- David S Wald, senior lecturer,
- Jonathan P Bestwick, statistician,
- Nicholas J Wald, professor
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London EC1M 6BQ
- d.s.wald{at}qmul.ac.uk
Hadfield and Humphries favour cascade testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia (identifying relatives of affected individuals)1 over the child-parent screening approach2 but accept that cascade testing may only identify 50% of affected cases in the population. Cascade testing may have been “tried and tested” and found to be useful in identifying cases of familial hypercholesterolaemia within families, but it is not tried and tested as a general screening policy.3 Identifying all, or most, families first is …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012