- Susan Mayor
- London
The drugs advisory body for England and Wales has recommended a “refund” scheme in which the manufacturer of bortezomib (Velcade) would reimburse the NHS for the cost of the drug in patients who do not respond to treatment.
The refund scheme, proposed by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), could signal a way for the NHS to cope with funding the rapidly growing range of new and expensive drugs. It was suggested by the company making bortezomib, Janssen-Cilag, as part of its appeal against NICE's previous recommendation that the drug was not cost effective.
NICE's independent advisory committee agreed and recommended in draft guidance published this week that all suitable patients with progressive multiple myeloma should be offered bortezomib. Patients who show a full or partial response should continue treatment, …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012