Editorial was confusing
- Mark J Bolland (m.bolland@auckland.ac.nz),
- Andrew Grey, associate professor of medicine,
- Ian R Reid, professor of medicine
- 1Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
The recent editorial by Landis et al has added confusion rather than clarity to the issue of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in association with the use of bisphosphonates.1 They do not distinguish between the use of very high doses of intravenous bisphosphonates (monthly pamidronate or zoledronate) to treat patients with malignancy, and the use of much lower doses of bisphosphonates (approximately 1/12 of the oncology dose) in the treatment of Paget's disease or osteoporosis. These two different uses of bisphosphonates have been associated with different risks …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Does iron deficiency without anaemia cause fatigue and what is the reason behind it?
Published 26 May 2012
Re: Histology of Pilar Cysts - a counsel of perfection?
Published 26 May 2012
Re: David Southall: anatomy of a wrecked career
Published 26 May 2012
Re: The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality
Published 26 May 2012
Re: Five years after baby Peter
Published 26 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27