
Current contents | Classified ads | Archive
and
search | Local editions | Advice to authors
Reprints | Subscriptions |
Feedback | Home
Abstracts Saturday 2 November 1996
D Killalea, L R Ward, D Roberts, J de Louvois, F Sufi, J M
Stuart, P G Wall, M Susman,
M Schwieger, P J Sanderson, I S T
Fisher, P S Mead, O N Gill, C L R Bartlett, B Rowe
Design - Case-control study of 16 primary household
cases and 32 controls of similar age and dietary habit. Packets of the
implicated foodstuff manufactured on a range of days were examined for
salmonella. All isolates of the epidemic phage type were further
characterised by pulsed field gel electrophoresis.
Results - 27 cases were identified, of which 26 were
in children. The case-control study showed a strong association between
infection with
Conclusions - Rapid international exchanges of
information led to the identification of the source of a major outbreak
of
Public Health Laboratory Service,
Public Health Laboratory Service,
Salmonella Reference Laboratory,
Food Hygiene Laboratory
Laboratory of Enteric
Pathogens
Public Health
Laboratory Service,
Barnet District Health Authority,
Correspondence
to: Dr Gill.
Abstract
Objectives - To identify the source of an
international outbreak of food poisoning due to Salmonella
agona phage type 15 and to measure how long the underlying cause
persisted.
Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre,
London NW9 5EQ
D Killalea, senior registrar
J de Louvois, head, Environmental Surveillance Unit
J M Stuart, consultant epidemiologist
P G Wall, consultant epidemiologist
O N Gill, deputy director (information)
C L R Bartlett, director
Central Public Health Laboratory,
London NW9 5HT
Laboratory of Enteric Pathogens
L R Ward, clinical scientist
D Roberts, deputy director
B Rowe, director
Statistics Unit,
London NW9 5EQ
F Sufi, statistician
Colindale Hospital,
London NW9 5HG
M Susman, consultant in communicable disease control
Michael Shelley, Peter Croft, Stephen Chapman, Charles Pantin
Design - Ecological cross sectional study linking general practitioner asthma prescribing with hospital admission data and a measure of deprivation.
Subject - 11 family health services authorities in the West Midlands region and 99 general practices in North Staffordshire.
Main outcome measures - Hospital admission rates for asthma; the ratio of inhaled corticosteroid to bronchodilator; and Townsend deprivation scores.
Result - No overall significant correlation was found between admission rates for asthma and corticosteroid:bronchodilator ratios for family health services authorities (Spearman's rs= -0.109, P 0.750) or general practices (rs = -0.084, P = 0.407). In deprived family health services authority areas and general practices an inverse non-significant correlation existed between admission rates for asthma and corticosteroid:bronchodilator ratios (rs= -.300, P = 0.624; r,= -0.218, P = 0.136). In contrast, in more affluent areas and general practices a positive non-significant correlation existed between admission rates and corticosteroid:bronchodilator ratios (rs=0.371,P = 0.468; rs= 0.038, P = 0.792).
Conclusion - Although the corticosteroid:bronchodilator ratio may be a valid indicator of the quality of prescribing for individual patients with asthma, caution should be applied in interpreting aggregated ratios. Differences in the severity of asthma or the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease may explain inconsistent associations between admission rates for asthma and corticosteroid:bronchodilator ratios in family health services authorities and general practices with different deprivation scores.
Industrial and Community Health Research Centre,
School of Postgraduate Medicine,
Keele University,
North Staffordshire Medical Institute,
Stoke on Trent ST4 7NV
Michael Shelley, research pharmacist
Peter Croft, professor of epidemiology
Charles Pantin, senior lecturer consultant physician
Department of Medicines Management
(formerly the Department of Pharmacy Policy and Practice),
Keele University, Keele,
Staffordshire ST5 5BG
Stephen Chapman, director of prescribing analysis
Correspondence to: Mr Shelley.