
This Week in BMJ | Editor's Choice | Press releases | Advertisement details
BMJ No 7087 Volume 314 Commentary Saturday 12 April 1997
Why we did not seek informed consent
before testing patients for HIV
Satish Bhagwanjee, David J J Muckart, Prakash M Jeena,
Prushini Moodley
- We agree completely with the Nuremberg code and the
Helsinki declaration that informed consent is an essential prerequisite
for medical research. However, we believe that there may be
extraordinary circumstances when this right may be waived. We identify
four crucial requirements that must be fulfilled before research
without informed consent may be permitted.
Requirements that must be
satisfied before research without
consent
- 1. It is impossible to obtain informed consent
Eighty five per cent of admissions to our unit are emergency
cases. These patients cannot give informed consent because they are
critically ill. A second option is to obtain consent from a relative.
In our study this would have resulted in two possible scenarios.
Firstly, if the patient survived he or she could choose to be informed
about the result of HIV testing and maintain the right to limited
disclosure. But if the patient died the relative would have the right
to know the result. This would be a serious breach of patient autonomy.
Furthermore, such disclosure of results obtained in the course of
research when there was no risk of infection to the relative would
represent an unacceptable breach of patient
confidentiality.(1) It was therefore not
appropriate to seek
consent from relatives. The third option was to obtain consent on
discharge. This would have excluded all patients who died, which would
have profoundly limited the value of the study.
2. The research is of sufficient importance that patients' right
to informed consent may be waived
The problem of HIV and AIDS in South Africa has reached epidemic
proportions.(2-4) By the end of l992 over 300,000
people
were infected.(5) In 1994 the figure was estimated
to be 1.2
million.(6) Seroprevalence in the antenatal clinic
at our
hospital was 12% in 1992 and 23% in 1996 (A N Smith, personal
communication). If the worst case scenario materialises, by 2010 it is
estimated that 28-52% of all deaths will be related to HIV
infection.(7) The impact of the epidemic on scarce
intensive
care resources is likely to be profound. Our 2,000 bed hospital is
served by 25 intensive care beds (16 in the surgical unit).
Furthermore, our unit is the primary referral intensive care unit for
the province of Kwazulu-Natal. As a consequence of excessive demand and
our limited resources one fifth of all patients referred to our unit
are denied admission. Hence given the extent of the HIV epidemic it was
essential that any decisions regarding allocation of resources should
be based on objective data and not subjective impression (the ethical
principle of social justice). The study was therefore deemed to be of
sufficient importance to waive patients' right to informed consent.
3. There must be unanimous agreement among appropriate
individuals and groups that the aforementioned conclusions are
valid
The exhaustive procedure followed in verifying the suitability of
the protocol shows that we satisfied the third prerequisite-namely,
that there must be unanimous agreement among appropriate individuals
and groups about the importance of the research and the
impracticability of obtaining consent. In order to pre-empt prejudice
against HIV positive patients (and therefore prevent breach of two
other principles of medical ethics-namely, beneficence and
non-maleficence) and in view of the above considerations it was deemed
essential that a prospective blinded trial should be conducted. We
consulted three clinical departments, two laboratory departments, and
two international AIDS experts. The institutional ethics committee
appointed a subcommittee comprising Dr E M Barker (bioethicist and
principal author of the Medical Association of South Africa
guidelines), Professor D J Pudifin (clinician and AIDS expert), and one
of us (SB) to investigate the most suitable approach. Eighteen months
after initiation and deliberation among the various parties concerned
the protocol was finally approved by the ethics committee.
4. Every attempt must be made to protect patients' interests
after enrolment
Every effort was made to protect patients after enrolment.
Their HIV status was not disclosed to staff members lest disclosure
might result in discrimination. Patient care was never influenced by
knowledge of HIV status. HIV status of patients was not disclosed to
relatives, and the results were used exclusively for the study. On
completion of the study patients' HIV test results were permanently
removed from the hospital records.
Conclusion
- HIV and AIDS raise unique ethical considerations, which
are not limited to patient autonomy but encompass the three other
principles of medical ethics (beneficence, non-maleficence, and social
justice). In adhering to these three principles we breached the first
principle. Our decision to embark on this study was not taken lightly.
On the contrary, every attempt was made to ensure that the decision was
correct in the light of our unique circumstances.
References
1 Medical Association of South Africa. Guidelines
for the
management of HIV/AIDS. S Afr Med J 1992;82(suppl):1-16.
2 Ncayiyana D J. HIV/AIDS-nagging questions. S
Afr Med J 1995;85:7.
3 McIntyre J. HIV/AIDS in South Africa-a relentless
progression? S Afr Med J 1996;86:27-8.
4 Gilks C F, Haran D. Coping with the impact of
the HIV
epidemic-the Hlabisa-Liverpool link. S Afr Med J
1996;86:1077-88.
5 Kustner H G V, Swanevelder J P, Van Middelkoop A.
National
HIV surveillance-South Africa, 1990-1992. S Afr Med
J 1994;84: 195-200.
6 Latest figures on HIV pregnancies. S Afr
Med J
1995;85:610-1.
7 Lee T, Esterhuyse T, Steinberg M, Schneider H.
Demographic
modelling of the HIV/AIDS epidemic on the Soweto population-results
and health policy implications. S Afr Med J
1996;86:60-3.
Feedback
Please
submit your views on informed consent in the box below. You will receive a thank you message when your comment has been transmitted.
- To view responses to our request for feedback on various articles regarding informed consent within this issue, please click here.
Current contents |
Classified ads |
Archive and search |
Local editions
Extras |
Advice to authors
Reprints |
Subscriptions |
Feedback | Home
|