander GR.
Adolescent parity and infant mortality, Minnesota, 1980 through 1988.
Am J Public Health
1995;
85:
1139-1142 |
| 8. |
Sweeney PJ.
A comparison of low birth weight, perinatal mortality, and infant mortality between first and second births to women 17 years old and younger.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
1989;
160:
1361-1367 |
| 9. |
Blankson ML, Cliver SP, Goldenberg RL, Hickey CA, Jin J, Dubard MB.
Health behavior and outcomes in sequential pregnancies of black and white adolescents.
JAMA
1993;
269:
1401-1403 |
| 10. |
Lumley J.
The epidemiology of preterm birth.
Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol
1993;
7:
477-498 |
| 11. |
McCormick MC, Shapiro S, Starfield B.
High-risk young mothers: infant mortality and morbidity in four areas in the United States, 1973-1978.
Am J Public Health
1984;
74:
18-23 |
| 12. | Cole SK. Scottish maternity and neonatal records. In: Chalmers I, McIlwaine GM, eds. Perinatal audit and surveillance. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 1980:39-51. |
| 13. |
McLoone P, Boddy FA.
Deprivation and mortality in Scotland, 1981 and 1991.
BMJ
1994;
309:
1465-1470 |
| 14. |
DiFranza JR, Lew RA.
Effect of maternal cigarette smoking on pregnancy complications and sudden infant death syndrome.
J Fam Pract
1995;
40:
385-394 |
| 15. |
Olausson PM, Cnattingius S, Goldenberg RL.
Determinants of poor pregnancy outcomes among teenagers in Sweden.
Obstet Gynecol
1997;
89:
451-457 |
| 16. |
Lao TT, Ho LF.
Obstetric outcome of teenage pregnancies.
Hum Reprod
1998;
13:
3228-3232 |
| 17. |
Lee KS, Ferguson RM, Corpuz M, Gartner LM.
Maternal age and incidence of low birth weight at term: a population study.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
1988;
158:
84-89 |
| 18. |
Kyrklund-Blomberg NB, Cnattingius S.
Preterm birth and maternal smoking: risks related to gestational age and onset of delivery.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
1998;
179:
1051-1055 |
| 19. |
Zhu BP, Rolfs RT, Nangle BE, Horan JM.
Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes.
N Engl J Med
1999;
340:
589-594 |
(Accepted 4 June 2001)
Read all Rapid Responses