Letter

Female genital mutilation: whose problem, whose solution?: Mutilation or modification?

BMJ 2006; 333 doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7561.259-b (Published 27 July 2006)
Cite this as: BMJ 2006;333:259.3

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Lois S Bibbings (Lois.S.Bibbings@Bristol.ac.uk), senior lecturer in law
  1. School of Law, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ

    EDITOR—Conroy's editorial and the study by Elmusharaf et al contribute to a literature that has often tended to be long on polemic and short on data.1 2 Conroy's recognition that our conceptions of what constitutes female genital mutilation need further thought is long overdue. As I have argued, a coherent response requires both that female genital …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    BMJ most popular