- Jonathan Gornall
- London
After more than a year of deliberation the journal of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine is to withdraw a Korean paper at the centre of a dispute about authorship and plagiarism (BMJ 2007;334:717-20, 7 Apr doi: 10.1136/bmj.39168.517234.AD), solely on the grounds that it had been published previously in another journal.
In a statement issued last week the board of Fertility and Sterility made no reference to the allegations of perjury and plagiarism that had been made by its editor in chief in the LA Times two months earlier. On 18 February Alan DeCherney had told the newspaper, “I'm sure that it's plagiarism,” and said he would be recommending to his editorial board that all the listed authors be banned from publishing in Fertility and Sterility for three years (www.latimes.com, 18 Feb, “Credit for U.S. journal article at issue,” www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-research18feb18,0,6268481.story?coll=la-headlines-california).
In the event Fertility and Sterility has announced that only one of the authors will be banned.
The decision has infuriated Jeong Hwan Kim, a Korean doctor now working in Singapore, who wrote to Fertility and Sterility in March last year to alert the journal of his concerns relating to the paper “Quantification of mitochondrial DNA using real-time polymerase chain reaction in patients with premature ovarian failure” (Fertility and …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012