Drug Tales and Other Stories

You do agree, don’t you?

BMJ 2008; 336 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39549.633530.94 (Published 17 April 2008)
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;336:894.2

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Ike Iheanacho, editor, Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin
  1. iiheanacho{at}bmjgroup.com

    It was a good idea. It still is. But somehow, something’s up with “concordance” in clinical care. This concept was introduced to help modernise how medical advice and interventions are discussed, offered, and decided on between professionals and patients. Sadly, though, it remains widely misunderstood and misused.

    Concordance challenged traditional models of health care, where the professional dictated treatment that the patient was expected to accept without questioning or complaint. The patient’s failure to show such compliance was seen as a key reason why treatment might …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL