|
BMJ No 7114 Volume 315 Saturday 18 October 1997 This Week in BMJ | Editor's Choice | Press releases
Editorials 961
Passive smoking: history repeats itself
962
High cost, low volume care: the case of haemophilia
964
Formula fever: allocating resources in the NHS
965
Ethics and international research
966
Hastening slowly: Mr Dobson plays a waiting game
News 967
Surgeons accused of ignoring high death rates
Papers 973
Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and ischaemic heart disease: an
evaluation of the evidence
980
The accumulated evidence on lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke
989
Prevalence of carcinoma in situ of the testis in 207 oligozoospermic
men from infertile couples: prospective study of testicular biopsies
991
Comparison of two assays for measuring plasma concentrations of
paracetamol
992
Comparison of case fatality in smokers and non-smokers after acute
cardiac event
General practice 994
Sociodemographic and morbidity indicators of need in relation to
the use of community health services: observational study
Clinical review 997
Science, medicine, and the future: Obesity treatment
1000
Lesson of the week: Subjective change in ejaculate as symptom of
infection with Schistosoma haematobium in travellers
1002
ABC of palliative care: Mouth care, skin care, and lymphoedema
Education and debate 1006
As the health divide widens in Sweden and Britain, what's happening to
access to care?
1009
Personal paper: The conflict in transferring a cystic fibrosis
specialist service between two hospitals in Manchester
1011 Correction: Should we screen for gestational diabetes? The case for screening for gestational diabetes - Soares and others
Letters 1012
Trends in asthma mortality 1014
Trend in occurrence of asthma among children and young adults
1015
Helicobacter gastroduodenitis
1016
Adding heat probe treatment to adrenaline injection for spurting
haemorrhage of peptic ulcers
1016
"Clearing house" is needed to match available junior doctors to
unfilled SHO posts
1017
Debate over mentally ill patient's caesarean section was too emotional
1017
Insulin dependent diabetes is probably due to environmental effect
during childhood
1018
Palliative drugs are not for shortening life
1018
Frequent consumption of red meat is not risk factor for
cancer 1018
Incidence of early syphilis acquired in former Soviet Union is
increasing 1019
Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
1019
Elimination of firearms 1020
Medical advice is available for ships at sea
1021
Defence of cardiologist in misconduct case
1021
Delayed diagnosis for breast disease is mostly due to
patients 1021
Words matter 1021
Correction: The future of healthcare systems
Obituaries 1022 P Aikman, K W Aron, M D Baber, W G M Bell, D S Chapman, J P Crummie, J B D Evans, A M Flynn, H L Gardner, T C Millar, S S F Munro
Medicopolitical digest 1024
Consultants plan crisis survey
Views & reviews Soundings 1025 Please help us by completing the questionnaire
Personal view 1025 Help from unexpected sources
Medicine and the media 1026
Back to the future (again)
Medicine and books 1027 Stopping AIDS: AIDS/HIV Public Education and the Mass Media in Europe Kaye Wellings, Becky Field
Television, AIDS and Risk. A Cultural Studies Approach to
Health Communication John Tulloch, Deborah Lupton
How to Survive in Anaesthesia P Neville
Robinson, George M Hall
Minerva 1028
S2 Career Focus Classified supplement Remediation
Editor's choiceDrama in the BMJDrama is the common thread in this week's BMJ, and we begin with a tale of possible suppression. "News is what somebody somewhere wants to suppress; all else is advertising," said one newspaper potentate. And bodged suppression can be good for business. Colin Douglas, one of our columnists, was delighted years ago when a letter in the BMJ suggested that one of his books should be banned. He knew that the phrase, "The book the BMJ tried to ban" would boost sales. So what from this week's BMJ might be banned? I feel I must answer my question furtively, looking over my shoulder as I write this in my study on a Monday night. Caution is necessary because the tobacco industry might take out an injunction and try to stop distribution of the paper confirming that being married to a smoker increases the risk of lung cancer by 26% (p 980). The paper also adds to the evidence that exposure to the smoke is definitely the cause. We will abstain from press releasing this paper because of the fear of an injunction. "Why," you might ask, "would the tobacco industry want to stop this paper and not the companion paper that shows that passive smoking increases the risk of heart disease?" (p 973). The answer is to do with the law. A woman who has never smoked, lived with a smoker, and contracted lung cancer may have a case against a tobacco company, whereas it will be much harder for her to prove that her heart disease was a direct effect of environmental tobacco. The next drama is a "whatdunnit?" Imagine, Sherlock, that you see a series of young men complaining of subjective changes in their semen. What is the clinching question to ask? The answer: "Have you swum recently in Lake Malawi?" Gordon McKenna and others from Christchurch, New Zealand, describe seven young men with changes in their semen caused by schistosomiasis (p 1000). All had swum in Lake Malawi. Now, conflict. Two consultant physicians tell how two Manchester hospitals fought for an income generating cystic fibrosis centre (p 1009). The result was "a climate of fear, uncertainty, and demoralisation for the unit, patients, and managers." The many purchasers involved could not agree, and there was no system for arbitrating between opposing groups. This battle was eventually resolved, but many are still being fought - the authors tell us. Finally, a cock up that could have been very dramatic. Last week - unnoticed by us or the media - we published a letter critical of government policy signed by Graham Winyard, the medical director of the NHS. But Dr Winyard was not on a suicide mission. Rather, the authors had copied the letter to him, and we had mistakenly added his name to the list of authors (p 1021). There seem to be so many new ways to muck up. Sorry, Graham.
Home | Current contents | Past issues | Classified ads | Career Focus | Feedback Collections | About this site | About the BMJ | BMA | Medline
|