|
Editor's Choice | This Week in BMJ | Press releases BMJ No 7133 Volume 316 Editorial Saturday 7 March 1998 Poverty in rural areasIs more hidden but no less real than in urban areas
Rural societies are diverse, with a greater proportion of both people in higher socioeconomic groups and those with low pay than in urban populations.(1,2) Scattered among the relatively wealthy landowners, commuters, and professionals are rural dwellers living on very low incomes.(3,4) A recent BMJ editorial exhorted doctors to "combat the damage" of poverty.(5) In doing so, doctors should look beyond the rural idyll and recognise that, as elsewhere in the world, poverty in Britain is not confined to cities. Carr-Hill et al emphasised the importance of looking at very small units - individuals and their families - when considering health needs.(6) This is particularly important in rural areas. In cities generalised observations about a street or electoral ward may be reasonably accurate, but in the country an affluent landowner and his socially isolated and underprivileged neighbour may be the only people for miles around. Twenty per cent of the rural population of England and 25% of rural households live in "absolute poverty" (on an income of less than 140% of supplementary benefit entitlement).(2)(7) In rural Scotland in 1994, 49% of heads of households had annual incomes below £7,800 (half the median Scottish wage). In remote areas such as the Outer Hebrides the situation was worse, with almost the whole population on "poverty" incomes.(3) Elderly people are worst affected: 35% of poor rural households are elderly people living alone. Employment trends help to explain such low incomes. The number of people employed in agriculture is decreasing. The trend is towards insecure, low paid, often part time work with limited potential for progression - for example, in tourism.(8) Only 38% of women in rural development areas have paid employment, compared with a British average of 45.5%.(1) Rural dwellers are less likely to register as unemployed and more likely to migrate in search of work.(2) Contrary to popular belief, rural homelessness is a substantial problem. In England alone, over 46 000 people, 11.6% of the country's homeless, are in rural areas.(9) The popularity of second homes and retirement homes has led to inflated property prices, unattainable by young people. Rented accommodation may be available only during winter, out of the tourist season. The sale of council houses has reduced the availability of low cost housing for rent.(4) Townsend describes poverty as "financial inability to participate in the everyday styles of living of the majority."(10) The more recent, broader concept of "social exclusion," developed within the European Union, may be more helpful. It shifts the focus from income and expenditure to multidimensional disadvantage, relating the individual to the society in which he or she lives.(11) Despite an increase in the size of many villages, services such as shops, schools, banks, police stations, and pubs have diminished.(12) People without their own transport and those with mobility problems have increasing difficulty in gaining access to services and are forced to use those local services that remain. They spend more per item at village stores than those who can drive to supermarkets. The rural rich can economise in ways that their poorer neighbours cannot. Similarly, independent transport is an expensive necessity in remote areas (77% of rural households have a car compared with an English average of 68%(1)) and compounds the poverty of families on low incomes. The popular image of poor rural dwellers being uncomplaining seems to be true. Many compare their situation with the harsher conditions of the past rather than with the current lifestyles of the majority.(3) Our knowledge of rural health need is limited,(13) but it is both logical and justifiable to assume that poverty and poor health are associated in rural areas,(14) just as they are in our towns and cities. We should not be blinded by the fact that rural poverty is hidden. Jim Cox
General practitioner
email: jim.cox@btinternet.com References
1 Shucksmith M, Roberts D, Scott D, Chapman P, Conway E.
Disadvantage in rural areas. Salisbury: Rural Development
Commission, 1996.
2 Cloke P, Milbourne P, Thomas C. Lifestyles in rural
England. Salisbury: Rural Development Commission, 1994.
3 Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Disadvantage in rural
Scotland. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 1994. (Social Policy
Research 62.)
4 Skerratt S, Chapman P, Shucksmith M. Disadvantage in
rural and urban Allerdale. Aberdeen: Arkleton Centre for Rural
Development Research, 1996.
5 Haines A, Smith R. Working together to reduce poverty damage.
BMJ 1997;314:529-30.
6 Carr-Hill RA, Rice N, Roland M. Socio-economic determinants of
rates of consultation in general practice based on fourth national
morbidity survey of general practices. BMJ 1996;312:1008-12.
7 Bradley A. Poverty and dependency in village England. In:
Lowe, Bradley, Wright, eds. Disadvantage and welfare in rural areas.
Norwich: Geo Books, 1987.
8 Townsend A. New forms of employment in rural areas: a national
perspective. In: Champion and Watkins, eds. People in the
countryside. London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 1991.
9 Rural Development Commission. Homelessness in rural
England: update to 1992/93. London: Rural Development Commission,
1994.
10 Townsend P. Poverty in the United Kingdom.
Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1979.
11 Room G. Beyond the threshold: the measurement and
analysis of social exclusion. Bristol: Policy Press, 1995.
12 Rural Development Commission. Survey of rural
services. London: Rural Development Commission, 1994.
13 Cox J. Rural general practice. Br J Gen Prac 1994;
44:388.
14 Phillimore P, Reading R. A rural advantage? Urban/rural health
differences in northern England. J Publ Health Med 1992;14:
290-9.
Home | Current issue | Past issues | Classified ads | Career Focus | Feedback Collections | About this site | About the BMJ | BMA | Medline
|