Schroter S, Plowman R, Hutchings A, Gonzalez A. Reporting of ethical committee approval and patient consent by study design in five general medical journals. J Med Ethics 2006;32:718-23. [Abstract] [Full text PDF]
Pace NA, Owen M, Schroter S. What happens to papers rejected by the BMJ on ethical grounds. BMJ 2008;337:a1880. [Letter]
Haivas I, Schroter S, Waechter F, Smith R. Editors' declaration of their own conflicts of interest. CMAJ 2004;171:475-6 [Full text]
Schroter S, Morris J, Chaudhry S, Smith, R, Barratt H. Does the type of competing interest statement affect reader perceptions of the credibility of research? A randomised trial. BMJ 2004;328:742-3 [Full text]
Chaudhry S, Schroter S, Smith R, Morris J. Does declaration of competing interests affect reader perceptions? A randomised trial. BMJ 2002;325:1391-2 [Full text]
Williams HC, Naldi L, Paul C, Vahlquist A, Schroter S, Jobling R. Conflicts of interest in dermatology. Acta Derm Venereol 2006;86(6):485-97. [Full text] [Full text PDF]
Barratt H, Schroter S, Smith R. Two postal surveys of different methods of communicating rejection to authors submitting to a general medical journal. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance 2003;10:289-99.
Altman DG, Goodman SN, Schroter S. How statistical expertise is utilized in medical research. JAMA 2002;287:2817-20 [Full Text]
Sandars J, Schroter S. Web 2.0 technologies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: an online survey. Postgrad Med J 2007;83:759-62. [Abstract]
Schroter S, Jenkins RD, Playle RA, Walsh KM, Probert C, Kellner T, et al. Evaluation of an online interactive diabetes needs assessment tool (DNAT) versus online self-directed learning: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Educ 2011;11:35. [Full text]
Murray S, Lazure P, Schroter S, Leuschner PJ, Posel P, Kellner T, et al. International challenges without borders: a descriptive study of family physicians’ educational needs in the field of diabetes. BMC Fam Pract 2011;12:27. [Full text]
Schroter S, Jenkins D, Playle R, Walsh K, Probert C, Kellner T, Arnhofer G, Owens D. Evaluation of an online diabetes needs assessment tool (DNAT) for health professionals: a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2009;10:63. [Full text]
Schriger DL, Sinha R, Schroter S, Liu PY, Altman DG. From submission to publication: a retrospective review of the tables and figures in a cohort of randomized controlled trials submitted to the British Medical Journal. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48:750-6. [Abstract]
Müllner M, Waechter F, Schroter S, Squire B. How should abridged scientific articles be presented in journals? A survey of readers and authors. CMAJ 2005;172:203-5 [Full text]
Barratt H, Schroter S, Smith J. Authors’ perceptions of electronic publishing: Two cross sectional surveys. BMJ 2004;328:1350-3 [Abstract] [[Full text]
Schroter S, Glasziou P, Heneghan C. Quality of descriptions of interventions: a review of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 2012;2:e001978. [Full text]
Dosani S, Schroter S, MacDonald R, Connor J. Recruitment of doctors to non-standard grades in the NHS: Analysis of job advertisements and survey of advertisers. BMJ 2003;327:961-4. [Abstract] [Full text]
Altman DG, Ioannidis J, Moher D, Mollison J, Schriger D, Schroter S. Comparison of submitted and published reports of randomised trials. (In prep. Abstract presented at 5th Peer Review Congress, 2005).
Schroter S, Altman DG, Ioannidis JPA. An evaluation of time to publication for randomised trials submitted to the BMJ: a cohort study. (In prep. Abstract presented at 6th Peer Review Congress, 2009).
Schroter S, Roberts J, Loder E, Penzien D, Davies S, Houle T. Authors’ awareness of publication ethics: An international survey.
(In prep. Abstract presented at 7th Peer Review Congress, 2013).
Barbour V, Burch D, Godlee F, Heneghan C, Lehman R, Perera R, Ross JS, Schroter S. Characterisation of trials designed primarily for marketing purposes rather than addressing a genuine clinical need: a descriptive study. (In prep. Abstract presented at 7th Peer Review Congress, 2013).