Editorial was confusing
- Mark J Bolland (m.bolland@auckland.ac.nz),
- Andrew Grey, associate professor of medicine,
- Ian R Reid, professor of medicine
- 1Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
The recent editorial by Landis et al has added confusion rather than clarity to the issue of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in association with the use of bisphosphonates.1 They do not distinguish between the use of very high doses of intravenous bisphosphonates (monthly pamidronate or zoledronate) to treat patients with malignancy, and the use of much lower doses of bisphosphonates (approximately 1/12 of the oncology dose) in the treatment of Paget's disease or osteoporosis. These two different uses of bisphosphonates have been associated with different risks …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012