Journal withdraws paper on grounds of prior publication but avoids issue of plagiarism

BMJ 2007; 334 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39202.589086.DB (Published 3 May 2007)
Cite this as: BMJ 2007;334:925.9

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Jonathan Gornall
  1. London

    After more than a year of deliberation the journal of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine is to withdraw a Korean paper at the centre of a dispute about authorship and plagiarism (BMJ 2007;334:717-20, 7 Apr doi: 10.1136/bmj.39168.517234.AD), solely on the grounds that it had been published previously in another journal.

    In a statement issued last week the board of Fertility and Sterility made no reference to the allegations of perjury and plagiarism that had been made by its editor in chief in the LA Times two months earlier. On 18 February Alan DeCherney had told the newspaper, “I'm sure that it's plagiarism,” and said he would be recommending to his editorial board that all the listed authors be banned from publishing in Fertility and Sterility for three years (www.latimes.com, 18 Feb, “Credit for U.S. journal article at issue,” www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-research18feb18,0,6268481.story?coll=la-headlines-california).

    In the event Fertility and Sterility has announced that only one of the authors will be banned.

    The decision has infuriated Jeong Hwan Kim, a Korean doctor now working in Singapore, who wrote to Fertility and Sterility in March last year to alert the journal of his concerns relating to the paper “Quantification of mitochondrial DNA using real-time polymerase chain reaction in patients with premature ovarian failure” (Fertility and …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL