Benign prostatic hyperplasia

The term BPH is misused

BMJ 2008; 336 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39493.447361.1F (Published 21 February 2008)
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;336:405.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Paul Abrams, professor of urology
  1. 1Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB
  1. paul_abrams{at}bui.ac.uk

    Drug companies market drugs for BPH (benign prostatic hyperplasia). However, this is a misuse of the term, which all dictionaries define as a histological term and not related to gross anatomical change. It is therefore disappointing that the BMJ has commissioned review articles on BPH .1 Several important organisations have accepted the arguments presented in the …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL