- Zosia Kmietowicz
- London
A review by MPs of proposals on how £1bn (€1.5bn; $1.9bn) worth of publicly funded health research should be allocated in the United Kingdom has raised concerns about introducing targets to set research priorities.
The cross party Science and Technology Committee has broadly welcomed the conclusions reached by Sir David Cooksey in his review published in December (BMJ 2006;333:1239, 16 Dec, doi: 10.1136/bmj.39059.559213.DB) on how healthcare research can be improved to bring more tangible benefits to patients.
The committee says it has reservations about some aspects of the proposals, however, and will be taking “a close interest in reviewing progress and how the new institutional arrangements will work in practice.”
In …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012