|
BMJ No 7110 Volume 315 Saturday 20 September 1997 This Week in BMJ | Editor's Choice | Press releases | Cover note
Editorials
691
Multiple sclerosis, depression, and suicide
692
Growth hormone: panacea or punishment for short stature?
693
Occipital plagiocephaly: an epidemic of craniosynostosis?
694
Child health promotion and its challenge to medical education
695
The future of vascular services: the need for a strategy
696
Authorship is dying: long live contributorship News
697
New Scottish parliament will focus on health
Papers
703
Should we pay the patient? Review of financial incentives to enhance
patient compliance
708
Long term results of growth hormone treatment in France in children of
short stature: population register based study
713
Rising incidence of insulin dependent diabetes in children aged under 5
years in the Oxford region: time trend analysis
717
Investigation into the increase in hay fever and eczema at age 16
observed between the 1958 and 1970 British birth cohorts
722
Comparison of the prediction by 27 different factors of coronary heart
disease and death in men and women of the Scottish heart health study:
cohort study
733
ABC of mental health: Psychological treatments
736
Should we screen for gestational diabetes?"The concept of
gestational diabetes was popularised before considerations of evidence
based medicine came on the scene"
The case for screening for gestational diabetes
740
How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative
research)
744
Authorship
748
General practice fundholding and health care costs
750
Guidelines on circumcision
750
Warfarin use in patients with atrial fibrillation
751
Title of news item on stillbirths was inaccurate
751
Bitten - by taxonomy
751
New logo
752
G A D Gordon, B S Grant, J A H
Henderson, S K M Jivani, A E B Matthews,
S S Pavillard, A I Ross, H M Slack,
T Venkateswarlu, J Watson, B Weinstein
Soundings
754 Better ads for healthier people
754 Breast feeding does not always work
755 The Lost Art of Healing Bernard Lown
The Undertaking: Life Studies from a Dismal Trade Thomas
Lynch
756
This week's journal offers several different kinds of truth. In
opening the last article in her series on how to read a paper Trisha
Greenhalgh and Rod Taylor contrast the approaches of quantitative and
qualitative research (p 740). On the one hand, a finding is more
likely to be accepted as a fact if it is expressed in numbers. On the
other, qualitative researchers "seek a deeper truth": they aim to
make sense of things in terms of the meanings people bring to them.
The problem of encouraging patients to comply with their treatment may
seem ripe for qualitative research, but a paper this week offers
instead a hard quantitative insight: that financial incentives work
(p 703). In their systematic review of randomised controlled trials
with quantitative data on the effect of financial incentives on
compliance Antonio Giuffrida and David Torgerson found 11 small trials.
Ten showed that financial incentives improved patient compliance. In
the 11th the (non-financial) measure also worked, but it was more a
stick than a carrot: parents were told that if they missed more than
three successive appointments their child would go to the bottom of the
waiting list.
Being named as the author of a research paper is often seen an
incentive, as several of our letter writers point out (p 744). They
are continuing the debate started in the BMJ and other
journals about reforming the current messy system of authorship, and
their letters cover the arguments: unfairness to junior workers,
arrogation by senior ones, the need for researchers to gain authorship,
and the need for readers to know who takes responsibility. The
BMJ has decided to experiment with a "film credit"
system of listing contributors and guarantors (p 702): we hope that
authors will adopt this suggestion and help evolve a workable
alternative to traditional authorship. Tim Scott, however, has a
different view of the world. His deconstructionist analysis sees
authorship as a way of staking out territorial rights and power
(p 744). The authorship system probably accurately reflects power
relations within scientific communities, and changing it will only
"add another layer of obscurity to conceal its essentially political
nature."
Finally, the book reviews offer yet another kind of view on the world
(p 755). In reviewing Bernard Lown's The Lost Art of
Healing, David Weatherall agrees with his lament for the loss
of clinical wisdom, kindness, and pastoral care under a tide of
technology, though he attributes it to different factors in Britain
than in America: "No one can practice the healing art if they are
always in a hurry." A related view emerges from the second book,
written by a poet-undertaker. Anthony Clare describes it as
"passionately written by a man lamenting a world so rich in
technology that everything works better, even the people, but no one
seems to know why."
|