Letter

PRP for GPs

Summary of responses

BMJ 2007; 335 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39346.699907.BE (Published 27 September 2007)
Cite this as: BMJ 2007;335:627.3

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Birte Twisselmann, assistant editor, bmj.com
  1. BMJ, London WC1H 9JR
  1. btwisselmann{at}bmj.com

    The editorial by cardiologist David S Wald on performance related pay (PRP) in primary care sparked 12 responses, mostly from aggrieved UK general practitioners (GPs).1 2 United in their opposition to Wald's suggestions for a “revised” quality and outcomes framework (QOF), several of the respondents point out that a hospital consultant may not be best placed to write about issues affecting primary care and the increasing complexity of primary care consultations.

    Many …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    BMJ most popular