Classification is not explanation
- Edwin P Kirk (e.kirk{at}unsw.edu.au)
- Department of Medical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospital, High Street, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
EDITOR—Gardosi et al report that under the ReCoDe classification “only 15.2% of stillbirths remained unexplained.”1 But if the most common “condition” was fetal growth restriction, and 43% fell into this category, then at least 58% are still unexplained under this system. To classify something falls well short of explaining its cause.
There are many different known causes for fetal growth restriction and doubtless many unknown or at least unidentifiable ones. Some of these may not even contribute to a risk of stillbirth when present. The goal should be a clear understanding of the underlying cause of every stillbirth. The fetal postmortem examination, despite its lack of effect on classification in this study, remains a vital part of this effort and has repeatedly been shown to have an important impact on counselling to parents about the risks of recurrence.
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None declared.
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012