Letter

How should we rate research?: Counting number of publications may be best research performance measure

BMJ 2006; 332 doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7551.1214-c (Published 18 May 2006)
Cite this as: BMJ 2006;332:1214.4

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Bruce G Charlton (bruce.charlton@ncl.ac.uk), editor in chief, Medical Hypotheses,
  2. Peter Andras, reader in complex systems and computational intelligence
  1. University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
  2. University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU

    EDITOR—The debate about how to replace the UK research assessment exercise is confused.1 For example, the numbers of publications and citations are research output measures while research council funding and numbers of academic and research staff are input measures.

    Non-transparency and lack of objectivity …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    Read related article

    See previous polls

    BMJ most popular