This Week in BMJ | Editor's Choice | Press releases | Advertisement details


BMJ No 7089 Volume 314

Press releases Saturday 26 April 1997
Embargoed: 00.01 hrs 25 April 1997 UK time


Has HIV become more aggressive?
Hospital private finance initiative "will lead to shrunken NHS"
Mental health and criminal justice reform
Patients lose out to purchaser-provider bureaucracy
Locality commissioning works, but needs more support
Health of the nation targets unattainable, say GPs

Has HIV become more aggressive?

[Is the clinical course of HIV-1 changing? Cohort study]

HIV disease may have become more aggressive over the last few years, says a paper in this week's BMJ.

Alessandro Sinicco and colleagues from the University of Turin studied the progression of the disease in 285 patients recruited between September 1985 and January 1995. They found that patients whose blood showed signs of infection after December 1989 had both a higher probability of decline in the immune system cells affected by the virus (CD4 cells) and a faster progression to AIDS than patients who had become infected before this date.

Although all patients had similar immunological status at entry into the study, CD4 cell counts started differing at early stages of the infection. The authors say that the first twelve months after infection are critical for the future course of HIV disease, and that repeated monitoring is needed during this period to identify those patients who would benefit from early drug treatment.

The emergence of more virulent strains of HIV, they conclude, may be responsible for the aggressive course of HIV in people who were recently infected.

Contact: Dr Alessandro Sinicco

University of Turin

Tel: 00 39 11 439 3980
Fax: 00 39 11 776 1757


Hospital private finance initiative "will lead to shrunken NHS"

This specific paper is not embargoed

[What happens when the private sector plans hospital services for the NHS: three case studies under the private finance initiative]

The Private Finance Initiative (PFI), launched in 1992 to provide private capital funds for public sector initiatives, will lead to a shrunken NHS, unable to provide a comprehensive range of health services to all sections of the community, says a paper in this week's BMJ.

Allyson Pollock and colleagues investigated 17 first-wave PFI hospital schemes, accounting for 5% of all acute beds in England and almost a quarter in Scotland. PFI schemes are no local issue, they say; they indicate the likely configuration of hospital services nationally if current policies continue. Dr. Pollock and colleagues forecast bed reductions of around 26% for England and 30% for Scotland over the next five years. They also carried out a detailed study of three hospital PFIs in three areas - Lothian, Calderdale, and Bromley - where plans are at an advanced stage.

Under the PFI the public sector buys services, rather than assets. NHS Trusts invite private contractors to meet an output specification' which states not the number of beds needed, but the expected level of clinical activity. Once a private sector consortium has been selected, there is scope for further bed reductions.

The data available publicly are incomplete either because Trusts have not carried out the necessary analyses or because the business plans have not been published during the consultation process, say the authors. Bed numbers and patient activity in all three areas studied in detail are out of line with national and local trends. Patient throughput on each site would have to increase to unrealistic levels over the next five years to cope with the proposed reductions in beds.

"Health authorities are not making adequate provision for need" say the authors. "There is no evidence of input from primary care, social services, or public health, let alone from hospital specialists. These schemes involve the sale of public assets and commitment of public funds for many years to come, so the information should be publicly available."

Contact: Dr. Allyson Pollock

St. George's Hospital Medical School

Tel: 0181 725 2796
Fax: 0181 725 3584
e-mail:
a.pollock@sghms.ac.uk

[The Private Finance Initiative undermines rational planning of health services]

In an editorial, Sean Boyle, Fellow in health policy analysis at the King's Fund, London, says that private consortia find it very difficult to take part in the kind of open public consultation needed for effective health service planning. "Making private capital available for health service facilities is a commercial decision, not necessarily linked to benefit in terms of the overall system of health care delivery", he says. "The private finance initiative has accentuated an existing tendency to less open planning of services within a very narrow strategic framework, neither of which are good in the long term".

Contact: Sean Boyle

The King's Fund
London

Tel: 0171 307 2443
Fax: 0171 307 2440


Mental health and criminal justice reform

[Impact of a dedicated service for male mentally disordered remand prisoners in north west London: retrospective study]

Government policy has encouraged speedy transfer of mentally ill prisoners to NHS care, but arrangements have often proved slow and ineffective, says a paper in this week's BMJ.

The Bentham Unit was set up in February 1994 to provide rapid assessment and transfer for male mentally disordered remand prisoners in the former North West Thames Regional Health Authority. Tim Weaver and colleagues at Imperial College School of Medicine at St.. Mary's Hospital, London, and the University of Kent at Canterbury, looked at the time lapse between remand, assessment and transfer. They found that intervention by the unit coincided with a significant decrease in the time that prisoners spent in prison and a doubling of the number of patients referred for assessment and those transferred to NHS care.

"The role of similar units with special skills in forensic psychiatry should be further assessed", say the authors. "Early transfer out of prison will deliver more timely treatment and enable local providers to engage with patients before they are finally relocated."

Contact: Tim Weaver

Imperial College School of St. Medicine at St. Mary's London

Tel: 0181 846 6568
Fax: 0181 846 6555

In a letter, Tom McClintock, lecturer in forensic psychiatry at Crozier Terrace Medium Secure Unit, Hackney Hospital, London, calls on a new government to consider the long term effects of its criminal justice policy and set up a royal commission to look at the treatment of offenders.

Since 1992 the prison population in England and Wales has increased by half to its current level of almost 60,000. Both Conservative and Labour seem committed to increasing custodial sentences despite an inevitable worsening of problems in prisons, he says.

"Prisons are damaging and violent places, with large numbers of inmates who are mentally ill, have personality disorders, or are inadequate. The triad of popular ignorance, demands for the control of crime, and the presence of violent crime go well together in prompting harsher sentences",says the author. With both of the two major political parties not wishing to be seen to be soft' on crime, research about the causes of crime is being ignored.

Contact: Tom McClintock

Hackney Hospital
London

Tel: 0181 919 8562
Fax: 0181 985 0278

A series of letters on the crisis in London's mental health service calls for better integration of community and hospital mental health teams.


< a name=4>

Patients lose out to purchaser-provider bureaucracy

[Bureaucracy of purchaser-provider split delays treatment]

Patients are waiting an average of 135 days to be told that they cannot have an appointment for routine surgery, says a letter in this weeks BMJ. Before the National Health Service and Community Care Act came into force in 1990, general practitioners were free to refer their patients to the consultant of their choice at any hospital. But since the Act, several new tiers of administration are involved in referrals by non-fundholding GPs to a consultant whose hospital is outside the "contracting zone" of the patient's local health authority.

Sometimes these patients live within 1.6km of the hospital, says the letter from Iain Hutchison and colleagues at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Royal Hospitals NHS Trust, London. The authors found an average 135 day wait between a patient being referred to a consultant and the trust being notified that the patient's health authority had refused to authorise treatment. They describe one patient whose case was urgent who had to wait 151 days for the bad news.

This bureaucratic delay contravenes two standards in the patient's charter, they say:

  • From April 1995, when your GP or dentist refers you to the hospital, 9 out of 10 people can expect to be seen within 13 weeks'
  • To be referred to a consultant acceptable to you when your GP thinks it necessary'.
  • "The study shows that the government's reforms have created inefficiency where none existed before and have raised costs by necessitating the employment of new clerical staff to deal with the increased administration", say the authors.

    Contact: Iain Hutchison

    Royal Hospitals NHS Trust
    London
    Tel: 0171 377 7299
    Fax: 0171 377 7095


    Locality commissioning works, but needs more support

    [What does locality commissioning in Avon offer? Retrospective descriptive evaluation]

    Locality commissioning brought benefits for GPs in Avon, one of the UK's largest health districts, but lead GPs wanted more time, funding, and policy support for it to work, says a paper in this week's BMJ. Locality commissioning is one of a range of methods whereby GPs can influence the provision of health services. In Avon it differs from fundholding by emphasising collaboration between practices covering geographically defined populations and by not delegating hospital and community health service budgets from health authorities to general practitioners.

    Avon Health Authority serves nearly one million people, registered with 450 general practitioners in 147 practices. The authors, from the Department of Public Health Medicine, Avon Health Authority, Bristol, studied how well the objectives of locality commissioning had been met between April 1994 and November 1996. The majority of GPs surveyed believed that it had led to a more constructive relationship between themselves and the Health Authority, that there was useful development between practices in the locality, and that they felt more powerful about having a say on what services were available for their patients.

    Although there were no restrictions as to what services could be worked in, primary care and community services were affected more than hospital services, with the emphasis on primary mental health and chronic disease care, guidelines, and outpatient access. The financial cost of GPs participation was small, although some contributed unpaid time to the schemes.

    Lead general practitioners were frustrated by the lack of clear management framework and political impetus, and said that they would like to have more influence. But the vast majority of lead GPs enjoyed locality commissioning and believed that the benefits outweighed the costs.

    Contact: Dr. Christine Hine

    Avon Health Authority
    Bristol

    Tel: 0117 976 6648
    Fax: 0117 976 6601


    Health of the nation targets unattainable, say GPs

    A survey in this week's BMJ finds that, although half of the GPs questioned had strategies for meeting the government's Health of the Nation targets, most of them considered that they were unattainable. 390 general practitioners in the Northern region and Wessex were asked which of the targets they considered to be most attainable. Although the majority ranked coronary heart disease and stroke as the priority targets in their practice, only a quarter of those surveyed believed that the government's targets for these conditions could be achieved.

    The GPs thought that the targets for the reduction of cancer were most likely to be achieved, and the reduction of suicides the least likely. Obstacles to pursuing the targets at a practice level were excessive workload, too ambitious targets, unrealistic time scales, patient apathy, and lack of funds.

    "Effecting mass change in behaviour that is a risk to health and influencing factors such as personal motivation and socioeconomic conditions are beyond the remit of the primary healthcare team and possibly even beyond national campaigns" say the authors.

    Contact: Dr. Philip Cheung

    Centre for Health Studies
    University of Durham Tel: 0191 374 2347 or 0191 374 2313
    Fax: 0191 374 7010
    e-mail:
    Philip.Cheung@durham.ac.uk


    Embargo: 00.01 hrs Friday 25 April 1997


    For further information, please contact:

    Mary Rice on 0171 383 6529
    Public Affairs Division,
    BMA House,
    Tavistock Square,
    London,
    WC1H 9JP

    Telephone (8.30am - 6.00pm): 0171 383 6254
    After 6pm & at weekends: 01895 239687, 0181 674 6294, 0171 727 2897, 0181 651 5130, 0181 769 4949
    Fax: 0171 383 6403.

    If you currently receive your British Medical Journal press release by mail and you would like it faxed to you please telephone (00 44) 171 383 6123 (08.30hrs to 18.00 UK hours) or fax (00 44) 171 383 6403 (24 hours).

    When dialling the UK from abroad, remember to delete the first zero from the local area code, eg, (00 44) 171...

    BMA on Internet page: http://www.bma.org.uk

    If you intend to use any article publicised in this press release, ensure you quote the British Medical Journal as source.


    Current contents | Classified ads | Find | BMA | Local editions | Extras
    Advice to authors | Reprints | Subscriptions | Feedback | Home