- Joanne Rimmer, specialist registrar in otolaryngology (jrimmer@doctors.org.uk),
- John Almeyda, consultant otolaryngologist
- West Middlesex University Hospital, Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 6AF
- West Middlesex University Hospital, Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 6AF
EDITOR—Arroll and Kenealy conclude that antibiotics are probably effective for acute purulent rhinitis but suggest that most patients will get better without them and hence advocate a “no antibiotics as first line” treatment plan.1 Their systematic review looked at seven studies comparing placebo with antibiotic treatment for “acute purulent rhinitis” and defined acute as “less than 10 days with this symptom.” They considered all papers …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012