GMC appeals against extending immunity for expert witnesses

BMJ 2006; 332 doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7541.568-a (Published 9 March 2006)
Cite this as: BMJ 2006;332:568.2

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Clare Dyer, legal correspondent
  1. BMJ

    The General Medical Council is seeking permission to appeal against a High Court ruling last month giving expert witnesses immunity from disciplinary proceedings over evidence given in court.

    The unexpected judgment by Mr Justice Collins in an appeal by the retired paediatrician Roy Meadow bars regulators from taking action against expert witnesses unless the complaint is initiated by a judge.

    Witness immunity is a longstanding legal principle that protects witnesses in court cases from being sued for damages over anything they say in court. The policy behind the rule is to encourage witnesses to give their evidence freely in the interests of justice. …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL