- Susan Mayor
- London
The first trials of new drugs in humans should be planned much more carefully, with the same clarity of purpose, design, and analysis as for studies supporting drug licensing, a report published this week recommends.
The report, published by a working party of the Royal Statistical Society, was prompted by the TGN1412 drug trial last year in which six healthy volunteers experienced severe immune reactions (BMJ 2005;332:683, doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7543.683). It found that “the trial design was not well suited to its objectives of testing the safety and tolerability of the drug.”
Stephen Senn, professor of statistics at the University of Glasgow …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012