Editor's Choice | This Week in BMJ | Press releases
BMJ No 7115 Volume 315 Papers Saturday 25 October 1997
Adverse drug reactions in elderly patients as contributing factor for hospital admission: cross sectional studyCyndie K Mannesse, Frans H M Derkx, Maria A J de Ridder, Arie J Man in 't Veld, Tischa J M van der Cammen Adverse reactions to drugs in elderly patients are a major clinical problem.(1) Patients' perceptions about the presence of drug reactions may contribute to their earlier detection,(2) but no studies have related patients' complaints about adverse reactions to the objective presence of reactions, and no study has been performed in elderly patients.
Subjects, methods, and resultsAll admissions of patients aged 70 and over to our medical wards from 1 February to 1 May 1994 were analysed. We excluded patients transferred from other wards and those readmitted within a month. Patients gave their informed consent. Data were collected on drug treatment, and patients were asked whether they thought any of their medical problems were caused by their drugs. The presence and severity of an adverse reaction was assessed from the history, examination, and laboratory tests, using the methods of Kramer et al(3) and Hutchinson et al(4) and the British National Formulary.(5) A reaction was defined as severe if it was potentially life threatening or led to admission. Differences in patient characteristics (table) and the use of specific drugs in patients with adverse reactions and those without were tested with chi2 or Fisher's test for dichotomous variables and Student's t test or the Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables. Variables with a significant influence on univariate analysis (P=0.05 and over) were used in a backward selection (using P<0.05 as criterion) to build a multiple logistic regression model. Results are expressed as two tailed P values.
A total of 128 patients were identified (24% of all admissions), but 22 were excluded because of transfer, readmission, refusal, or death. The 106 patients had a mean age of 78 (70-91); 60 were women. Of the total, 102 were receiving drug treatment (mean 5.9 drugs); 44 patients admitted (42%, 95% confidence interval 32% to 51%) had had one or more adverse reactions and 25 had had severe reactions (24%, 16% to 32%). None of the 15 deaths during the study were directly related to an adverse drug reaction. Comparison of patients with and without an adverse reaction causing admission was feasible in 12 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding or haematuria: 5 were taking an oral anticoagulant, which was used by only 9 of the 94 patients who were not admitted for bleeding (P=0.009). In multivariate analysis a fall before admission (odds ratio 51.3 (3.2 to 834.3), P=0.006), the presence of gastrointestinal bleeding or haematuria (19.8 (4.4 to 88.6), P<0.001), and the use of three or more drugs (14.5 (1.2 to 175.3), P=0.04) were significant factors in patients with severe adverse reactions (table). Severe reactions in 5 patients admitted after falling included orthostatic hypotension (2 patients were taking diuretics), drug intoxication (1 patient taking carbamazepine and 1, phenobarbitone), and anaemia caused by gastrointestinal bleeding (1 taking a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug).
The 102 patients having drug treatment were asked whether they had complaints caused by their drugs. A correct opinion about the presence of adverse drug reactions was found in 73 of the 93 patients (79%, 70% to 87%) who could answer the question: 28 correctly recognised a reaction, while 45 who did not complain of an adverse reaction correctly affirmed its absence - a sensitivity of 0.70 and a specificity of 0.85. The negative predictive value of the question was 0.79 and the positive predictive value 0.78. Eighteen of the 25 patients with a severe reaction could not, however, implicate the drug in their current illness; these severe reactions were unrecognised by 14 of the 57 patients who did not complain of adverse reactions (24.6%) and in 4 of the 9 patients who could not answer the question.
CommentOverall, 1 in 6 elderly patients admitted to a general ward
experienced adverse drug reactions; severe reactions occurred in 24%.
This study confirms the view that drug reactions are related to the use
of more drugs rather than the presence of more diagnoses. Other
si
Department of
Internal Medicine I, Department of Internal Medicine I, Institute for Epidemiology and
Biostatistics,
Correspondence to: Dr Mannesse
Funding: The Erasmus Centre for Research on Aging gave
financial support for the statistical analysis.
(Accepted 29 September 1997)
References
1 Van Kraaij D J W, Haagsma C J, Go I H, Gribnau F W J. Drug use
and adverse drug reactions in 105 elderly patients admitted to a
general medical ward. Neth J Med 1994;44:166-73.
2 Egberts T C G, Smulders M, de Koning F H P, Meyboom R H B, Leufkens
H G M. Can adverse drug reactions be detected earlier? A comparison of
reports by patients and professionals. BMJ
1996;313:530-1.
3 Kramer M S, Leventhal J M, Hutchinson T A, Feinstein A R. An
algorithm for the operational assessment of adverse drug reactions. I.
Background, description, and instructions for use. JAMA
1979;242:623-32.
4 Hutchinson T A, Leventhal J M, Kramer M S, Karch F E, Lipman A G,
Feinstein A R. An algorithm for the operational assessment of adverse
drug reactions. II. Demonstration of reproducibility and validity.
JAMA 1979;242:633-8.
5 British Medical Association, Royal Pharmaceutical
Society of Great B
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||