This Week in BMJ | Editor's Choice | Press releases | Advertisement details


BMJ No 7075 Volume 314

Press releases Saturday 18 January 1997
Embargo: Friday 17 January 00.01 Hrs


Out of hours primary care is changing rapidly

[Comparison of out of hours care provided by patients' own general practitioners and commercial deputising services: a randomised controlled trial Parts I and II]

[Reliability and validity of a new measure of patient satisfaction with out of hours primary medical care in the UK: development of a patient questionnaire]

[Changing the pattern of out of hours: a survey of general practice cooperatives]

[Observational study of a general practice out of hours cooperative: measures of activity]

[Nurse telephone triage in out of hours primary care: a pilot study]

[Editorial: Out of hours primary care]

Six papers in this week's BMJ highlight the growing variability in primary care outside normal surgery hours with increasing numbers of family doctors providing patient care via cooperative schemes or deputising services.

Until recently, out of hours care at GP level has generally been provided by the family doctors themselves or by commercial deputising services. Yet there has never been a rigorous comparison of the two. Dr Robert McKinley, Dr David Cragg and colleagues report the findings of a randomised controlled trial and find that despite there being no difference in health outcomes between patients using deputising services and those seeing their practice doctors "out of hours", patients seen by deputising doctors were less satisfied with the care they received. In response to a request for out of hours care, practice doctors were more likely than deputising services to offer telephone advice. When patients were visited at home, practice doctors got there sooner, and gave fewer, cheaper, and possibly more discriminating prescriptions than deputising service doctors. No difference was found in the number or duration of hospital admissions between the two groups of doctors. Patient satisfaction is an important element of the outcome of medical care and needs to be studied, says Dr McKinley. His team has developed a questionnaire to measure it.

Out of hours cooperatives have nearly tripled in number since 1995. A paper by Dr Jeremy Dale and colleagues reports on a survey of GP cooperatives. Findings suggest "that a substantial shift is occurring away from home visiting and towards increased telephone advice and base consultations (where the patient travels to the doctor). While cooperatives were active in developing quality standards, there was little input from patients or health authorities.

Dr Chris Salisbury compares a GP cooperative in London with a deputising service in the overlapping area. The two services handled calls from patients differently with far more patients receiving telephone advice from the cooperative and fewer receiving prescriptions. The deputising service however carried out visits more quickly. Only 7% of patients attended the primary care centre at the cooperative.

Specially trained nurses can operate a nurse telephone triage system to receive, assess and manage incoming patient calls after surgery hours. The BMJ carries a paper on SWOOP (The South Wiltshire Out of hours Project) which piloted such a triage system. It found that nurses could deal with over a third of calls to two general practices, thereby reducing the workload of doctors. Most patients found the service acceptable.

In an editorial, Lesley Hallam of the National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, writes :"..equality of access to uniformly high standards of care is an important goal for primary health care and increasing variability in the organisation and delivery of out of hours services should not lead to increasing inequality".

Contact:
Dr Robert McKinley

Tel: 0116 258 4367
Fax: 0116 258 4982

Dr D.K.Cragg

Tel: 0161 256 3015
or via: 0161 275 2114
Fax: 0161 256 1070
e-mail: dcragg@fsi.rgp.man.ac.uk

Dr Jeremy Dale

Tel: 0171 733 1885
Fax: 0171 501 9370

Dr Chris Salisbury

Tel: 0171 725 1075
Fax: 0171 706 8426
e-mail: c.salisbury@ic.ac.uk

Dr Steve George

Tel: 01703 796 533
Fax: 01703 796 529
e-mail: s.george@wiphm.soton.ac.uk

Lesley Hallam

Tel: 0161 275 7601
Fax: 0161 275 7600
e-mail: lhallam@fsi.cpcr.man


Visual problems associated with anti-epileptic vigabatrin

[Severe persistent visual field constriction associated with vigabatrin]

Vigabatrin is one of the newer drugs used in Britain to treat epilepsy. This week's BMJ reports three cases of severe, persistent, symptomatic constriction of the visual fields being associated with vigabatrin treatment.

The paper states that by January 1997 nine cases of visual field defects had been reported to the Committee on the Safety of Medicines. The manufacturers of vigabatrin (Hoechst Marion Roussel) are said to have received 28 reports of visual field abnormalities worldwide by January this year in an estimated 140,000 patients treated.

In November 9th issue 1996, BMJ published a paper and an editorial on drug treatment of epilepsy, which looked at the new generation of drugs including vigabatrin. The drugs were said to have been poorly assessed and while they were better than placebo at reducing the frequency of seizures, comparative trials would be needed to see if one drug was better than another.

Doctors writing in this week's BMJ describe three patients who developed visual problems two to three years after starting to take vigabatrin as a supplementary treatment for controlling epilepsy:

  • A 22 year old woman who complained of tunnel vision 37 months after starting to take the drug;
  • A 44 year old man with constriction of his visual field 28 months after starting to take vigabatrin;
  • A 46 year old woman who started bumping into things 38 months after starting vigabatrin treatment.
  • The authors say findings suggest the outer retina rather than the optic nerve is damaged.

    Contact:
    Dr M.C.Lawden
    consultant neurologist

    Tel: 0116 258 6480
    (not Thursday) Fax: 0116 258 6992

    Dr Tom Eke
    hon registrar opthalmology

    Tel: 0116 254 1414
    or 0116 258 6171


    Breast cancer patients prefer less frequent follow up care

    [Popularity of less frequent follow up for breast cancer in randomised study: initial findings from the hotline study]

    Reducing the frequency of routine follow up is popular among women with breast cancer states a paper in this week's BMJ.

    Although it is standard practice to advocate routine long term follow up of patients with breast cancer, the effectiveness of non-mammographic follow up has not been assessed in randomised trials, say the authors. A study of 196 women with breast cancer at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, compared the popularity of less frequent follow up with conventional follow up. In the "less frequent" group, review took place only at the time of mammograms unless a woman reported symptoms. The "conventional treatment" group of women received more intensive routine monitoring - a style of follow up that continues to be the norm with many physicians assuming that patients are reassured by frequent contact with their cancer specialists

    In contrast, the researchers report :"This cohort of patients with breast cancer was highly supportive of the option to pursue less frequent follow up and seemed willing to assume responsibility for seeking medical attention in the event of symptoms".

    The women in the "less frequent" group did not contact their GP more or seek telephone help more frequently than the conventional follow up group. Potential benefits of less intensive monitoring include more efficient patients care, less anxiety and inconvenience for symptom free patients, and cost effectiveness savings.

    Contact:
    Dr Richard Epstein
    Cancer Research Campaign
    senior clinical fellow

    Tel: 0181 846 1421
    Fax: 0181 846 1443


    Impact convulsions in contact sports - a public drama but not a private disaster

    [Retrospective study of concussive convulsions in elite Australian rules and rugby league footballers: phenomenology, aetiology, and outcome]

    Fans watching contact sports like rugby or Australian rules football witness many collisions between players and the occasional public drama of a team member having convulsions seconds after impact. A study in this week's BMJ says the outcome for the footballer is universally good.

    Twenty two cases of concussive convulsions covering a 15 year period were followed up by researchers to see what damage resulted from the events. In all cases, convulsions began within two seconds of impact and lasted up to two and a half minutes. No structural or permanent brain injury was present and all the players returned to elite competition within two weeks of their incident.

    The authors conclude that the convulsions are probably non-epileptic - no player developed epilepsy during the follow up study - and anti-epileptic treatment is not needed. The good news for players is that "prolonged absence from sport is unwarranted".

    Contact:
    Prof. Samuel Berkovic
    Australia

    Tel: 00613 9496 5529
    Fax: 00613 9457 2654
    e-mail: map@austin.unimelb.edu.au


    EMBARGO: 00.01 HRS Friday 18 January 1997


    For further information, please contact:

    Linda Millington on 0171 383 6473
    Public Affairs Division,
    BMA House,
    Tavistock Square,
    London WC1H 9JP

    PLEASE STATE THE BMJ AS THE SOURCE OF ALL ARTICLES USED


    Current contents | Classified ads | Archive and search | Local editions
    Extras | Advice to authors | Reprints | Subscriptions | Feedback | Home