- Lynn Eaton
- London
A string of medical experts have lined up to criticise the decision by the University of Virginia School of Medicine to accept funding for medical research from tobacco company Philip Morris—to the tune of $20m.
The American Medical Association, the American Public Health Association, and the editor of the academic journal Tobacco have all condemned the news.
“A medical school taking funding from the tobacco industry is like a peace studies school taking funding from terrorists,” said Tobacco Control's editor Simon Chapman, professor of public health at the University of Sydney.
Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, said he too was against the move.
“There is a growing body of evidence that this kind of arrangement results in biased studies in favour of the funder”. The real reason he suspects the tobacco industry does this is to help their image and improve the …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012