- Michael Day
- London
Doctors' leaders and legal experts say that government plans to lower the level of proof needed to convict doctors of professional misconduct are unfair and probably unworkable.
Gordon Brown, the prime minister, last week announced details of a new Health and Social Care Bill, which will be introduced in the next parliament. At the heart of the bill will be a shake-up of the regulation of the medical profession.
The proposed reorganisation was announced by the chief medical officer, Liam Donaldson, a year ago (BMJ 2006;333:163, doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7560.163). He proposed that key aspects of the General Medical Council's regulatory role would be diminished. The council would no longer act as prosecutor, …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Does iron deficiency without anaemia cause fatigue and what is the reason behind it?
Published 26 May 2012
Re: Histology of Pilar Cysts - a counsel of perfection?
Published 26 May 2012
Re: David Southall: anatomy of a wrecked career
Published 26 May 2012
Re: The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality
Published 26 May 2012
Re: Five years after baby Peter
Published 26 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27