Table 2 Results of a meta-analysis for the five gastroprotective strategies on primary and secondary health outcomes. Values are numbers of events (relative risks, with 95% confidence intervals) unless otherwise indicated




H2 receptor antagonist v placebo

Proton pump inhibitor v placebo

Misoprostol v placebo

COX-2 selectives v non-selectives

COX-2 specifics v non-selectives

Primary outcomes











Total No of trial participants

2621

1358

16 945

28 178

25 564

Serious gastrointestinal complications

1 (0.33, 0.0 to 8.1)

3 (0.46, 0.1 to 2.9)

75 (0.57, 0.4 to 0.9)*

43 (0.61, 0.3 to 1.1)

114 (0.55, 0.4 to 0.8){dagger}

Symptomatic ulcers

1 (1.46, 0.1 to 35.5)

18 (0.09, 0.0 to 0.5){dagger}

54 (0.36, 0.2 to 0.7)*

82 (0.41, 0.3 to 0.7)*

281 (0.49, 0.4 to 0.6)*

Serious cardiovascular or renal events

5 (0.53, 0.1 to 3.5)

3 (0.78, 0.1 to 6.3)

4 (1.78, 0.3 to 12.1)

48 (0.95, 0.6 to 1.7)

241 (1.19, 0.8 to 1.8)

Mortality

1 (3.00, 0.1 to 68.3)

1 (0.17, 0.0 to 4.1)

35 (0.89, 0.5 to 1.7)

19 (0.68, 0.3 to 1.6)

78 (1.02, 0.6 to 1.9)

Health related quality of life

N/A

N/A

N/A

Weighted mean difference –0.10 (–1.0 to 0.8)

N/A

Secondary outcomes











Gastrointestinal symptoms

201 (0.72, 0.6 to 0.9){dagger}

45 (0.43, 0.2 to 0.8)*

1218 (0.97, 0.7 to 1.4)

3894 (0.73, 0.7 to 0.8)*

5184 (0.81, 0.7 to 0.9)*

Endoscopic ulcers

250 (0.55, 0.4 to 0.7)*

281 (0.37, 0.3 to 0.5)*

658 (0.33, 0.3 to 0.4)*

24 (0.41, 0.2 to 1.1)

522 (0.25, 0.2 to 0.3)*

Anaemia

1 (3.00, 0.1 to 73.3)

N/A

1 (2.66, 0.1 to 63.8)

6 (0.30, 0.1 to 1.3)

464 (0.62, 0.5 to 0.7){dagger}

Occult bleeding

N/A

N/A

16 (0.46, 0.2 to 1.3)

17 (0.86, 0.3 to 2.2)

N/A

Total dropouts

362 (0.97, 0.8 to 1.1)

116 (0.98, 0.6 to 1.5)

4772 (1.11, 1.0 to 1.2){ddagger}

4274 (0.93, 0.9 to 1.0)*

9510 (0.82, 0.7 to 0.9){dagger}

Dropouts due to gastrointestinal symptoms

57 (0.71, 0.4 to 1.2)

48 (0.45, 0.3 to 0.8)*

2332 (1.36, 1.3 to 1.5)§

1174 (0.63, 0.6 to 0.7)*

2171 (0.69, 0.6 to 0.8){dagger}

N/A=not available. Significance level 5%. *Significant protective relation, no heterogeneity and significance not lost on sensitivity analysis. {dagger}Significant protective relationship, but significant heterogeneity or significance lost on sensitivity analysis. {ddagger}Significant harmful relationship, but significant heterogeneity or significance lost on sensitivity analysis. §Significant harmful relationship, no heterogeneity and significance not lost on sensitivity analysis