EDITOR, - The clinical and scientific committee of the Faculty of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care has noted a wide range of expert views on the recent publications on the combined oral contraceptive and venous thromboembolism[i-vi]and has circulated a position paper.[vii] The new studies confirm that low dose combined oral contraceptives carry an extremely low risk for healthy women.
The overall risk of venous thromboembolism for users of combined oral contraceptives containing gestodene and desogestrel is close to the previous estimate for all low dose combined oral contraceptives.[v] Combined oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel and norethisterone seem to be associated with a lower risk of non-fatal venous thromboembolism than previously reported (table).
Risk of non-fatal venous thromboembolism per 100,000 women per year
RiskWomen not using combined oral contraceptives[v] 5-11 All women using low dose combined oral contraceptives* 30 Women using combined oral contraceptives containing desogestrel or gestodene** 30 Women using combined oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel or norethisterone 15 Pregnant women and women post partum 60
* According to latest British estimate before publication of recent letter to all doctors from Committee on Safety of Medicines[x]. **Based on relative risk of twice the risk for women using combined oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel or norethisterone.
The data on myocardial infarction in women with no history of cardiovascular disease are reassuring. Lewis et al report no significant increase in the risk of myocardial infarction in users of pills containing gestodene or desogestrel compared with women not using the pill. The threefold increased risk of myocardial infarction previously reported in users of the combined oral contraceptive[viii] was still present among users of brands marketed earlier than pills containing desogestrel and gestodene. Smokers using brands marketed earlier had 11.1 times the risk of non-smoking women not using the pill (a significant difference), but the relative risk was 3.1 (not significant) m smokers using pills containing gestodene or desogestrel.[ix] We agree with Lewis et al that this one study, in which direct comparison of the products did not prove a significant difference, should be interpreted with extreme caution. We would welcome further comparative studies to confirm these findings.
The safety profile and observed high acceptability of products containing desogestrel or gestodene allow their continued use, subject to thorough, unbiased counselling in the context of all the recent studies and the letter from the Committee on Safety - of Medicines [x] The faculty is committed to developing evidence based guidelines, and until further data are available it endorses the guidelines given below
Prescribing guidelines
*Risk factors for venous thromboembolism are hereditary thrombophilia; an acquired predisposition, such as the presence of lupus anticoagulant or malignancy; mechanical factors, such as immobility or trauma which may be acute or temporary, or both); physiological factors, such as dehydration (which may be acute or temporary, or both); obesity (defined as a body mass index of 30 or over); and varicose veins (the data on the magnitude of risk attributable to varicose veins are conflicting, but extensive varicosity is likely to be a risk factor) The literature on the association of smoking with venous thromboembolic disease is mostly negative
A M MILLS (chair, clinical and scientific committee) C L WILKINSON (secretary) D R BROMHAM (committee member) J ELIAS (committee member) K FOTHERBY (committee member) J GUILLEBAUD (committee member) A KUBBA (committee member) A WADE (committee member)Faculty of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists London NWI 4RG
See also:
i. World Health Organisation Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease and Steroid Hormone Contraception. Venous thromboembolic disease and combined oral contraceptives: results of international multicentre case-control study. Lancet 1995;346:1575-82.
ii. World Health Organisation Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease and Steroid Hormone Contraception Effect of different progestagens in low oestrogen oral contraceptives on venous thromboembolic disease. Lancet 1995, 346:1582-8.
iii. Jack H, Jick S, Gurewich V, Wald Myers M, and Vasilakis C Risk of idiopathic cardiovascular death and non-fatal venous thromboembolism in women using oral contraceptives with differing progestagen components. Lancet 1995;346:1589-93.
iv. Bloemenkamp KWM, Rosendaal FR, Helmerhorst FM, Buller HR, Vandenbroucke JP. Enhancement by factor V Leiden mutation of risk of deep vein thrombosis associated with oral contraceptives containing third-generation progestagen. Lancet 1995;346:1593-6.
v. Farmer RDT, Preston TD The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with low oestrogen oral contraceptives Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1995;15 195-200
vi. Spitzer WO, Lewis AL Heinemann LAJ, Thorogood M, MacRae KD on behalf of Transnational Research Group on Oral Contraceptives and the Health of Young Women. Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thromboembolic disorders: an international case-control study. BMJ 1996;312:83-8. (13 January).
vii. Clinical and Scientific committee of the Faculty of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Statement on combined oral contraceptive pills and risk of venous thromboembolism. London FFPRHC, 1995
viii. Vessey PM Recent advances in oral contraception - lessons learnt from epidemiological studies British Journal of Family Planning 1984;10(1)(suppl 4) 4-10. ix. Lewis MA., Spitzer WO, Heinemann L AJ, MacRae KD, Bruppacher R, Thorogood M on behalf of Transnational Research Group on Oral Contraceptives and the Health of Young Women. Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of myocardial infarction: an international case-control study. BMJ 1996,312:88-90.
x. Committee on Safety of Medicines Combined oral contraceptives and thromboembolism. London CSM, 1995