Letter

Regulation and revalidation of doctors: Dangers and opportunities

BMJ 2006; 333 doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7562.303-a (Published 3 August 2006)
Cite this as: BMJ 2006;333:303.2

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Brian D Keighley, general practitioner (Bkeighley@aol.com)
  1. Balfron, Stirlingshire G63 0TS

    EDITOR—Pringle's editorial reinforces the General Medical Council's corporate view that its prime function is, and always will be, the protection of the public by promoting the highest standard of medical care in the United Kingdom, something that is best delivered in partnership with others.1

    Pringle welcomes the bipartite approach to revalidation, especially the element applying to career grade doctors. This, however, is to adopt only one view of the intention of revalidation, …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    BMJ most popular