- Janice Hopkins Tanne
- New York
The New England Journal of Medicine has issued an editorial “statement of concern” about the omission of data in a paper it published. It said that three heart attacks were omitted from a study comparing rofecoxib (Vioxx) with naproxen, under-stating the risks of rofecoxib.
The editorial by the journal's three top editors will appear in print in the 29 December issue but was published online on 8 December (www.nejm.org, doi: 10.1056/NEJMe058314).
It said: “Relevant data on cardiovascular outcomes had been deleted from the VIGOR [Vioxx gastrointestinal outcomes research] manuscript prior to its submission to the journal and… the authors had withheld data on other relevant cardiovascular outcomes. …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012